Filip Cristian Jianu and Sumit Nagal will square off in the 2nd round of the Tulln Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 4:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sumit Nagal who should win in 2 sets.
Sumit Nagal -> 1.34
Filip Cristian Jianu -> 3.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Filip Cristian Jianu vs. Sumit Nagal
There is no head to head record between Filip Cristian Jianu and Sumit Nagal since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Filip Cristian Jianu
24 - 32win/loss
289
210
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 39-39 | 2-5 | 37-30 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 70-34 | 0-0 | 70-33 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-35 | 2-2 | 44-29 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-38 | 3-9 | 22-20 | 7-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 50-39 | 7-5 | 41-28 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 267, Filip got to the 2nd round after defeating Alex Barrena 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, Cristian Jianu had a good straight sets win against Barrena (6-4 6-2). During the match, Cristian Jianu scored 63 points vs Barrena’s 50. The Romanian was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, Cristian Jianu fired 5 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults. Filip Cristian Jianu lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Cristian Jianu put 74% of his first serves in, winning 64% (29/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (7/16) on the 2nd serve. Filip broke Barrena 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Cristian Jianu has a winning match record in the last 9 years having won 58% of his matches (308-227). 22-23 on clay in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Cristian Jianu has a composed263-169 win-loss record in the last 9 years on clay.
The Romanian has an aggregate 24-32 win-loss record in 2025, 22-23 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tulln Challenger
Sumit Nagal
22 - 23win/loss
273
68
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 34-27 | 2-3 | 30-23 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 32-29 | 15-13 | 16-11 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 293, the Indian got to the 2nd round after beating Mili Poljicak 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, Nagal had a good straight sets win against Poljicak (6-4 6-2). During the match Nagal scored 62 points vs Poljicak’s 48. Sumit was pretty aggressive to blast 33 winners.
About the serving games, Nagal couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Sumit Nagal conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Nagal put 75% of his first serves in, winning 80% (33/41) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (7/14) on the 2nd serve. The Indian broke Poljicak 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Sumit’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Trieste Challenger and the Tampere Challenger.
The Indian has a composed 22-23 win-loss record in 2025, 20-19 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tulln Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the final in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cristian Jianu | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 |
| Pts | 63-50 | 62-48 |
| Total Points | 113 | 110 |
| Winners | 29 | 33 |
| %Winners | 46% | 53% |
Both Cristian Jianu and Nagal played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Cristian Jianu and Nagal have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (18). Cristian Jianu scored 29 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Sumit fired 33 winners (53%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cristian Jianu | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 0 |
| 1st in | 45/61 | 41/55 |
| %1st in | 74% | 75% |
| 1st pts | 29/45 | 33/41 |
| %1st pts | 64% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 7/16 | 7/14 |
| %2nd pts | 44% | 50% |
Cristian Jianu bagged 5 aces . Nagal didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Cristian Jianu won 64% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Nagal won 80% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cristian Jianu | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/9 | 3/7 |
| % Converted | 56% | 43% |
| Conceded | 9 | 2 |
| Saved | 7 | 2 |
| % Saved | 78% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Cristian Jianu broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Filip conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. Nagal broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Nagal was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Cristian Jianu | |||
| R1 Barrena | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 63-50 | 63-50 | |
| Total points | 113 | 113 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 45/61 | 45/61 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 29/45 | 29/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/16 | 7/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Nagal | |||
| R1 Poljicak | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 62-48 | 62-48 | |
| Total points | 110 | 110 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 53% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 41/55 | 41/55 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 33/41 | 33/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/14 | 7/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores in Tulln Challenger
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Jozef KovalikKovalik (6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – David PoljakPoljak (7-66 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Maxim MrvaMrva (6-2 7-65) – See score progression
- Marko TopoTopo – Dominic StrickerStricker (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Luka MikrutMikrut – Zdenek KolarKolar (5-7 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Joel SchwaerzlerSchwaerzler – Tiago PereiraPereira (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna – Mathys ErhardErhard (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko – Lukas NeumayerNeumayer (1-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (7-63 6-1) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Ivan GakhovGakhov (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Sandro KoppKopp – Corentin DenollyDenolly (2-6 7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Alex BarrenaBarrena (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Diego DeduraDedura – Jelle SelsSels (4-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Mili PoljicakPoljicak (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Jozef KovalikKovalik (6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Joel SchwaerzlerSchwaerzler – Tiago PereiraPereira (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Luka MikrutMikrut – Zdenek KolarKolar (5-7 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Maxim MrvaMrva (6-2 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna – Mathys ErhardErhard (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – David PoljakPoljak (7-6(6) 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko – Lukas NeumayerNeumayer (1-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Marko TopoTopo – Dominic StrickerStricker (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (7-6(3) 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kai WehneltWehnelt – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sandro KoppKopp – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko (0-0) – H2H and prediction