Stefano Travaglia and Gianluca Cadenasso will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Genova Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Stefano Travaglia who should win in 2 sets.
Stefano Travaglia -> 1.33
Gianluca Cadenasso -> 3.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Stefano Travaglia vs. Gianluca Cadenasso
There is no head to head record between Stefano Travaglia and Gianluca Cadenasso since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Stefano Travaglia
27 - 17win/loss
207
60
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 38-24 | 0-2 | 32-20 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-34 | 5-6 | 24-22 | 4-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-37 | 9-7 | 29-24 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-27 | 5-8 | 2-11 | 10-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-28 | 7-7 | 20-14 | 4-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 208, Travaglia got to the 2nd round after beating Duje Ajdukovic 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Stefano had a good straight sets win against Ajdukovic (6-3 6-4). During the match, Travaglia scored 72 points vs Ajdukovic’s 54. Stefano was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Travaglia struck 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Stefano Travaglia was exceptionally effective on serve to win 73% (29/40) of his 1st serve and 59% (13/22) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Italian broke Ajdukovic 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Travaglia has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (364-247). 27-16 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Travaglia has a compiled 252-145 record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Modena Challenger where he beat Thiago Seyboth Wild in the final 6-4 6-3.
Stefano has a compiled 27-17 win-loss record in 2025, 27-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Genova Challenger
Gianluca Cadenasso
24 - 16win/loss
395
365
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 47-22 | 5-4 | 42-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 49-23 | 0-0 | 49-23 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 20-11 | 14-5 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 9-8 | 5-3 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 531, Cadenasso reached the 2nd round after defeating Franco Agamenone 6-4 2-6 6-2, Giovanni Oradini 6-3 4-6 6-3 and Nicolai Budkov Kjaer 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Cadenasso had a good straight sets win against Budkov Kjaer (6-4 6-4). During the match Cadenasso scored 71 points vs Budkov Kjaer’s 57. The Italian was pretty aggressive to blast 27 winners.
About the serving games, Cadenasso couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Gianluca Cadenasso lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Cadenasso put 63% of his first serves in, winning 68% (27/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 71% (17/24) on the 2nd serve. The Italian broke Budkov Kjaer 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
The Italian’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Store.
Gianluca has an overall 24-16 win-loss record in 2025, 19-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Genova Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Travaglia | Cadenasso |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 74 |
| Pts | 72-54 | 250-221 |
| Total Points | 126 | 471 |
| Winners | 29 | 75 |
| %Winners | 40% | 30% |
Travaglia played 1 match while Cadenasso competed in 3 matches. Cadenasso started his run from the qualifications while Travaglia had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Gianluca Cadenasso conceded 2 sets while Stefano Travaglia hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Travaglia has played 6 set(s) less than Cadenasso (2 vs 8). Therefore, Travaglia played 55 games less than Cadenasso. Travaglia scored 29 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Cadenasso fired 75 winners (30%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Travaglia | Cadenasso |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 0 |
| 1st in | 40/62 | 125/221 |
| %1st in | 65% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 29/40 | 75/125 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 60% |
| 2nd pts | 13/22 | 57/96 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 59% |
Travaglia bagged 5 aces . Cadenasso didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Travaglia won 73% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Cadenasso won 60% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Travaglia | Cadenasso |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 16 |
| Converted | 3/9 | 16/41 |
| % Converted | 33% | 39% |
| Conceded | 5 | 22 |
| Saved | 4 | 11 |
| % Saved | 80% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 11 |
Travaglia broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Stefano surrendered his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Cadenasso broke his opponents 16 times with a 39% conversion rate. Cadenasso conceded his serve 11 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Travaglia | |||
| R1 Ajdukovic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 72-54 | 72-54 | |
| Total points | 126 | 126 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 40/62 | 40/62 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 29/40 | 29/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/22 | 13/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Cadenasso | |||||
| Q1 Agamenone | Q3 Oradini | R1 Budkov | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 2-6 6-2 | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 28 | 20 | 74 | |
| pts | 95-89 | 84-75 | 71-57 | 250-221 | |
| Total points | 184 | 159 | 128 | 471 | |
| Winners | 20 | 28 | 27 | 75 | |
| %Winners | 21% | 33% | 38% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 5 | 2 | 15 | |
| 1st in | 40/78 | 45/79 | 40/64 | 125/221 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 57% | 63% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 20/40 | 28/45 | 27/40 | 75/125 | |
| % 1st pts | 50% | 62% | 68% | 60% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/38 | 20/34 | 17/24 | 57/96 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 59% | 71% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 7 | 6 | 3 | 16 | |
| Converted | 7/20 | 6/11 | 3/10 | 16/41 | |
| Converted % | 35% | 55% | 30% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 14 | 5 | 3 | 22 | |
| Saved | 8/14 | 1/5 | 2/3 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 20% | 67% | 144% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 4 | 1 | 11 | |
Tennis Scores in Genova Challenger
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (6-3 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tom GentzschGentzsch – Francesco FortiForti (7-5 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Andrea PicchionePicchione – Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza (w/o) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Kilian FeldbauschFeldbausch – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (0-0) – H2H and prediction