Andrey Rublev and Chak Lam Coleman Wong will clash against each other in the 3rd round of the U.S. Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 1:00 pm on Grandstand. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Andrey Rublev who should win in 3 sets.
Andrey Rublev -> 1.179
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 4.9
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Andrey Rublev vs. Chak Lam Coleman Wong
There is no head to head record between Andrey Rublev and Chak Lam Coleman Wong since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Andrey Rublev
32 - 19win/loss
16
5
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 34-25 | 16-13 | 8-6 | 6-4 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 43-26 | 26-11 | 11-6 | 6-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 56-26 | 23-12 | 19-5 | 6-7 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 51-20 | 19-7 | 14-6 | 18-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 25-10 | 9-5 | 12-6 | 7-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 15, Rublev reached the 3rd round after defeating Dino Prizmic 6-4 6-4 6-4 and Tristan Boyer 6-3 6-3 5-7 7-6(4).
In the 2nd round, The Russian had a good straight sets win against Boyer (6-3 6-3 5-7 7-64). During the match, Rublev scored 139 points vs Boyer’s 126. Andrey was very aggressive to blast 62 winners.
Regarding the service games, Rublev submerged his opponent with 21 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Andrey Rublev lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Rublev put 58% of his first serves in, winning 82% (62/76) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (27/56) on the 2nd serve. Andrey broke Boyer 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Rublev has surrendered 1 set in this competition to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Rublev has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (436-241). 15-9 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Rublev has a composed 188-97 record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the current year was winning the title in Doha where he defeated Jack Draper in the final 7-5 5-7 6-1.
The Russian has an overall 31-19 win-loss record in 2025, 15-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
24 - 23win/loss
143
128
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 32-30 | 20-18 | 2-6 | 4-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-36 | 39-26 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 173, the reached the 3rd round after beating Chris Rodesch 6-4 6-2, Matteo Gigante 4-6 6-3 7-5, Billy Harris 6-3 6-4, Aleksandar Kovacevic 6-4 7-5 7-6(4)
and Adam Walton 7-6(5) 6-2 4-6 6-4.In the 2nd round, Chak had a good straight sets win against Walton (7-65 6-2 4-6 6-4). During the match Lam Coleman Wong scored 144 points vs Walton’s 121. Chak was pretty aggressive to blast 53 winners.
Talking about serving, Lam Coleman Wong overwhelmed his opponent with 21 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Chak Lam Coleman Wong was very efficient on serve to win 74% (53/72) of his 1st serve and 53% (31/58) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 5 times. Chak broke Walton 7 times after converting 47% of his break points (7/15).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Lam Coleman Wong started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
The has an overall 24-22 win-loss record in 2025, 15-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Rublev | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 5 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 14 |
| Tot Games | 73 | 144 |
| Pts | 231-199 | 477-404 |
| Total Points | 430 | 881 |
| Winners | 98 | 195 |
| %Winners | 42% | 41% |
Rublev played 2 matches while Lam Coleman Wong competed in 5 matches. Lam Coleman Wong started his run from the qualifications while Rublev had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Andrey Rublev lost 1 set, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong surrendered 2 sets. Rublev has played 7 set(s) less than Lam Coleman Wong (7 vs 14). Therefore, Rublev played 71 games less than Lam Coleman Wong. Andrey scored 98 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Lam Coleman Wong scored 195 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Rublev | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 30 | 62 |
| Avg per match | 15 | 12.4 |
| 1st in | 117/219 | 252/441 |
| %1st in | 53% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 98/117 | 195/252 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 55/102 | 102/189 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 54% |
Rublev scored 30 aces (15 per match). Lam Coleman Wong managed to score 62 aces (12.4 per match). Rublev won 84% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Lam Coleman Wong won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Rublev | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 22 |
| Converted | 8/14 | 22/47 |
| % Converted | 57% | 47% |
| Conceded | 10 | 35 |
| Saved | 7 | 23 |
| % Saved | 70% | 66% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 12 |
Rublev broke his opponents 8 times with a 57% conversion rate. Andrey conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded. Chak broke his opponents 22 times with a 47% conversion rate. Chak conceded his serve 12 times and he saved 66% of the break points that he conceded.
| Rublev | ||||
| R1 Prizmic | R2 Boyer | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 6-4 | 6-3 6-3 5-7 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 43 | 73 | |
| pts | 92-73 | 139-126 | 231-199 | |
| Total points | 165 | 265 | 430 | |
| Winners | 36 | 62 | 98 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 45% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 9 | 21 | 30 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 5 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 41/87 | 76/132 | 117/219 | |
| % 1st in | 47% | 58% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 36/41 | 62/76 | 98/117 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 82% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 28/46 | 27/56 | 55/102 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 48% | 54% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 8 | |
| Converted | 3/3 | 5/11 | 8/14 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 45% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 7 | 10 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 4/7 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 57% | 79% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||||||
| Q1 Rodesch | Q2 Gigante | Q3 Harris | R1 Kovacevic | R2 Walton | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | 6-3 6-4 | 6-4 7-5 7-64 | 7-65 6-2 4-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 14 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 31 | 19 | 35 | 41 | 144 | |
| pts | 63-43 | 102-97 | 60-48 | 108-95 | 144-121 | 477-404 | |
| Total points | 106 | 199 | 108 | 203 | 265 | 881 | |
| Winners | 24 | 46 | 31 | 41 | 53 | 195 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 45% | 52% | 38% | 37% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||||
| Aces | 5 | 7 | 7 | 22 | 21 | 62 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 29/45 | 59/108 | 40/55 | 52/103 | 72/130 | 252/441 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 55% | 73% | 50% | 55% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 24/29 | 46/59 | 31/40 | 41/52 | 53/72 | 195/252 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 78% | 78% | 79% | 74% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/16 | 17/49 | 8/15 | 33/51 | 31/58 | 102/189 | |
| % 2nd pts | 81% | 35% | 53% | 65% | 53% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 22 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 5/12 | 3/7 | 4/9 | 7/15 | 22/47 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 42% | 43% | 44% | 47% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 10 | 3 | 6 | 16 | 35 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 6/10 | 2/3 | 4/6 | 11/16 | 23 | |
| Saved % | – | 60% | 67% | 67% | 69% | 132% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 12 | |
Tennis Scores – U.S. Open
- Taylor FritzFritz – Jerome KymKym (7-6(3) 6-7(9) 6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Raphael CollignonCollignon (6-4 6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Carlos AlcarazAlcaraz – Luciano DarderiDarderi (6-2 6-4 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas MachacMachac – Ugo BlanchetBlanchet (7-5 6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Frances TiafoeTiafoe (6-4 6-3 7-67) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Novak DjokovicDjokovic – Cameron NorrieNorrie (6-4 6-74 6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Benjamin BonziBonzi (4-6 6-3 6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Denis ShapovalovShapovalov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander BublikBublik – Tommy PaulPaul (1-5) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Flavio CobolliCobolli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Zizou BergsBergs (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ZverevZverev – Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime (6-2) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Alex De MinaurDe Minaur (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Novak DjokovicDjokovic – Jan-Lennard StruffStruff (7-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia (0-3) – H2H and prediction