James Kent Trotter and Strong Kirchheimer will face off in the qualifications of the Winston-Salem for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 2:30 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is James Kent Trotter who should win in 2 sets.
James Kent Trotter -> 1.21
Strong Kirchheimer -> 4.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head James Kent Trotter vs. Strong Kirchheimer
This will be the 3rd time that James Kent Trotter and Strong Kirchheimer fight against each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Kent Trotter (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Kent Trotter won 7-6(5) 6-4 in the qualifications in the Granby Challenger back in 2023.
James Kent Trotter
22 - 20win/loss
284
170
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-26 | 16-15 | 3-3 | 6-5 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-23 | 19-12 | 1-3 | 21-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-13 | 15-10 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-11 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 187, the Japanese got to the qualifications after beating William Grant 7-6(4) 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Japanese had a good straight sets win against Grant (7-64 6-1). During the match, Kent Trotter scored 70 points vs Grant’s 49. The Japanese was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kent Trotter scored 11 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, James Kent Trotter was extremely effective on serve to win 90% (28/31) of his 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Kent Trotter broke Grant 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Kent Trotter has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 58% of his matches (111-79). 12-12 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Kent Trotter has an overall64-46 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
James has a composed 21-20 win-loss record in 2025, 12-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Salem Challenger
James has never competed in this tournament before.
Strong Kirchheimer
17 - 26win/loss
675
375
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 21-35 | 14-21 | 1-4 | 6-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 25-32 | 15-19 | 2-4 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-29 | 19-16 | 2-4 | 17-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-30 | 17-12 | 7-11 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-21 | 12-15 | 6-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 644, Strong got to the qualifications after beating Andrew Delgado 4-6 7-6(6) 6-1.
In the qualifications against Delgado, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-66 6-1). During the match Kirchheimer scored 92 points vs Delgado’s 84. Kirchheimer was very aggressive to blast 46 winners.
About the serving games, Kirchheimer fired 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Strong Kirchheimer was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 74% (46/62) of his 1st serve and 55% (18/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Strong broke Delgado 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Strong’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Southaven.
The American has a composed 17-25 win-loss record in 2025, 12-16 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kent Trotter | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 30 |
| Pts | 70-49 | 92-84 |
| Total Points | 119 | 176 |
| Winners | 28 | 46 |
| %Winners | 40% | 50% |
Both Kent Trotter and Kirchheimer played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Strong Kirchheimer surrendered 1 set while James Kent Trotter hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Kent Trotter has played 1 set(s) less than Kirchheimer (2 vs 3). Therefore, Kent Trotter played 10 games less than Kirchheimer. The Japanese scored 28 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Strong struck 46 winners (50%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kent Trotter | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 11 | 4 |
| 1st in | 31/48 | 62/95 |
| %1st in | 65% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 28/31 | 46/62 |
| %1st pts | 90% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 18/33 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 55% |
Kent Trotter recorded 11 aces . Kirchheimer bagged 4 aces . Kent Trotter won 90% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Kirchheimer won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kent Trotter | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 57% | 60% |
| Conceded | 1 | 4 |
| Saved | 0 | 2 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
The Japanese broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Kent Trotter surrendered his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Strong broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kent Trotter | |||
| Q1 Grant | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 70-49 | 70-49 | |
| Total points | 119 | 119 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 31/48 | 31/48 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 28/31 | 28/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 90% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Kirchheimer | |||
| Q1 Delgado | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-66 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 92-84 | 92-84 | |
| Total points | 176 | 176 | |
| Winners | 46 | 46 | |
| %Winners | 50% | 50% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 62/95 | 62/95 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 46/62 | 46/62 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/33 | 18/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Christian LangmoLangmo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andre IlaganIlagan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tyler ZinkZink – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction