Theo Papamalamis and Quinn Vandecasteele will play each other in the qualifications of the Winston-Salem for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:00 pm on COURT 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Theo Papamalamis who should win in 3 sets.
Theo Papamalamis -> 1.7
Quinn Vandecasteele -> 2.06
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Theo Papamalamis vs. Quinn Vandecasteele
There is no head to head record between Theo Papamalamis and Quinn Vandecasteele since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Theo Papamalamis
20 - 12win/loss
707
595
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 20-14 | 6-7 | 10-5 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 20-20 | 2-2 | 5-5 | 13-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2023 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 605, Papamalamis got to the qualifications after defeating Roger Pascual Ferra 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications, Papamalamis had a good straight sets win against Pascual Ferra (7-5 6-3). During the match, Papamalamis scored 76 points vs Pascual Ferra’s 61. Theo was pretty aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about the service games, Papamalamis recorded 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Theo Papamalamis lost the serve 3 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Papamalamis put 52% of his first serves in, winning 68% (23/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (18/32) on the 2nd serve. Theo broke Pascual Ferra 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Papamalamis has a winning win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 53% of his matches (44-39). 6-5 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Papamalamis has a compiled8-7 record in the last 4 years on hard.
The French player best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Ithaca.
The French player has a composed 20-11 win-loss record in 2025, 6-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Salem Challenger
Theo has never competed in this tournament before.
Quinn Vandecasteele
24 - 23win/loss
657
555
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-32 | 25-19 | 0-3 | 6-9 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 17-20 | 13-13 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-13 | 28-11 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 10-8 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 706, Quinn got to the qualifications after beating Andrew Fenty 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, Quinn had a good straight sets win against Fenty (6-3 6-2). During the match Vandecasteele scored 66 points vs Fenty’s 44. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Vandecasteele blasted 11 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Quinn Vandecasteele was extremely effective on serve to win 74% (23/31) of his 1st serve and 65% (17/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Quinn broke Fenty 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
The American’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Champaign.
Quinn has a compiled 23-23 win-loss record in 2025, 19-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Papamalamis | Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 17 |
| Pts | 76-61 | 66-44 |
| Total Points | 137 | 110 |
| Winners | 23 | 23 |
| %Winners | 30% | 35% |
Both Papamalamis and Vandecasteele played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Papamalamis and Vandecasteele have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Papamalamis played 4 games more than Vandecasteele. The French player scored 23 winners (30% of the total points). On the other side, Vandecasteele made 23 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Papamalamis | Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 11 |
| 1st in | 34/66 | 31/57 |
| %1st in | 52% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 23/34 | 23/31 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 18/32 | 17/26 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 65% |
Papamalamis blasted 5 aces . Vandecasteele fired 11 aces . Papamalamis won 68% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Vandecasteele won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Papamalamis | Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/10 | 4/5 |
| % Converted | 50% | 80% |
| Conceded | 4 | 2 |
| Saved | 1 | 1 |
| % Saved | 25% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
Papamalamis broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. Papamalamis lost his serve 3 times and he saved 25% of the break points that he conceded. Vandecasteele broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Vandecasteele conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Papamalamis | |||
| Q1 Pascual | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 76-61 | 76-61 | |
| Total points | 137 | 137 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 34/66 | 34/66 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 23/34 | 23/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/32 | 18/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 1/4 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 25% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Vandecasteele | |||
| Q1 Fenty | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 66-44 | 66-44 | |
| Total points | 110 | 110 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 31/57 | 31/57 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 23/31 | 23/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/26 | 17/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Christian LangmoLangmo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andre IlaganIlagan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tyler ZinkZink – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction