Joel Schwaerzler and Sumit Nagal will square off in the quarter of the Tulln Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Joel Schwaerzler who should win in 3 sets.
Joel Schwaerzler -> 1.63
Sumit Nagal -> 2.17
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Joel Schwaerzler vs. Sumit Nagal
There is no head to head record between Joel Schwaerzler and Sumit Nagal since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Joel Schwaerzler
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 39-26 | 0-0 | 39-25 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 25-23 | 3-3 | 21-16 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 6-9 | 1-2 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 262 (career-high), Schwaerzler got to the quarter after defeating Tiago Pereira 6-4 3-6 6-3 and Jan Choinski 7-6(3) 6-2.
In the 2nd round, The Austrian had a good straight sets win against Choinski (7-63 6-2). During the match, Schwaerzler scored 76 points vs Choinski’s 63. The Austrian was extremely aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Regarding the service games, Schwaerzler managed to score 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Joel Schwaerzler was exceptionally effective on serve to win 80% (36/45) of his 1st serve and 56% (15/27) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Austrian broke Choinski twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Schwaerzler has surrendered 1 set in this tournament to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Schwaerzler has a winning win-loss record in the last 3 years having won 56% of his matches (68-53). 37-21 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Schwaerzler has a composed63-44 win-loss record in the last 3 years on clay.
Schwaerzler’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Klosters,Lucciana and the Sofia 2 Challenger.
Joel has a compiled 37-21 win-loss record in 2025, 37-21 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tulln Challenger
Sumit Nagal
23 - 23win/loss
273
68
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 34-27 | 2-3 | 30-23 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 32-29 | 15-13 | 16-11 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 293, Nagal reached the quarter after defeating Mili Poljicak 6-4 6-2 and Filip Cristian Jianu 6-3 6-4.
In the 2nd round, The Indian had a good straight sets win against Cristian Jianu (6-3 6-4). During the match Nagal scored 62 points vs Cristian Jianu’s 49. Nagal was pretty aggressive to blast 22 winners.
About the serving games, Nagal scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Sumit Nagal was very effective on serve to win 71% (22/31) of his 1st serve and 53% (10/19) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Indian broke Cristian Jianu 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Sumit hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
The Indian’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Trieste Challenger and the Tampere Challenger.
The Indian has a composed 23-23 win-loss record in 2025, 21-19 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tulln Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the final in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Schwaerzler | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 49 | 37 |
| Pts | 157-133 | 124-97 |
| Total Points | 290 | 221 |
| Winners | 66 | 55 |
| %Winners | 42% | 44% |
Both Schwaerzler and Nagal played 2 matches. At the moment, Joel Schwaerzler lost 1 set while Sumit Nagal hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Schwaerzler has played 1 set more than Nagal (5 vs 4). Therefore, Schwaerzler played 12 games more than Nagal. The Austrian scored 66 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The Indian fired 55 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Schwaerzler | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 5.5 | 0.5 |
| 1st in | 82/141 | 72/105 |
| %1st in | 58% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 66/82 | 55/72 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 39/59 | 17/33 |
| %2nd pts | 66% | 52% |
Schwaerzler scored 11 aces (5.5 per match). Nagal made 1 ace (0.5 per match). Schwaerzler won 80% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 66% of the points. On the other side, Nagal won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Schwaerzler | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 8 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 8/18 |
| % Converted | 57% | 44% |
| Conceded | 6 | 4 |
| Saved | 5 | 2 |
| % Saved | 83% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Joel broke his opponents 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Schwaerzler dropped his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. Sumit broke his opponents 8 times with a 44% conversion rate. Nagal conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Schwaerzler | ||||
| R1 Pereira | R2 Choinski | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | 7-63 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 21 | 49 | |
| pts | 81-70 | 76-63 | 157-133 | |
| Total points | 151 | 139 | 290 | |
| Winners | 30 | 36 | 66 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 47% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 7 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 37/69 | 45/72 | 82/141 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 63% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 30/37 | 36/45 | 66/82 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/32 | 15/27 | 39/59 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 56% | 66% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 2/5 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 40% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 4/4 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 100% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Nagal | ||||
| R1 Poljicak | R2 Cristian | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 19 | 37 | |
| pts | 62-48 | 62-49 | 124-97 | |
| Total points | 110 | 111 | 221 | |
| Winners | 33 | 22 | 55 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 35% | 44% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 41/55 | 31/50 | 72/105 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 62% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 33/41 | 22/31 | 55/72 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 71% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/14 | 10/19 | 17/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 53% | 52% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 8 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 5/11 | 8/18 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 45% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 0/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 0% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Sandro KoppKopp (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction