James Kent Trotter and Quinn Vandecasteele will square off in the 1st round of the Winston-Salem for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 3:00 pm on COURT 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is James Kent Trotter who should win in 2 sets.
James Kent Trotter -> 1.25
Quinn Vandecasteele -> 3.64
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head James Kent Trotter vs. Quinn Vandecasteele
This will be the 2nd time that James Kent Trotter and Quinn Vandecasteele clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Kent Trotter (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they locked horns, Kent Trotter won 4-6 6-1 6-4 in the qualifications in the Winnipeg Challenger back in 2024.
James Kent Trotter
22 - 21win/loss
284
170
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-26 | 16-15 | 3-3 | 6-5 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-23 | 19-12 | 1-3 | 21-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-13 | 15-10 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-11 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 187, Kent Trotter got to the 1st round after beating William Grant 7-6(4) 6-1 and Strong Kirchheimer 7-6(3) 5-7 6-4.
In the qualifications, Kent Trotter defeated Kirchheimer (7-63 5-7 6-4). During the match, Kent Trotter scored 115 points vs Kirchheimer’s 114. James was exceptionally aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kent Trotter made 7 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. James Kent Trotter lost the serve twice and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Kent Trotter put 59% of his first serves in, winning 78% (51/65) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (22/45) on the 2nd serve. James broke Kirchheimer twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Kent Trotter started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has dropped 1 set in this tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Kent Trotter has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 59% of his matches (112-79). 13-12 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Kent Trotter has a composed65-46 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
Kent Trotter has a composed 22-20 win-loss record in 2025, 13-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Salem Challenger
James has never competed in this tournament before.
Quinn Vandecasteele
25 - 23win/loss
657
555
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-32 | 25-19 | 0-3 | 6-9 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 17-20 | 13-13 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-13 | 28-11 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 10-8 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 704, Quinn reached the 1st round after beating Andrew Fenty 6-3 6-2 and Theo Papamalamis 7-5 7-6(2).
In the qualifications, Vandecasteele had a good straight sets win against Papamalamis (7-5 7-62). During the match Vandecasteele scored 84 points vs Papamalamis’s 77. The American was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Vandecasteele blasted 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Quinn Vandecasteele lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Vandecasteele put 62% of his first serves in, winning 64% (29/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 61% (17/28) on the 2nd serve. Vandecasteele broke Papamalamis 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Vandecasteele started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Quinn’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Champaign.
Quinn has a composed 24-23 win-loss record in 2025, 20-15 on hard (See FULL STATS)
.H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kent Trotter | Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 55 | 42 |
| Pts | 185-163 | 150-121 |
| Total Points | 348 | 271 |
| Winners | 79 | 52 |
| %Winners | 43% | 35% |
Both Kent Trotter and Vandecasteele played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, James Kent Trotter surrendered 1 set while Quinn Vandecasteele hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Kent Trotter has played 1 set more than Vandecasteele (5 vs 4). Therefore, Kent Trotter played 13 games more than Vandecasteele. James scored 79 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The American made 52 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kent Trotter | Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 18 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 6.5 |
| 1st in | 96/158 | 76/130 |
| %1st in | 61% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 79/96 | 52/76 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 32/62 | 34/54 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 63% |
Kent Trotter managed to score 18 aces (9 per match). Vandecasteele made 13 aces (6.5 per match). Kent Trotter won 82% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Vandecasteele won 68% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kent Trotter | Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 8 |
| Converted | 6/14 | 8/17 |
| % Converted | 43% | 47% |
| Conceded | 9 | 7 |
| Saved | 6 | 3 |
| % Saved | 67% | 43% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
James broke his opponents 6 times with a 43% conversion rate. James surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Quinn broke his opponents 8 times with a 47% conversion rate. Vandecasteele conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kent Trotter | ||||
| Q1 Grant | Q3 Kirchheimer | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-1 | 7-63 5-7 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 35 | 55 | |
| pts | 70-49 | 115-114 | 185-163 | |
| Total points | 119 | 229 | 348 | |
| Winners | 28 | 51 | 79 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 44% | 43% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 11 | 7 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 31/48 | 65/110 | 96/158 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 59% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 28/31 | 51/65 | 79/96 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 78% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 22/45 | 32/62 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 49% | 52% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 2/7 | 6/14 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 29% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 8 | 9 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 6/8 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 75% | 38% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Vandecasteele | ||||
| Q1 Fenty | Q3 Papamalamis | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 7-5 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 25 | 42 | |
| pts | 66-44 | 84-77 | 150-121 | |
| Total points | 110 | 161 | 271 | |
| Winners | 23 | 29 | 52 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 11 | 2 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 31/57 | 45/73 | 76/130 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 62% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 23/31 | 29/45 | 52/76 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 64% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/26 | 17/28 | 34/54 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 61% | 63% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/12 | 8/17 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 33% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 5 | 7 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 2/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 40% | 45% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
Tennis Scores in Salem Challenger
- Luca PowPow – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Trevor SvajdaSvajda – Andre IlaganIlagan (2-6 6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Martin DammDamm – Emon Van Loben SelsVan Loben Sels (6-3 6-78 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Tyler ZinkZink (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Antoine GhibaudoGhibaudo – Garrett JohnsJohns (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Blaise BicknellBicknell – Johannus MondayMonday (6-4 5-7 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Christian LangmoLangmo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (1-1) – H2H and prediction