Oleg Prihodko and Rudolf Molleker will play each other in the 2nd round of the Tulln Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 11:00 am on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Rudolf Molleker who should win in 3 sets.
Rudolf Molleker -> 1.67
Oleg Prihodko -> 2.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Oleg Prihodko vs. Rudolf Molleker
There is no head to head record between Oleg Prihodko and Rudolf Molleker since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Oleg Prihodko
23 - 25win/loss
402
307
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 26-28 | 0-3 | 18-17 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2024 | 64-17 | 8-4 | 44-9 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2023 | 26-27 | 8-4 | 18-21 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 45-32 | 2-3 | 43-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 43-33 | 4-3 | 39-30 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 309, Prihodko got to the 2nd round after defeating Lukas Neumayer 1-6 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round against Neumayer, The Ukrainian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 6-3 6-4).During the match, Prihodko scored less points (4) than Neumayer. In fact, the world no. 309 won 73 points vs Neumayer’s. That means that Prihodko was more focused during the important points. The Ukrainian was very aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about the service games, Prihodko managed to score 6 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Oleg Prihodko lost the serve 3 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Prihodko put 65% of his first serves in, winning 74% (37/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (11/27) on the 2nd serve. Prihodko broke Neumayer 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Prihodko has positive win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (344-249). 16-15 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Prihodko has an aggregate 274-193 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Oleg’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Nussloch.
The Ukrainian has an overall 23-25 win-loss record in 2025, 16-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tulln Challenger
Rudolf Molleker
28 - 21win/loss
424
146
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37-28 | 5-3 | 26-17 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 28-34 | 4-8 | 15-18 | 7-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-35 | 2-3 | 42-25 | 6-5 | 0-1 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 47-28 | 2-1 | 45-24 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 8-23 | 0-1 | 6-16 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 386, the German got to the 2nd round after beating Bastian Berenz 6-2 6-1, Sebastian Gima 6-4 6-2 and David Poljak 7-6(6) 4-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, The German defeated Poljak (7-66 4-6 6-3). During the match Molleker scored 122 points vs Poljak’s 111. The German was extremely aggressive to blast 50 winners.
About the serving games, Molleker made 3 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Rudolf Molleker lost the serve 4 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Molleker put 65% of his first serves in, winning 71% (50/70) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (19/38) on the 2nd serve. Molleker broke Poljak 4 times after converting 27% of his break points (4/15).
The German’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Bol.
Molleker has an aggregate 28-21 win-loss record in 2025, 23-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tulln Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the semifinal in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Prihodko | Molleker |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 65 |
| Pts | 73-77 | 240-184 |
| Total Points | 150 | 424 |
| Winners | 37 | 99 |
| %Winners | 51% | 41% |
Prihodko played 1 match while Molleker competed in 3 matches. Molleker started his run from the qualifications while Prihodko had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Oleg Prihodko dropped 1 set, while Rudolf Molleker lost 1 set. Prihodko has played 4 set(s) less than Molleker (3 vs 7). Therefore, Prihodko played 39 games less than Molleker. Oleg scored 37 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, Molleker fired 99 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Prihodko | Molleker |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 2.7 |
| 1st in | 50/77 | 130/196 |
| %1st in | 65% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 37/50 | 99/130 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 11/27 | 35/66 |
| %2nd pts | 41% | 53% |
Prihodko blasted 6 aces . Molleker recorded 8 aces (2.7 per match). Prihodko won 74% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 41% of the points. On the other side, Molleker won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Prihodko | Molleker |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 13 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 13/29 |
| % Converted | 75% | 45% |
| Conceded | 4 | 14 |
| Saved | 1 | 9 |
| % Saved | 25% | 64% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 5 |
Prihodko broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. The Ukrainian surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 25% of the break points that he conceded. Rudolf broke his opponents 13 times with a 45% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded.
| Prihodko | |||
| R1 Neumayer | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 73-77 | 73-77 | |
| Total points | 150 | 150 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 50/77 | 50/77 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 37/50 | 37/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/27 | 11/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 1/4 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 25% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Molleker | |||||
| Q1 Berenz | Q3 Gima | R1 Poljak | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | 6-4 6-2 | 7-66 4-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 18 | 32 | 65 | |
| pts | 58-31 | 60-42 | 122-111 | 240-184 | |
| Total points | 89 | 102 | 233 | 424 | |
| Winners | 20 | 29 | 50 | 99 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 48% | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 6 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 26/41 | 34/47 | 70/108 | 130/196 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 72% | 65% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 20/26 | 29/34 | 50/70 | 99/130 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 85% | 71% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/15 | 8/13 | 19/38 | 35/66 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 62% | 50% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 3 | 4 | 13 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 3/4 | 4/15 | 13/29 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 75% | 27% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 1 | 10 | 14 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 1/1 | 6/10 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 100% | 60% | 227% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | |
Tennis Scores in Tulln Challenger
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Luka MikrutMikrut (7-64 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sandro KoppKopp – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (1-6 7-62 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sumit NagalNagal – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Joel SchwaerzlerSchwaerzler – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (7-63 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Sandro KoppKopp (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kai WehneltWehnelt – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko (0-0) – H2H and prediction