Rudolf Molleker and David Poljak will fight against each other in the 1st round of the Tulln Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 3:00 pm on COURT 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Rudolf Molleker who should win in 2 sets.
Rudolf Molleker -> 1.133
David Poljak -> 5.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Rudolf Molleker vs. David Poljak
There is no head to head record between Rudolf Molleker and David Poljak since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Rudolf Molleker
27 - 21win/loss
424
146
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37-28 | 5-3 | 26-17 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 28-34 | 4-8 | 15-18 | 7-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-35 | 2-3 | 42-25 | 6-5 | 0-1 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 47-28 | 2-1 | 45-24 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 8-23 | 0-1 | 6-16 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 386, the German reached the 1st round after defeating Bastian Berenz 6-2 6-1 and Sebastian Gima 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Rudolf had a good straight sets win against Gima (6-4 6-2). During the match, Molleker scored 60 points vs Gima’s 42. The German was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Molleker scored 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Rudolf Molleker was pretty efficient on serve to win 85% (29/34) of his 1st serve and 62% (8/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Molleker broke Gima 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Molleker started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this event to win 62% of the points he played.
Molleker has a winning win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 53% of his matches (258-227). 22-14 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Molleker has an aggregate192-138 record in the last 9 years on clay.
The German’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Bol.
Molleker has a compiled 27-21 win-loss record in 2025, 22-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tulln Challenger
David Poljak
24 - 14win/loss
896
370
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-19 | 6-6 | 4-4 | 18-8 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2024 | 22-22 | 7-4 | 5-5 | 8-11 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2023 | 10-15 | 7-11 | 3-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-30 | 6-4 | 8-10 | 25-15 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 38-28 | 15-12 | 12-12 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
Ranked no. 896, David reached the 1st round after beating Gabi Adrian Boitan w/o and Dan Martin 7-6(1) 4-6 7-5.
In the qualifications, Poljak defeated Martin (7-61 4-6 7-5). During the match Poljak scored 121 points vs Martin’s 105. David was quite aggressive to blast 51 winners.
About the serving games, Poljak made 15 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. David Poljak lost the serve 3 times and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Poljak put 55% of his first serves in, winning 81% (51/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (26/52) on the 2nd serve. The Czech broke Martin 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
The Czech has a compiled 24-14 win-loss record in 2025, 3-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tulln Challenger
David has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Molleker | Poljak |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 33 | 35 |
| Pts | 118-73 | 121-105 |
| Total Points | 191 | 226 |
| Winners | 49 | 51 |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% |
Molleker played 2 matches while Poljak competed in 1 match. At the moment, David Poljak surrendered 1 set while Rudolf Molleker hasn’t dropped a set so far. Molleker has played 1 set more than Poljak (4 vs 3). However, it’s interesting to notice that Molleker played 2 games less than Poljak. Rudolf scored 49 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, David recorded 51 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Molleker | Poljak |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 15 |
| Avg per match | 2.5 | 15 |
| 1st in | 60/88 | 63/115 |
| %1st in | 68% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 49/60 | 51/63 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 16/28 | 26/52 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 50% |
Molleker fired 5 aces (2.5 per match). Poljak scored 15 aces . Molleker won 82% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Poljak won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Molleker | Poljak |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 3 |
| Converted | 9/14 | 3/9 |
| % Converted | 64% | 33% |
| Conceded | 4 | 13 |
| Saved | 3 | 10 |
| % Saved | 75% | 77% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
The German broke his opponents 9 times with a 64% conversion rate. Molleker dropped his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. David broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. David conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 77% of the break points that he conceded.
| Molleker | ||||
| Q1 Berenz | Q3 Gima | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 18 | 33 | |
| pts | 58-31 | 60-42 | 118-73 | |
| Total points | 89 | 102 | 191 | |
| Winners | 20 | 29 | 49 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 48% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 26/41 | 34/47 | 60/88 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 72% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 20/26 | 29/34 | 49/60 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 85% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/15 | 8/13 | 16/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 62% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 6 | 3 | 9 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 3/4 | 9/14 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 75% | 64% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 1/1 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 100% | 84% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Poljak | ||||
| Q1 Adrian | Q3 Martin | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | w/o | 7-61 4-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | – | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | – | 35 | 35 | |
| pts | – | 121-105 | 121-105 | |
| Total points | – | 226 | 226 | |
| Winners | – | 51 | 51 | |
| %Winners | – | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | – | 15 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | – | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | – | 63/115 | 63/115 | |
| % 1st in | – | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | – | 51/63 | 51/63 | |
| % 1st pts | – | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | – | 26/52 | 26/52 | |
| % 2nd pts | – | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | – | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | – | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | – | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | – | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | – | 10/13 | 10 | |
| Saved % | – | 77% | 39% | |
| Times Broken | – | 3 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Tulln Challenger
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Ivan GakhovGakhov (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Alex BarrenaBarrena (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Diego DeduraDedura – Jelle SelsSels (4-6 6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sumit NagalNagal – Mili PoljicakPoljicak (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sandro KoppKopp – Corentin DenollyDenolly (2-6 7-5 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Jozef KovalikKovalik (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kai WehneltWehnelt – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Mathys ErhardErhard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – David PoljakPoljak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini (0-0) – H2H and prediction