Damien Wenger and Maxime Chazal will play each other in the qualifications of the Biella Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:30 am on CAMPO 4 SERVIZI E SETA. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Maxime Chazal who should win in 3 sets.
Maxime Chazal -> 1.68
Damien Wenger -> 2.08
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Damien Wenger vs. Maxime Chazal
This will be the 3rd time that Damien Wenger and Maxime Chazal fight against each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Chazal (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on clay.
The last time that they locked horns, Chazal won 6-4 6-3 in the semifinal in M25 Grasse back in 2024.
Damien Wenger
29 - 14win/loss
616
363
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 32-18 | 2-3 | 27-12 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2024 | 34-23 | 4-2 | 30-21 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-26 | 0-0 | 46-24 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 46-24 | 0-0 | 46-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 63-22 | 0-0 | 63-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 582, Damien got to the qualifications after defeating Juan Cruz Martin Manzano 7-5 1-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, Damien defeated Cruz Martin Manzano (7-5 1-6 6-4).During the match, Wenger scored less points (4) than Cruz Martin Manzano. In fact, the world no. 582 won 83 points vs Cruz Martin Manzano’s. That means that Wenger was more focused during the important points. Damien was exceptionally aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Wenger couldn’t to score even 1 ace in the match and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults. Damien Wenger lost the serve 6 times. Furthermore, Wenger put 54% of his first serves in, winning 57% (24/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (20/36) on the 2nd serve. Wenger broke Cruz Martin Manzano 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Wenger has a solid win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 65% of his matches (297-162). 27-10 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Wenger has an aggregate282-142 match record in the last 9 years on clay.
Wenger’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Alaminos and M15 Casablanca.
The Swiss has a compiled 29-14 win-loss record in 2025, 27-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Biella Challenger
Damien has never competed in this tournament before.
Maxime Chazal
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 32-25 | 0-0 | 32-25 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-26 | 0-3 | 39-17 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-29 | 13-10 | 31-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-27 | 3-2 | 35-25 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 9-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 591, Maxime reached the qualifications after defeating Tymur Bieldiugin 6-1 6-4
.In the qualifications, Maxime had a good straight sets win against Bieldiugin (6-1 6-4). During the match Chazal scored 65 points vs Bieldiugin’s 44. Chazal was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Chazal scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 7 double faults. Maxime Chazal lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Chazal put 56% of his first serves in, winning 79% (26/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (12/26) on the 2nd serve. Maxime broke Bieldiugin 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
The French player best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Cap d’Agde.
The French player has a compiled 24-18 win-loss record in 2025, 24-18 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Wenger | Chazal |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 17 |
| Pts | 83-87 | 65-44 |
| Total Points | 170 | 109 |
| Winners | 24 | 26 |
| %Winners | 29% | 40% |
Both Wenger and Chazal played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Damien Wenger dropped 1 set while Maxime Chazal hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Wenger has played 1 set more than Chazal (3 vs 2). Therefore, Wenger played 12 games more than Chazal. Wenger scored 24 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, Maxime fired 26 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Wenger | Chazal |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 1 |
| 1st in | 42/78 | 33/59 |
| %1st in | 54% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 24/42 | 26/33 |
| %1st pts | 57% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 20/36 | 12/26 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 46% |
Wenger didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Chazal made 1 ace . Wenger won 57% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Chazal won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Wenger | Chazal |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| % Converted | 50% | 50% |
| Conceded | 6 | 7 |
| Saved | 0 | 5 |
| % Saved | 0% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 6 | 2 |
The Swiss broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Swiss dropped his serve 6 times and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Maxime broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. Maxime conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
| Wenger | |||
| Q1 Cruz Martin Manzano | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 1-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 83-87 | 83-87 | |
| Total points | 170 | 170 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 42/78 | 42/78 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 24/42 | 24/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 57% | 57% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/36 | 20/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 0/6 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 6 | |
| Chazal | |||
| Q1 Bieldiugin | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 65-44 | 65-44 | |
| Total points | 109 | 109 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 33/59 | 33/59 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 26/33 | 26/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/26 | 12/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dennis NovakNovak – Sandro KoppKopp (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Damien WengerWenger – Maxime ChazalChazal (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico IannacconeIannaccone – Buvaysar GadamauriGadamauri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex MartinezMartinez – Giovanni OradiniOradini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eric VanshelboimVanshelboim – Jelle SelsSels (1-0) – H2H and prediction