Jack Pinnington Jones and Quinn Vandecasteele will play each other in the 2nd round of the Winston-Salem for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jack Pinnington Jones who should win in 2 sets.
Jack Pinnington Jones -> 1.147
Quinn Vandecasteele -> 4.95
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jack Pinnington Jones vs. Quinn Vandecasteele
This will be the 2nd time that Jack Pinnington Jones and Quinn Vandecasteele face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Pinnington Jones (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Pinnington Jones won 3-6 6-3 6-4 in the 2nd round in M25 Calabasas back in March 2025.
Jack Pinnington Jones
19 - 11win/loss
199
177
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 24-15 | 9-5 | 2-1 | 2-4 | 11-5 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 29-12 | 21-8 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 11-8 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-12 | 9-7 | 8-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-13 | 6-5 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 240, Pinnington Jones reached the 2nd round after beating Moerani Bouzige 6-1 6-4.
In the 1st round, Pinnington Jones had a good straight sets win against Bouzige (6-1 6-4). During the match, Pinnington Jones scored 64 points vs Bouzige’s 43. Jack was very aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Pinnington Jones bagged 7 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Jack Pinnington Jones conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 3 break points. Furthermore, Pinnington Jones put 66% of his first serves in, winning 83% (33/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (9/21) on the 2nd serve. Jack broke Bouzige 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Pinnington Jones has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 64% of his matches (98-56). 4-3 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Pinnington Jones has a composed48-27 record in the last 6 years on hard.
His best result of the year was conquering the title the Nottingham 3 Challenger where he defeated Kyle Edmund in the final 6-4 7-6(1).
Pinnington Jones has a composed 18-11 win-loss record in 2025, 4-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Salem Challenger
Pinnington Jones has never competed in this tournament before.
Quinn Vandecasteele
25 - 24win/loss
657
555
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-32 | 25-19 | 0-3 | 6-9 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 17-20 | 13-13 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-13 | 28-11 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 10-8 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 704, Quinn got to the 2nd round after defeating Andrew Fenty 6-3 6-2, Theo Papamalamis 7-5 7-6(2) and James Kent Trotter 6-2 6-4.
In the 1st round, Quinn had a good straight sets win against Kent Trotter (6-2 6-4). During the match Vandecasteele scored 64 points vs Kent Trotter’s 52. Vandecasteele was very aggressive to blast 27 winners.
About the serving games, Vandecasteele managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Quinn Vandecasteele lost the serve once and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Vandecasteele put 57% of his first serves in, winning 77% (27/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (12/26) on the 2nd serve. Vandecasteele broke Kent Trotter 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Vandecasteele’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Champaign.
Vandecasteele has a compiled 25-23 win-loss record in 2025, 21-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Pinnington Jones | Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 60 |
| Pts | 64-43 | 214-173 |
| Total Points | 107 | 387 |
| Winners | 33 | 79 |
| %Winners | 52% | 37% |
Pinnington Jones played 1 match while Vandecasteele competed in 3 matches. Vandecasteele started his run from the qualifications while Pinnington Jones had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Pinnington Jones has played 4 set(s) less than Vandecasteele (2 vs 6). Therefore, Pinnington Jones played 43 games less than Vandecasteele. Pinnington Jones scored 33 winners (52% of the total points). On the other side, Quinn made 79 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Pinnington Jones | Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 18 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 6 |
| 1st in | 40/61 | 111/191 |
| %1st in | 66% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 33/40 | 79/111 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 9/21 | 46/80 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 58% |
Pinnington Jones managed to score 7 aces . Vandecasteele made 18 aces (6 per match). Pinnington Jones won 83% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Vandecasteele won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Pinnington Jones | Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 12 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 12/25 |
| % Converted | 75% | 48% |
| Conceded | 3 | 14 |
| Saved | 3 | 9 |
| % Saved | 100% | 64% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 |
The Brit broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Pinnington Jones quite strong on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 3 break points. The American broke his opponents 12 times with a 48% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded.
| Pinnington Jones | |||
| R1 Bouzige | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 64-43 | 64-43 | |
| Total points | 107 | 107 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 52% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 40/61 | 40/61 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 33/40 | 33/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/21 | 9/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Vandecasteele | |||||
| Q1 Fenty | Q3 Papamalamis | R1 Kent | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 7-5 7-62 | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 25 | 18 | 60 | |
| pts | 66-44 | 84-77 | 64-52 | 214-173 | |
| Total points | 110 | 161 | 116 | 387 | |
| Winners | 23 | 29 | 27 | 79 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | 42% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 11 | 2 | 5 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 31/57 | 45/73 | 35/61 | 111/191 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 62% | 57% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 23/31 | 29/45 | 27/35 | 79/111 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 64% | 77% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/26 | 17/28 | 12/26 | 46/80 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 61% | 46% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 4 | 12 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/12 | 4/8 | 12/25 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 33% | 50% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 5 | 7 | 14 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 2/5 | 6/7 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 40% | 86% | 176% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | |
Tennis Scores in Salem Challenger
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Darwin BlanchBlanch – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Rafael JodarJodar – Gavin GoodeGoode (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Cooper WilliamsWilliams (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Edward WinterWinter (6-2 4-6 7-66) – See score progression
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Quinn VandecasteeleVandecasteele – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Daniel MilavskyMilavsky (7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Aidan KimKim – Ryuki MatsudaMatsuda (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Tyler ZinkZink (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Luca PowPow – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Martin DammDamm – Emon Van Loben SelsVan Loben Sels (6-3 6-78 6-3) – See score progression
- Blaise BicknellBicknell – Johannus MondayMonday (6-4 5-7 7-5) – See score progression
- Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo – Garrett JohnsJohns (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Trevor SvajdaSvajda – Andre IlaganIlagan (2-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Darwin BlanchBlanch – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Quinn VandecasteeleVandecasteele – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Rafael JodarJodar – Gavin GoodeGoode (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Daniel MilavskyMilavsky (7-6(2) 6-4) – See score progression
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Cooper WilliamsWilliams (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alex RybakovRybakov – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction