Daniil Glinka and Hamish Stewart will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Cassis Challenger for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 10:00 am on COURT 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hamish Stewart who should win in 3 sets.
Hamish Stewart -> 1.76
Daniil Glinka -> 1.98
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Daniil Glinka vs. Hamish Stewart
This will be the 4th time that Daniil Glinka and Hamish Stewart fight against each other. The head to head is 3-0 for Glinka (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played each other, Glinka won 6-3 6-4 in the semifinal in M15 Budapest back in 2024.
Daniil Glinka
36 - 18win/loss
191
191
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 60-23 | 25-14 | 0-0 | 30-9 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2024 | 37-29 | 19-14 | 0-1 | 14-12 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 2023 | 40-23 | 18-14 | 0-1 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
| 2022 | 23-29 | 17-22 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 29-31 | 9-14 | 12-11 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 347 (career-high), Glinka reached the 2nd round after beating Quentin Halys 6-4 1-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, Glinka defeated Halys (6-4 1-6 6-3).During the match, Glinka scored less points (4) than Halys. In fact, the world no. 347 won 79 points vs Halys’s. That means that Glinka was more focused during the important points. The Estonian was pretty aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about the service games, Glinka bagged 10 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Daniil Glinka lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Glinka put 62% of his first serves in, winning 68% (34/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 61% (19/31) on the 2nd serve. The Estonian broke Halys twice after converting 22% of his break points (2/9).
Glinka has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 55% of his matches (212-172). 19-12 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Glinka has an overall104-93 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
Glinka’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Trento and M25 Trimbach.
Glinka has a composed 36-18 win-loss record in 2025, 19-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cassis Challenger
Hamish Stewart
47 - 21win/loss
340
340
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 63-30 | 21-14 | 0-0 | 30-11 | 5-3 | 7-2 |
| 2024 | 26-20 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 17-10 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-21 | 23-13 | 0-0 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2022 | 20-7 | 14-5 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 442 (career-high), Stewart reached the 2nd round after defeating Leo Raquillet 6-2 6-3, Egor Gerasimov 6-4 1-6 6-3 and Dan Added 6-3 7-6(8).
In the 1st round, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Added (6-3 7-68). During the match Stewart scored 85 points vs Added’s 78. Stewart was pretty aggressive to blast 32 winners.
About the serving games, Stewart recorded 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Hamish Stewart was pretty efficient on serve to win 71% (32/45) of his 1st serve and 59% (16/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Hamish broke Added 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
The Brit’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Cadolzburg,M15 Bucharest,M15 Poitiers and M15 Sharm ElSheikh.
Hamish has an aggregate 47-21 win-loss record in 2025, 19-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Glinka | Stewart |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 65 |
| Pts | 79-83 | 209-180 |
| Total Points | 162 | 389 |
| Winners | 34 | 87 |
| %Winners | 43% | 42% |
Glinka played 1 match while Stewart competed in 3 matches. Stewart started his run from the qualifications while Glinka had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Daniil Glinka dropped 1 set, while Hamish Stewart dropped 1 set. Glinka has played 4 set(s) less than Stewart (3 vs 7). Therefore, Glinka played 39 games less than Stewart. Glinka scored 34 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Hamish scored 87 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Glinka | Stewart |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 18 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 6 |
| 1st in | 50/81 | 115/180 |
| %1st in | 62% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 34/50 | 87/115 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 19/31 | 41/65 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 63% |
Glinka bagged 10 aces . Stewart struck 18 aces (6 per match). Glinka won 68% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Stewart won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Glinka | Stewart |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 9 |
| Converted | 2/9 | 9/21 |
| % Converted | 22% | 43% |
| Conceded | 7 | 9 |
| Saved | 5 | 6 |
| % Saved | 71% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
The Estonian broke his opponent twice with a 22% conversion rate. Glinka dropped his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Stewart broke his opponents 9 times with a 43% conversion rate. Hamish conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Glinka | |||
| R1 Halys | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 79-83 | 79-83 | |
| Total points | 162 | 162 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 50/81 | 50/81 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 34/50 | 34/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/31 | 19/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/9 | 2/9 | |
| Converted % | 22% | 22% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Stewart | |||||
| Q1 Raquillet | Q3 Gerasimov | R1 Added | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | 6-3 7-68 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 26 | 22 | 65 | |
| pts | 60-31 | 64-71 | 85-78 | 209-180 | |
| Total points | 91 | 135 | 163 | 389 | |
| Winners | 20 | 35 | 32 | 87 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 55% | 38% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 4 | 6 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 20/36 | 50/72 | 45/72 | 115/180 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 69% | 63% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 20/20 | 35/50 | 32/45 | 87/115 | |
| % 1st pts | 100% | 70% | 71% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/16 | 13/22 | 16/27 | 41/65 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 59% | 59% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 2/3 | 3/9 | 9/21 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 67% | 33% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 3/5 | 3/4 | 6 | |
| Saved % | – | 60% | 75% | 135% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Cassis Challenger
- Justin EngelEngel – Jakub PaulPaul (6-73 7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Olaf PieczkowskiPieczkowski (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Robin BertrandBertrand – Edas ButvilasButvilas (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Matteo MartineauMartineau (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Quentin HalysHalys (6-4 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – Filippo MoroniMoroni (6-74 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Mark LajalLajal – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Eliakim CoulibalyCoulibaly – Kenny de Schepperde Schepper (7-5 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Tom ParisParis – Olle WallinWallin (6-2 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Hamish StewartStewart – Dan AddedAdded (6-3 7-68) – See score progression
- Mae MaligeMalige – Benoit PairePaire (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Clement ChidekhChidekh (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Etienne DonnetDonnet – Sascha Gueymard WayenburgGueymard Wayenburg (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur FeryFery – Michael GeertsGeerts (7-65 6-2) – See score progression
- Michael MmohMmoh – Lucas PoullainPoullain (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Timofey SkatovSkatov (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Arthur Reymond/Luca SanchezReymond/Luca Sanchez – Sekou Bangoura/Robin BertrandBangoura/Robin Bertrand (4-6 6-3 11-9) – See score progression
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Quentin HalysHalys (6-4 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Hamish StewartStewart – Dan AddedAdded (6-3 7-6(8)) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Matteo MartineauMartineau (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Robin BertrandBertrand – Edas ButvilasButvilas (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Mae MaligeMalige – Benoit PairePaire (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Eliakim CoulibalyCoulibaly – Kenny de Schepperde Schepper (7-5 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – Filippo MoroniMoroni (6-7(4) 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Justin EngelEngel – Jakub PaulPaul (6-7(3) 7-6(5) 6-1) – See score progression
- Mark LajalLajal – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Valentin VacherotVacherot (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Hamish StewartStewart (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Etienne DonnetDonnet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction