Jurij Rodionov and Daniel Masur will face off in the quarter of the Manacor Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 4:00 pm on PISTA 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jurij Rodionov who should win in 2 sets.
Jurij Rodionov -> 1.29
Daniel Masur -> 3.34
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jurij Rodionov vs. Daniel Masur
There is no head to head record between Jurij Rodionov and Daniel Masur since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Jurij Rodionov
30 - 21win/loss
177
87
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 41-30 | 17-12 | 14-10 | 10-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 27-32 | 10-10 | 6-12 | 11-7 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-33 | 3-6 | 15-13 | 21-11 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 45-31 | 5-5 | 16-11 | 21-11 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 20-28 | 2-4 | 2-7 | 13-13 | 3-3 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 154, Jurij reached the quarter after beating Matteo Martineau 6-4 4-6 6-2 and Justin Engel 6-4 7-5.
In the 2nd round, Rodionov had a good straight sets win against Engel (6-4 7-5). During the match, Rodionov scored 83 points vs Engel’s 67. Rodionov was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Regarding the service games, Rodionov made 10 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Jurij Rodionov conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 4 break points. Furthermore, Rodionov put 65% of his first serves in, winning 84% (38/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (11/24) on the 2nd serve. The Austrian broke Engel twice after converting 22% of his break points (2/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jurij has conceded 1 set in this tournament to conquer 53% of the points he played.
Rodionov has winning match record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (302-234). 8-7 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Rodionov has a compiled 71-57 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the current season was conquering the title the Bonn Challenger where he overcame Timofey Skatov in the final 3-6 6-2 6-4.
Jurij has an aggregate 29-21 win-loss record in 2025, 8-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Manacor Challenger
Daniel Masur
13 - 20win/loss
492
176
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 23-27 | 9-6 | 8-11 | 6-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 47-26 | 1-2 | 11-10 | 22-11 | 1-2 | 12-1 |
| 2023 | 34-24 | 7-8 | 9-7 | 9-5 | 0-1 | 9-3 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 7-8 | 5-6 | 4-9 | 5-3 | 4-2 |
| 2021 | 28-26 | 4-4 | 1-7 | 15-12 | 3-2 | 5-1 |
Ranked no. 525, Masur reached the quarter after defeating Milos Karol 7-6(7) 6-3, Sergio Callejon Hernando 7-6(2) 6-2, Saba Purtseladze 6-4 6-4 and Alberto Barroso Campos 7-5 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Daniel had a good straight sets win against Barroso Campos (7-5 6-2). During the match Masur scored 66 points vs Barroso Campos’s 46. Daniel was extremely aggressive to blast 24 winners.
About the serving games, Masur made 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Daniel Masur was quite effective on serve to win 73% (24/33) of his 1st serve and 57% (12/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Daniel broke Barroso Campos 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The German started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this event to win 56% of the points he played.
Daniel’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Cervia.
The German has a compiled 13-19 win-loss record in 2025, 4-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Manacor Challenger
Daniel has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Rodionov | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 50 | 83 |
| Pts | 175-153 | 285-228 |
| Total Points | 328 | 513 |
| Winners | 72 | 119 |
| %Winners | 41% | 42% |
Rodionov played 2 matches while Masur competed in 4 matches. Masur started his run from the qualifications while Rodionov had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Jurij Rodionov surrendered 1 set while Daniel Masur hasn’t lost a set so far. Rodionov has played 3 set(s) less than Masur (5 vs 8). Therefore, Rodionov played 33 games less than Masur. Jurij scored 72 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Daniel recorded 119 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Rodionov | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 16 | 36 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 9 |
| 1st in | 97/159 | 164/252 |
| %1st in | 61% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 72/97 | 119/164 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 32/62 | 51/88 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 58% |
Rodionov managed to score 16 aces (8 per match). Masur struck 36 aces (9 per match). Rodionov won 74% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Masur won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Rodionov | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 16 |
| Converted | 7/19 | 16/32 |
| % Converted | 37% | 50% |
| Conceded | 14 | 20 |
| Saved | 11 | 13 |
| % Saved | 79% | 65% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 7 |
Jurij broke his opponents 7 times with a 37% conversion rate. Rodionov surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded. The German broke his opponents 16 times with a 50% conversion rate. Masur conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 65% of the break points that he conceded.
| Rodionov | ||||
| R1 Martineau | R2 Engel | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 22 | 50 | |
| pts | 92-86 | 83-67 | 175-153 | |
| Total points | 178 | 150 | 328 | |
| Winners | 34 | 38 | 72 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 46% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 10 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 52/90 | 45/69 | 97/159 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 65% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 34/52 | 38/45 | 72/97 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 84% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/38 | 11/24 | 32/62 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 46% | 52% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 2 | 7 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 2/9 | 7/19 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 22% | 37% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 4 | 14 | |
| Saved | 7/10 | 4/4 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 70% | 100% | 85% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| Masur | ||||||
| Q1 Karol | Q3 Callejon | R1 Purtseladze | R2 Barroso Campos | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-67 6-3 | 7-62 6-2 | 6-4 6-4 | 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 21 | 20 | 20 | 83 | |
| pts | 82-70 | 70-55 | 67-57 | 66-46 | 285-228 | |
| Total points | 152 | 125 | 124 | 112 | 513 | |
| Winners | 36 | 28 | 31 | 24 | 119 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 40% | 46% | 36% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 9 | 13 | 6 | 8 | 36 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 52/75 | 38/61 | 41/62 | 33/54 | 164/252 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 62% | 66% | 61% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 36/52 | 28/38 | 31/41 | 24/33 | 119/164 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 74% | 76% | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 14/23 | 12/21 | 12/21 | 51/88 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 61% | 57% | 57% | 58% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 16 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/6 | 3/7 | 5/9 | 16/32 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 67% | 43% | 56% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 20 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 4/6 | 3/4 | 0/2 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 67% | 75% | 0% | 109% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel MasurMasur – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Stuart ParkerParker (0-0) – H2H and prediction