Bernard Tomic and Tsung-Hao Huang will play each other in the 2nd round of the Shanghai Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 3:00 pm on COURT 4. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Bernard Tomic who should win in 2 sets.
Bernard Tomic -> 1.3
Tsung-Hao Huang -> 3.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Bernard Tomic vs. Tsung-Hao Huang
There is no head to head record between Bernard Tomic and Tsung-Hao Huang since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Bernard Tomic
31 - 25win/loss
182
17
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 42-33 | 29-23 | 6-7 | 2-1 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 50-29 | 34-19 | 12-5 | 4-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-27 | 35-19 | 4-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-12 | 24-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-12 | 4-4 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 168, Tomic reached the 2nd round after beating Yaojie Zeng 6-4 6-1.
In the 1st round, Tomic had a good straight sets win against Zeng (6-4 6-1). During the match, Tomic scored 62 points vs Zeng’s 36. The Australian was pretty aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Tomic scored just 1 ace in the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Bernard Tomic was quite effective on serve to win 82% (27/33) of his 1st serve and 68% (13/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Australian broke Zeng 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Tomic has positive match record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (248-199). 20-16 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Tomic has an overall 162-108 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Tomic’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Lexington Challenger and the Barranquilla Challenger.
Tomic has a compiled 31-25 win-loss record in 2025, 20-16 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Shanghai Challenger
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
Tsung-Hao Huang
35 - 22win/loss
479
474
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 41-32 | 39-28 | 1-1 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 26-30 | 25-28 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 26-21 | 23-19 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-21 | 28-17 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 5-9 | 5-6 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 550, Tsung-Hao got to the 2nd round after beating Moerani Bouzige 7-6(3) 6-3, Sergey Fomin 6-3 6-2 and Yan Bai 6-3 6-0.
In the 1st round, Tsung-Hao had a good straight sets win against Bai (6-3 6-0). During the match Huang scored 59 points vs Bai’s 29. Huang was exceptionally aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about serving, Huang scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was very steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Tsung-Hao Huang was quite effective on serve to win 72% (18/25) of his 1st serve and 72% (13/18) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Chinese was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Bai 5 times.
Tsung-Hao’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Osaka and M15 Luan.
The Chinese has a composed 35-22 win-loss record in 2025, 34-20 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tomic | Huang |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 54 |
| Pts | 62-36 | 204-141 |
| Total Points | 98 | 345 |
| Winners | 27 | 87 |
| %Winners | 44% | 43% |
Tomic played 1 match while Huang competed in 3 matches. Huang started his run from the qualifications while Tomic had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Tomic has played 4 set(s) less than Huang (2 vs 6). Therefore, Tomic played 37 games less than Huang. The Australian scored 27 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Huang bagged 87 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tomic | Huang |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 3.7 |
| 1st in | 33/52 | 117/181 |
| %1st in | 63% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 27/33 | 87/117 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 13/19 | 45/64 |
| %2nd pts | 68% | 70% |
Tomic fired 1 ace . Huang also fired 11 aces (3.7 per match). Tomic won 82% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points. On the other side, Huang won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 70% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tomic | Huang |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 9 |
| Converted | 3/6 | 9/14 |
| % Converted | 50% | 64% |
| Conceded | 2 | 7 |
| Saved | 2 | 6 |
| % Saved | 100% | 86% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The Australian broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Tomic was rock solid on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 2 break points. The Chinese broke his opponents 9 times with a 64% conversion rate. Huang conceded his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
| Tomic | |||
| R1 Zeng | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 62-36 | 62-36 | |
| Total points | 98 | 98 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 33/52 | 33/52 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 27/33 | 27/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/19 | 13/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Huang | |||||
| Q1 Bouzige | Q3 Fomin | R1 Bai | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-3 | 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 17 | 15 | 54 | |
| pts | 84-65 | 61-47 | 59-29 | 204-141 | |
| Total points | 149 | 108 | 88 | 345 | |
| Winners | 42 | 27 | 18 | 87 | |
| %Winners | 50% | 44% | 31% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 2 | 1 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 53/73 | 39/65 | 25/43 | 117/181 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 60% | 58% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 42/53 | 27/39 | 18/25 | 87/117 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 69% | 72% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/20 | 18/26 | 13/18 | 45/64 | |
| % 2nd pts | 70% | 69% | 72% | 70% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 1 | 3 | 5 | 9 | |
| Converted | 1/3 | 3/6 | 5/5 | 9/14 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 50% | 100% | 64% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 5 | 1 | 7 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 5/5 | 0/1 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 0% | 200% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
Tennis Scores in Shanghai Challenger
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Arthur GeaGea (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Petr Bar BiryukovBar Biryukov – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Marat SharipovSharipov (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Ilia SimakinSimakin – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (6-4 6-77 7-5) – See score progression
- Daniel EvansEvans – Linang XiaoXiao (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Filip PeliwoPeliwo – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (6-4 ret.) – See score progression
- Kasidit SamrejSamrej – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-6 7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Yaojie ZengZeng (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Renta TokudaTokuda – Kokoro IsomuraIsomura (6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Tsung-Hao HuangHuang – Yan BaiBai (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Yi ZhouZhou – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (2-6 7-65 2-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Jie CuiCui (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Omar JasikaJasika – Rigele TeTe (4-6 6-2 2-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Fajing SunSun – James McCabeMcCabe (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel EvansEvans – Linang XiaoXiao (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Filip PeliwoPeliwo – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (6-4 ret.) – See score progression
- Petr Bar BiryukovBar Biryukov – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Ilia SimakinSimakin – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (6-4 6-7(7) 7-5) – See score progression
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Arthur GeaGea (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Marat SharipovSharipov (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel EvansEvans – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fajing SunSun – Omar JasikaJasika (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tsung-Hao HuangHuang – Bernard TomicTomic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kasidit SamrejSamrej – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – (0-0) – H2H and prediction