Blaise Bicknell and Aidan Kim will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Winston-Salem for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Blaise Bicknell who should win in 3 sets.
Blaise Bicknell -> 1.86
Aidan Kim -> 1.86
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Blaise Bicknell vs. Aidan Kim
This will be the 2nd time that Blaise Bicknell and Aidan Kim fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Bicknell (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Bicknell won 6-3 6-3 in the quarter in M15 South Bend back in 2023.
Blaise Bicknell
18 - 15win/loss
513
306
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 25-21 | 22-13 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 12-17 | 9-10 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-16 | 22-9 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-22 | 13-10 | 15-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-9 | 8-6 | 4-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 599, Blaise got to the 2nd round after defeating Johannus Monday 6-4 5-7 7-5.
In the 1st round, Blaise defeated Monday (6-4 5-7 7-5). During the match, Bicknell scored 112 points vs Monday’s 109. Blaise was very aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Talking about the service games, Bicknell scored 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Blaise Bicknell was extremely efficient on serve to win 75% (48/64) of his 1st serve and 57% (20/35) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Blaise broke Monday twice after converting 25% of his break points (2/8).
Bicknell has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 57% of his matches (115-86). 15-7 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Bicknell has an aggregate76-47 win-loss record in the last 8 years on hard.
Blaise’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Laval and M25 Champaign.
The Jamaican has an overall 18-14 win-loss record in 2025, 15-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Salem Challenger
Bicknell has never competed in this tournament before.
Aidan Kim
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 16-11 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 28-9 | 17-6 | 6-2 | 5-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-17 | 4-7 | 11-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 9-10 | 7-3 | 0-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 606, the American reached the 2nd round after beating Ryuki Matsuda 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Kim had a good straight sets win against Matsuda (6-3 6-4). During the match Kim scored 57 points vs Matsuda’s 43. Aidan was quite aggressive to blast 22 winners.
About the serving games, Kim recorded 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Aidan Kim was exceptionally effective on serve to win 71% (22/31) of his 1st serve and 52% (11/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Aidan broke Matsuda 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
The American’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Dallas and M25 Edwardsville.
The American has an overall 9-6 win-loss record in 2025, 6-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Bicknell | Kim |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 34 | 19 |
| Pts | 112-109 | 57-43 |
| Total Points | 221 | 100 |
| Winners | 48 | 22 |
| %Winners | 43% | 39% |
Both Bicknell and Kim played 1 match. At the moment, Blaise Bicknell surrendered 1 set while Aidan Kim hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Bicknell has played 1 set more than Kim (3 vs 2). Therefore, Bicknell played 15 games more than Kim. Blaise scored 48 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Aidan recorded 22 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Bicknell | Kim |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 7 |
| 1st in | 64/99 | 31/52 |
| %1st in | 65% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 48/64 | 22/31 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 20/35 | 11/21 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 52% |
Bicknell made 4 aces . Kim struck 7 aces . Bicknell won 75% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Kim won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Bicknell | Kim |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 5 |
| Converted | 2/8 | 5/7 |
| % Converted | 25% | 71% |
| Conceded | 2 | 6 |
| Saved | 1 | 3 |
| % Saved | 50% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Blaise broke his opponent twice with a 25% conversion rate. Blaise lost his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Kim broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Bicknell | |||
| R1 Monday | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 5-7 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 34 | 34 | |
| pts | 112-109 | 112-109 | |
| Total points | 221 | 221 | |
| Winners | 48 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 64/99 | 64/99 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 48/64 | 48/64 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/35 | 20/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 2/8 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Kim | |||
| R1 Matsuda | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 57-43 | 57-43 | |
| Total points | 100 | 100 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 31/52 | 31/52 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 22/31 | 22/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/21 | 11/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Salem Challenger
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Cooper WilliamsWilliams (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Edward WinterWinter (6-2 4-6 7-66) – See score progression
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Quinn VandecasteeleVandecasteele – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Daniel MilavskyMilavsky (7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Aidan KimKim – Ryuki MatsudaMatsuda (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Darwin BlanchBlanch – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Rafael JodarJodar – Gavin GoodeGoode (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Luca PowPow – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Martin DammDamm – Emon Van Loben SelsVan Loben Sels (6-3 6-78 6-3) – See score progression
- Blaise BicknellBicknell – Johannus MondayMonday (6-4 5-7 7-5) – See score progression
- Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo – Garrett JohnsJohns (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Trevor SvajdaSvajda – Andre IlaganIlagan (2-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Tyler ZinkZink (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Darwin BlanchBlanch – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Quinn VandecasteeleVandecasteele – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Rafael JodarJodar – Gavin GoodeGoode (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Daniel MilavskyMilavsky (7-6(2) 6-4) – See score progression
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Cooper WilliamsWilliams (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alex RybakovRybakov – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction