Jakub Paul and Stuart Parker will face off in the 2nd round of the Manacor Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 3:00 pm on PISTA 4. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jakub Paul who should win in 3 sets.
Jakub Paul -> 1.52
Stuart Parker -> 2.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jakub Paul vs. Stuart Parker
There is no head to head record between Jakub Paul and Stuart Parker since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Jakub Paul
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 35-21 | 14-5 | 12-7 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 44-27 | 15-9 | 17-11 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-24 | 20-4 | 14-12 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2022 | 25-26 | 4-4 | 20-18 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 34-21 | 4-3 | 17-10 | 11-7 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 288 (career-high), Jakub reached the 2nd round after defeating Daniel Milavsky 6-4 7-6(3), Christian Langmo 6-2 7-5 and Benjamin Hassan 6-3 7-6(5).
In the 1st round, Jakub had a good straight sets win against Hassan (6-3 7-65). During the match, Paul scored 73 points vs Hassan’s 69. Jakub was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Paul was unable to score even 1 ace in the course of the match and he committed only 3 double faults. Jakub Paul lost the serve 4 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Paul put 65% of his first serves in, winning 65% (33/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (11/27) on the 2nd serve. Jakub broke Hassan 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Paul has a winning match record in the last 9 years having won 57% of his matches (237-178). 12-3 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Paul has an aggregate82-43 record in the last 9 years on hard.
Jakub’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Koblenz Challenger and the Zug Challenger.
Jakub has a composed 33-16 win-loss record in 2025, 12-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Manacor Challenger
The Swiss has never competed in this tournament before.
Stuart Parker
30 - 18win/loss
416
346
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37-24 | 26-14 | 0-0 | 10-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-21 | 29-13 | 0-2 | 10-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-21 | 18-12 | 3-3 | 0-2 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-26 | 23-12 | 0-0 | 10-8 | 7-5 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 44-16 | 40-12 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 445, Stuart reached the 2nd round after defeating Pavlos Tsitsipas 6-2 6-1, Adria Soriano Barrera 6-4 6-3 and John Echeverria 6-7(3) 6-0 6-0.
In the 1st round against Echeverria, Parker recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-73 6-0 6-0). During the match Parker scored 103 points vs Echeverria’s 74. Parker was pretty aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Parker managed to score 10 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Stuart Parker lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Parker put 53% of his first serves in, winning 69% (33/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (23/43) on the 2nd serve. Stuart broke Echeverria 8 times after converting 67% of his break points (8/12).
The Brit’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Hersonissos 1 Challenger and M15 Heraklion.
Parker has an aggregate 30-18 win-loss record in 2025, 25-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Paul | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 65 | 59 |
| Pts | 215-189 | 227-157 |
| Total Points | 404 | 384 |
| Winners | 97 | 76 |
| %Winners | 45% | 33% |
Both Paul and Parker played 3 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Stuart Parker lost 1 set while Jakub Paul hasn’t conceded a set so far. Paul has played 1 set(s) less than Parker (6 vs 7). However, it’s interesting to notice that Paul played 6 games more than Parker. Jakub scored 97 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Parker managed to score 76 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Paul | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 20 |
| Avg per match | 0.7 | 6.7 |
| 1st in | 139/216 | 99/181 |
| %1st in | 64% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 97/139 | 76/99 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 39/77 | 48/82 |
| %2nd pts | 51% | 59% |
Paul made 2 aces (0.7 per match). Parker struck 20 aces (6.7 per match). Paul won 70% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Parker won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Paul | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 13 | 16 |
| Converted | 13/28 | 16/22 |
| % Converted | 46% | 73% |
| Conceded | 19 | 5 |
| Saved | 12 | 3 |
| % Saved | 63% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 7 | 2 |
Jakub broke his opponents 13 times with a 46% conversion rate. The Swiss lost his serve 7 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. Stuart broke his opponents 16 times with a 73% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Paul | |||||
