Martin Damm and Antoine Ghibaudo will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Winston-Salem for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Martin Damm who should win in 3 sets.
Martin Damm -> 1.68
Antoine Ghibaudo -> 2.09
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Martin Damm vs. Antoine Ghibaudo
There is no head to head record between Martin Damm and Antoine Ghibaudo since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Martin Damm
38 - 14win/loss
175
173
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 52-20 | 36-13 | 0-2 | 16-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 15-20 | 7-7 | 1-5 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-29 | 30-14 | 9-8 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-23 | 17-12 | 10-6 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-22 | 7-4 | 16-12 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 281, the American got to the 2nd round after defeating Emon Van Loben Sels 6-3 6-7(8) 6-3.
In the 1st round, Martin defeated Van Loben Sels (6-3 6-78 6-3). During the match, Damm scored 113 points vs Van Loben Sels’s 98. Damm was extremely aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Talking about the service games, Damm buried his opponent with 24 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Overall, Martin Damm was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 72% (51/71) of his 1st serve and 60% (25/42) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Martin broke Van Loben Sels 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Damm has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 59% of his matches (174-123). 36-11 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Damm has an overall100-54 match record in the last 7 years on hard.
The American’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh,M25 Tbilisi,M15 Vaasa and M25 Elvas.
Damm has a composed 38-14 win-loss record in 2025, 36-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Salem Challenger
Damm has never competed in this tournament before.
Antoine Ghibaudo
20 - 12win/loss
355
336
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-19 | 16-10 | 0-1 | 12-7 | 5-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 35-27 | 14-9 | 8-7 | 13-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-23 | 5-7 | 0-1 | 20-14 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 6-6 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 454, Antoine reached the 2nd round after beating Garrett Johns 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, The French player had a good straight sets win against Johns (6-3 6-4). During the match Ghibaudo scored 61 points vs Johns’s 45. Antoine was quite aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Ghibaudo made 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Antoine Ghibaudo was pretty efficient on serve to win 81% (30/37) of his 1st serve and 71% (12/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Ghibaudo was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Johns twice.
The French player best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Heraklion.
Antoine has an overall 20-12 win-loss record in 2025, 14-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Damm | Ghibaudo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 19 |
| Pts | 113-98 | 61-45 |
| Total Points | 211 | 106 |
| Winners | 51 | 30 |
| %Winners | 45% | 49% |
Both Damm and Ghibaudo played 1 match. At the moment, Martin Damm lost 1 set while Antoine Ghibaudo hasn’t dropped a set so far. Damm has played 1 set more than Ghibaudo (3 vs 2). Therefore, Damm played 12 games more than Ghibaudo. Damm scored 51 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The French player blasted 30 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Damm | Ghibaudo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 24 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 24 | 3 |
| 1st in | 71/113 | 37/54 |
| %1st in | 63% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 51/71 | 30/37 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 25/42 | 12/17 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 71% |
Damm fired 24 aces . Ghibaudo bagged 3 aces . Damm won 72% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Ghibaudo won 81% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 71% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Damm | Ghibaudo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 2 |
| Converted | 3/9 | 2/2 |
| % Converted | 33% | 100% |
| Conceded | 10 | 1 |
| Saved | 9 | 1 |
| % Saved | 90% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The American broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Martin surrendered his serve once and he saved 90% of the break points that he conceded. Ghibaudo broke his opponent twice with a 100% conversion rate. The French player was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Damm | |||
| R1 Van Loben Sels | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-78 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 113-98 | 113-98 | |
| Total points | 211 | 211 | |
| Winners | 51 | 51 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 24 | 24 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 71/113 | 71/113 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 51/71 | 51/71 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/42 | 25/42 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 9/10 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 90% | 90% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Ghibaudo | |||
| R1 Johns | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 61-45 | 61-45 | |
| Total points | 106 | 106 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 37/54 | 37/54 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 30/37 | 30/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/17 | 12/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 2/2 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores in Salem Challenger
- Darwin BlanchBlanch – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Aidan KimKim – Ryuki MatsudaMatsuda (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Rafael JodarJodar – Gavin GoodeGoode (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Edward WinterWinter (6-2 4-6 7-66) – See score progression
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Cooper WilliamsWilliams (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Daniel MilavskyMilavsky (7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Quinn VandecasteeleVandecasteele – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Tyler ZinkZink (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Trevor SvajdaSvajda – Andre IlaganIlagan (2-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Blaise BicknellBicknell – Johannus MondayMonday (6-4 5-7 7-5) – See score progression
- Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo – Garrett JohnsJohns (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Luca PowPow – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Martin DammDamm – Emon Van Loben SelsVan Loben Sels (6-3 6-78 6-3) – See score progression
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Quinn VandecasteeleVandecasteele – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Aidan KimKim – Ryuki MatsudaMatsuda (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Rafael JodarJodar – Gavin GoodeGoode (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Edward WinterWinter (6-2 4-6 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (7-6(3) 6-4) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Daniel MilavskyMilavsky (7-6(2) 6-4) – See score progression
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Cooper WilliamsWilliams (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alex RybakovRybakov – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-1) – H2H and prediction