Hynek Barton and Facundo Diaz Acosta will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Szczecin Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Facundo Diaz Acosta who should win in 3 sets.
Facundo Diaz Acosta -> 1.53
Hynek Barton -> 2.375
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Hynek Barton vs. Facundo Diaz Acosta
There is no head to head record between Hynek Barton and Facundo Diaz Acosta since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Hynek Barton
40 - 21win/loss
295
292
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 48-28 | 17-10 | 30-17 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-23 | 9-4 | 21-13 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2023 | 45-26 | 11-5 | 25-16 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 13-4 | 0-0 | 13-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 305, the Czech got to the 2nd round after defeating Roman Andres Burruchaga 5-7 6-4 7-5.
In the 1st round against Andres Burruchaga, The Czech recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-4 7-5). During the match, Barton scored 107 points vs Andres Burruchaga’s 101. Barton was pretty aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Regarding the service games, Barton scored 7 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Hynek Barton lost the serve 5 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Barton put 61% of his first serves in, winning 71% (45/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (17/40) on the 2nd serve. Hynek broke Andres Burruchaga 6 times after converting 46% of his break points (6/13).
Barton has a solid match record in the last 4 years having won 64% of his matches (129-74). 26-15 on clay in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Barton has a composed85-48 win-loss record in the last 4 years on clay.
Barton’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Doha,M25 Santa margherita di Pula and the Tampere Challenger.
Hynek has a composed 40-21 win-loss record in 2025, 26-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Szczecin Challenger
Facundo Diaz Acosta
11 - 13win/loss
226
47
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 21-20 | 4-4 | 17-15 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 19-22 | 3-8 | 16-10 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 50-25 | 4-4 | 46-20 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-21 | 0-1 | 31-19 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 43-30 | 7-4 | 36-26 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 314, Facundo got to the 2nd round after defeating Elias Ymer 6-2 6-1.
In the 1st round, Diaz had a good straight sets win against Ymer (6-2 6-1). During the match Diaz scored 60 points vs Ymer’s 34. Diaz was very aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about serving, Diaz recorded 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Facundo Diaz Acosta was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 78% (18/23) of his 1st serve and 64% (7/11) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Facundo broke Ymer 6 times after converting 43% of his break points (6/14).
The Argentine’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Trieste Challenger.
Facundo has a composed 11-13 win-loss record in 2025, 7-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Szczecin Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2022 and 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Barton | Diaz |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 34 | 15 |
| Pts | 107-101 | 60-34 |
| Total Points | 208 | 94 |
| Winners | 45 | 18 |
| %Winners | 42% | 30% |
Both Barton and Diaz played 1 match. At the moment, Hynek Barton surrendered 1 set while Facundo Diaz Acosta hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Barton has played 1 set more than Diaz (3 vs 2). Therefore, Barton played 19 games more than Diaz. Barton scored 45 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Facundo struck 18 winners (30%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Barton | Diaz |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 2 |
| 1st in | 63/103 | 23/34 |
| %1st in | 61% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 45/63 | 18/23 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 17/40 | 7/11 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 64% |
Barton struck 7 aces . Diaz made 2 aces . Barton won 71% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Diaz won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Barton | Diaz |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 6 |
| Converted | 6/13 | 6/14 |
| % Converted | 46% | 43% |
| Conceded | 12 | 2 |
| Saved | 7 | 1 |
| % Saved | 58% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 1 |
Hynek broke his opponent 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. Hynek lost his serve 5 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded. The Argentine broke his opponent 6 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Argentine conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Barton | |||
| R1 Andres | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 34 | 34 | |
| pts | 107-101 | 107-101 | |
| Total points | 208 | 208 | |
| Winners | 45 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 63/103 | 63/103 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 45/63 | 45/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/40 | 17/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/13 | 6/13 | |
| Converted % | 46% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 7/12 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 58% | 58% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Diaz | |||
| R1 Ymer | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 60-34 | 60-34 | |
| Total points | 94 | 94 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 23/34 | 23/34 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 18/23 | 18/23 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 7/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/14 | 6/14 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Tennis Scores in Szczecin Challenger
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (7-5 5-7 7-5) – See score progression
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (6-74 6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Tiago PereiraPereira – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (7-68 2-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Lorenzo BocchiBocchi (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Mateusz LangeLange (6-0 7-5) – See score progression
- Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (7-5 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Henri SquireSquire – Ivan GakhovGakhov (4-6 6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Alexey VatutinVatutin (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Dorian JuszczakJuszczak (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Alan WaznyWazny (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Hynek BartonBarton – Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga (5-7 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Elias YmerYmer (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Diego DeduraDedura – Luka PavlovicPavlovic (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Henri SquireSquire – Ivan GakhovGakhov (4-6 6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Mateusz LangeLange (6-0 7-5) – See score progression
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (7-5 5-7 7-5) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Lorenzo BocchiBocchi (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (7-5 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Tiago PereiraPereira – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (7-6(8) 2-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Alexey VatutinVatutin (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Henri SquireSquire (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – (0-0) – H2H and prediction