| Q1 Milavsky | Q3 Langmo | R1 Hassan | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-63 | 6-2 7-5 | 6-3 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 20 | 22 | 65 | |
| pts | 75-68 | 67-52 | 73-69 | 215-189 | |
| Total points | 143 | 119 | 142 | 404 | |
| Winners | 34 | 30 | 33 | 97 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 48/80 | 40/58 | 51/78 | 139/216 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 69% | 65% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 34/48 | 30/40 | 33/51 | 97/139 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 75% | 65% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/32 | 9/18 | 11/27 | 39/77 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 50% | 41% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 5 | 6 | 13 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 5/14 | 6/11 | 13/28 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 36% | 55% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 2 | 11 | 19 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 0/2 | 7/11 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 0% | 64% | 49% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | |
| Parker | |||||
| Q1 Tsitsipas | Q3 Soriano | R1 Echeverria | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | 6-4 6-3 | 6-73 6-0 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 19 | 25 | 59 | |
| pts | 57-32 | 67-51 | 103-74 | 227-157 | |
| Total points | 89 | 118 | 177 | 384 | |
| Winners | 19 | 24 | 33 | 76 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 36% | 32% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 7 | 3 | 10 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 7 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 24/42 | 27/48 | 48/91 | 99/181 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 56% | 53% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 19/24 | 24/27 | 33/48 | 76/99 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 89% | 69% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/18 | 13/21 | 23/43 | 48/82 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 62% | 53% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 8 | 16 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 3/4 | 8/12 | 16/22 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 75% | 67% | 73% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 60% | 20% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores in Manacor Challenger
- Daniel RinconRincon – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-4 3-6 7-61) – See score progression
- Alberto Barroso CamposBarroso Campos – Norbert GombosGombos (7-5 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Eliakim CoulibalyCoulibaly – Marek GengelGengel (2-6 7-64 6-0) – See score progression
- Daniel MasurMasur – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Edas ButvilasButvilas – Michael GeertsGeerts (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Stuart ParkerParker – John EcheverriaEcheverria (6-73 6-0 6-0) – See score progression
- Hamish StewartStewart – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Martin LandaluceLandaluce (6-1 7-65) – See score progression
- Adria Soriano BarreraSoriano Barrera – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (7-63 6-76 3-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Jakub PaulPaul – Benjamin HassanHassan (6-3 7-65) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Matteo MartineauMartineau (6-4 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Miguel TobonTobon – Calvin HemeryHemery (6-3 4-1 ret.) – See score progression
- David Pichler/Jurij RodionovPichler/Jurij Rodionov – Patrick Kaukovalta/Otto VirtanenKaukovalta/Otto Virtanen (6-2 7-65) – See score progression
- Jay Dylan Hara FriendDylan Hara Friend – Federico CinaCina (6-0 6-0) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – George LoffhagenLoffhagen (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Sascha Gueymard WayenburgGueymard Wayenburg – Ryan PenistonPeniston (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Justin EngelEngel – Ivan IvanovIvanov (7-66 7-5) – See score progression
- Daniel RinconRincon – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-4 3-6 7-6(1)) – See score progression
- Eliakim CoulibalyCoulibaly – Marek GengelGengel (2-6 7-6(4) 6-0) – See score progression
- Adria Soriano BarreraSoriano Barrera – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (7-6(3) 6-7(6) 3-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Stuart ParkerParker – John EcheverriaEcheverria (6-7(3) 6-0 6-0) – See score progression
- Daniel MasurMasur – Saba PurtseladzePurtseladze (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Alberto Barroso CamposBarroso Campos – Norbert GombosGombos (7-5 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Martin LandaluceLandaluce (6-1 7-6(5)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel MasurMasur – Alberto Barroso CamposBarroso Campos (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stuart ParkerParker – Jakub PaulPaul (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hamish StewartStewart – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Adria Soriano BarreraSoriano Barrera (0-0) – H2H and prediction