Dominick Mosejczuk and Edward Winter will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Winston-Salem for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT 5. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Edward Winter who should win in 2 sets.
Edward Winter -> 1.3
Dominick Mosejczuk -> 3.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Dominick Mosejczuk vs. Edward Winter
There is no head to head record between Dominick Mosejczuk and Edward Winter since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Dominick Mosejczuk
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2-6 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Dominick reached the qualifications after defeating Albert Pedrico Kravtsov 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, Dominick had a good straight sets win against Pedrico Kravtsov (6-3 6-1). During the match, Mosejczuk scored 62 points vs Pedrico Kravtsov’s 42. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Mosejczuk bagged 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Dominick Mosejczuk was exceptionally effective on serve to win 81% (25/31) of his 1st serve and 55% (11/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Pedrico Kravtsov 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Mosejczuk has a unfavourable win-loss record in the last 2 years having won 29% of his matches (2-5). 1-4 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Mosejczuk has an overall1-4 match record in the last 2 years on hard.
Mosejczuk has an overall 1-4 win-loss record in 2025, 1-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Salem Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Edward Winter
25 - 14win/loss
465
454
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 34-21 | 32-16 | 0-0 | 0-4 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 27-19 | 25-17 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-20 | 19-17 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 12-11 | 10-10 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 529, Edward got to the qualifications after defeating Corey Craig 6-1 6-0.
In the qualifications, Winter had a good straight sets win against Craig (6-1 6-0). During the match Winter scored 59 points vs Craig’s 28. Winter was quite aggressive to blast 18 winners.
About the serving games, Winter scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was very steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Edward Winter was extremely effective on serve to win 72% (18/25) of his 1st serve and 75% (9/12) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Australian broke Craig 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Edward’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Heraklion.
Edward has a composed 24-14 win-loss record in 2025, 22-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mosejczuk | Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 13 |
| Pts | 62-42 | 59-28 |
| Total Points | 104 | 87 |
| Winners | 25 | 18 |
| %Winners | 40% | 31% |
Both Mosejczuk and Winter played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Mosejczuk and Winter have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Mosejczuk played 3 games more than Winter. Mosejczuk scored 25 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian fired 18 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mosejczuk | Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 1 |
| 1st in | 31/51 | 25/37 |
| %1st in | 61% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 25/31 | 18/25 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 9/12 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 75% |
Mosejczuk blasted 2 aces . Winter scored 1 ace . Mosejczuk won 81% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Winter won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 75% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mosejczuk | Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 6 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 6/11 |
| % Converted | 67% | 55% |
| Conceded | 4 | 1 |
| Saved | 4 | 1 |
| % Saved | 100% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Mosejczuk broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Dominick had a solid display on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 4 break points. The Australian broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. The Australian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Mosejczuk | |||
| Q1 Pedrico | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 62-42 | 62-42 | |
| Total points | 104 | 104 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 31/51 | 31/51 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 25/31 | 25/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 11/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Winter | |||
| Q1 Craig | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 59-28 | 59-28 | |
| Total points | 87 | 87 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 25/37 | 25/37 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 18/25 | 18/25 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/12 | 9/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 75% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Christian LangmoLangmo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andre IlaganIlagan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tyler ZinkZink – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction