Daniel Evans and Filip Peliwo will face off in the 2nd round of the Shanghai Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 5:30 pm on COURT 4. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Evans who should win in 2 sets.
Daniel Evans -> 1.123
Filip Peliwo -> 5.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Daniel Evans vs. Filip Peliwo
There is no head to head record between Daniel Evans and Filip Peliwo since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Daniel Evans
20 - 23win/loss
183
21
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22-25 | 8-10 | 6-7 | 1-3 | 7-5 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 18-26 | 8-11 | 3-8 | 4-3 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-27 | 11-15 | 5-7 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-27 | 19-13 | 4-7 | 6-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-24 | 12-11 | 6-6 | 3-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 136, Evans got to the 2nd round after defeating Linang Xiao 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Daniel had a good straight sets win against Xiao (6-4 6-4). During the match, Evans scored 70 points vs Xiao’s 65. The Brit was pretty aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, Evans blasted 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Daniel Evans lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Evans put 55% of his first serves in, winning 73% (29/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (15/33) on the 2nd serve. Evans broke Xiao 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Evans has good match record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (278-219). 6-8 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Evans has a composed 137-103 record in the last years on hard.
Daniel has a composed 20-23 win-loss record in 2025, 6-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Shanghai Challenger
The Brit has never competed in this tournament before.
Filip Peliwo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 52-32 | 47-28 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 32-29 | 26-20 | 1-2 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2023 | 40-37 | 35-25 | 4-8 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 51-31 | 40-21 | 6-6 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 31-20 | 14-10 | 9-8 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 535, the Canadian got to the 2nd round after beating Luca Castelnuovo 7-6(3) 6-3, James Watt 6-2 3-6 6-3 and Luca Van Assche 6-4 ret..
In the 1st round against Van Assche, the Canadian had a free pass after Van Assche retired on a 6-4 . scoreline.
Filip’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Luan and M15 Hillcrest.
Filip has a compiled 42-23 win-loss record in 2025, 37-19 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Evans | Peliwo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 58 |
| Pts | 70-65 | 202-169 |
| Total Points | 135 | 371 |
| Winners | 29 | 98 |
| %Winners | 41% | 49% |
Evans played 1 match while Peliwo competed in 3 matches. Peliwo started his run from the qualifications while Evans had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Filip Peliwo dropped 1 set while Daniel Evans hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Evans has played 5 set(s) less than Peliwo (2 vs 7). Therefore, Evans played 38 games less than Peliwo. Evans scored 29 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, The Canadian managed to score 98 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Evans | Peliwo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 2.3 |
| 1st in | 40/73 | 132/187 |
| %1st in | 55% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 29/40 | 98/132 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 15/33 | 24/55 |
| %2nd pts | 45% | 44% |
Evans fired 6 aces . Peliwo managed to score 7 aces (2.3 per match). Evans won 73% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Peliwo won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Evans | Peliwo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 9 |
| Converted | 4/11 | 9/18 |
| % Converted | 36% | 50% |
| Conceded | 6 | 13 |
| Saved | 4 | 8 |
| % Saved | 67% | 62% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 5 |
Evans broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Daniel lost his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Peliwo broke his opponents 9 times with a 50% conversion rate. Filip conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded.
| Evans | |||
| R1 Xiao | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 70-65 | 70-65 | |
| Total points | 135 | 135 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 40/73 | 40/73 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 29/40 | 29/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/33 | 15/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Peliwo | |||||
| Q1 Castelnuovo | Q3 Watt | R1 Van | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-3 | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | 6-4 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 26 | 10 | 58 | |
| pts | 72-58 | 87-73 | 43-38 | 202-169 | |
| Total points | 130 | 160 | 81 | 371 | |
| Winners | 40 | 43 | 15 | 98 | |
| %Winners | 56% | 49% | 35% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 51/68 | 59/79 | 22/40 | 132/187 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 75% | 55% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 40/51 | 43/59 | 15/22 | 98/132 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 73% | 68% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 9/20 | 6/18 | 24/55 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 45% | 33% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 3 | 9 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 4/7 | 3/7 | 9/18 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 57% | 43% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 5 | 6 | 13 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 3/5 | 4/6 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 60% | 67% | 177% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | |
Tennis Scores in Shanghai Challenger
- Filip PeliwoPeliwo – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (6-4 ret.) – See score progression
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Petr Bar BiryukovBar Biryukov – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Marat SharipovSharipov (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Ilia SimakinSimakin – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (6-4 6-77 7-5) – See score progression
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Arthur GeaGea (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel EvansEvans – Linang XiaoXiao (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Tsung-Hao HuangHuang – Yan BaiBai (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Kasidit SamrejSamrej – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-6 7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Yaojie ZengZeng (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Renta TokudaTokuda – Kokoro IsomuraIsomura (6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Yi ZhouZhou – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (2-6 7-65 2-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Fajing SunSun – James McCabeMcCabe (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Jie CuiCui (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Omar JasikaJasika – Rigele TeTe (4-6 6-2 2-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Daniel EvansEvans – Linang XiaoXiao (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Filip PeliwoPeliwo – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (6-4 ret.) – See score progression
- Petr Bar BiryukovBar Biryukov – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Ilia SimakinSimakin – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (6-4 6-7(7) 7-5) – See score progression
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Arthur GeaGea (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Marat SharipovSharipov (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel EvansEvans – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fajing SunSun – Omar JasikaJasika (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tsung-Hao HuangHuang – Bernard TomicTomic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kasidit SamrejSamrej – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – (0-0) – H2H and prediction