Francesco Passaro and Henri Squire will face off in the 2nd round of the Szczecin Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 3:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Francesco Passaro who should win in 3 sets.
Francesco Passaro -> 1.444
Henri Squire -> 2.61
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Francesco Passaro vs. Henri Squire
This will be the 2nd time that Francesco Passaro and Henri Squire clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Squire (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they fought against each other, Squire won 6-4 7-6(6) in the 1st round in the Bad Waltersdorf Challenger back in 2024.
Francesco Passaro
29 - 18win/loss
128
89
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 41-26 | 8-5 | 23-14 | 10-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-25 | 4-5 | 35-19 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 28-35 | 8-11 | 18-20 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 49-28 | 12-6 | 35-18 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 43-27 | 4-5 | 39-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 145, Passaro reached the 2nd round after defeating Dorian Juszczak 6-0 6-1.
In the 1st round, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Juszczak (6-0 6-1). During the match, Passaro scored 57 points vs Juszczak’s 26. Passaro was pretty aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about the service games, Passaro fired 4 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults. Francesco Passaro was exceptionally effective on serve to win 82% (18/22) of his 1st serve and 100% (6/6) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Italian broke Juszczak 6 times after converting 43% of his break points (6/14).
Passaro has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 58% of his matches (203-150). 21-12 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Passaro has an overall163-106 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
Passaro’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Sassuolo Challenger.
Passaro has a compiled 29-18 win-loss record in 2025, 21-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Szczecin Challenger
Francesco has never competed in this tournament before.
Henri Squire
29 - 26win/loss
274
169
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 41-32 | 1-3 | 31-21 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-31 | 1-3 | 21-13 | 19-12 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-38 | 7-4 | 30-25 | 15-6 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 38-31 | 1-2 | 8-11 | 27-16 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-12 | 0-0 | 21-8 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 5-3 |
Ranked no. 355, Henri got to the 2nd round after beating Szymon Kielan 6-1 6-4, Niklas Schell 6-2 6-2 and Ivan Gakhov 4-6 6-0 6-3.
In the 1st round against Gakhov, Squire recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-0 6-3). During the match Squire scored 92 points vs Gakhov’s 73. Henri was extremely aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about serving, Squire recorded 4 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Henri Squire lost the serve 3 times and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Squire put 68% of his first serves in, winning 73% (40/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (11/26) on the 2nd serve. Squire broke Gakhov 6 times after converting 38% of his break points (6/16).
Squire’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Kramsach,M25 Koksijde and the Augsburg Challenger.
The German has a compiled 29-26 win-loss record in 2025, 22-18 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Passaro | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 13 | 58 |
| Pts | 57-26 | 204-148 |
| Total Points | 83 | 352 |
| Winners | 18 | 97 |
| %Winners | 32% | 48% |
Passaro played 1 match while Squire competed in 3 matches. Squire started his run from the qualifications while Passaro had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Henri Squire conceded 1 set while Francesco Passaro hasn’t dropped a set so far. Passaro has played 5 set(s) less than Squire (2 vs 7). Therefore, Passaro played 45 games less than Squire. Passaro scored 18 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Henri blasted 97 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Passaro | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 3.7 |
| 1st in | 22/28 | 127/180 |
| %1st in | 79% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 18/22 | 97/127 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 6/6 | 26/53 |
| %2nd pts | 100% | 49% |
Passaro blasted 4 aces . Squire made 11 aces (3.7 per match). Passaro won 82% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 100% of the points. On the other side, Squire won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Passaro | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 13 |
| Converted | 6/14 | 13/28 |
| % Converted | 43% | 46% |
| Conceded | 0 | 14 |
| Saved | 0 | 11 |
| % Saved | 0% | 79% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Passaro broke his opponent 6 times with a 43% conversion rate. Francesco had a solid display on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. Squire broke his opponents 13 times with a 46% conversion rate. Henri conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded.
| Passaro | |||
| R1 Juszczak | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 57-26 | 57-26 | |
| Total points | 83 | 83 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 22/28 | 22/28 | |
| % 1st in | 79% | 79% | |
| 1st pts | 18/22 | 18/22 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/6 | 6/6 | |
| % 2nd pts | 100% | 100% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/14 | 6/14 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Squire | |||||
| Q1 Kielan | Q3 Schell | R1 Gakhov | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | 6-2 6-2 | 4-6 6-0 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 16 | 25 | 58 | |
| pts | 58-40 | 54-35 | 92-73 | 204-148 | |
| Total points | 98 | 89 | 165 | 352 | |
| Winners | 30 | 27 | 40 | 97 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 50% | 43% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 6 | 4 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 7 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 39/56 | 33/43 | 55/81 | 127/180 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 77% | 68% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 30/39 | 27/33 | 40/55 | 97/127 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 82% | 73% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 5/10 | 11/26 | 26/53 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 50% | 42% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 6 | 13 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 4/5 | 6/16 | 13/28 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 80% | 38% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 0 | 12 | 14 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 0/0 | 9/12 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 100% | – | 75% | 175% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Szczecin Challenger
- Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (7-5 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Henri SquireSquire – Ivan GakhovGakhov (4-6 6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Alexey VatutinVatutin (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (7-5 5-7 7-5) – See score progression
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (6-74 6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Tiago PereiraPereira – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (7-68 2-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Lorenzo BocchiBocchi (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Mateusz LangeLange (6-0 7-5) – See score progression
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Elias YmerYmer (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Diego DeduraDedura – Luka PavlovicPavlovic (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Dorian JuszczakJuszczak (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Alan WaznyWazny (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Hynek BartonBarton – Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga (5-7 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Henri SquireSquire – Ivan GakhovGakhov (4-6 6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Mateusz LangeLange (6-0 7-5) – See score progression
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (7-5 5-7 7-5) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Lorenzo BocchiBocchi (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (7-5 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Tiago PereiraPereira – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (7-6(8) 2-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Alexey VatutinVatutin (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Henri SquireSquire (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – (0-0) – H2H and prediction