Adam Walton and Chak Lam Coleman Wong will face off in the 2nd round of the U.S. Open for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on Court 10. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Adam Walton who should win in 5 sets.
Adam Walton -> 1.71
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 2.14
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Adam Walton vs. Chak Lam Coleman Wong
This will be the 3rd time that Adam Walton and Chak Lam Coleman Wong play each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Walton and Lam Coleman Wong (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on hard.
The last time that they fought against each other, Walton won 7-6(6) 4-6 6-4 in the 3rd round in Miami back in March 2025.
Highlights Adam Walton vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong – Miami 24-March-2025
Adam Walton
34 - 25win/loss
78
74
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 36-34 | 32-23 | 2-2 | 1-4 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 54-37 | 46-27 | 0-2 | 4-3 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 56-30 | 53-26 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-12 | 41-10 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 85, Adam got to the 2nd round after defeating Ugo Humbert 6-4 7-6(4) 5-7 6-1.
In the 1st round, Adam had a good straight sets win against Humbert (6-4 7-64 5-7 6-1). During the match, Walton scored 136 points vs Humbert’s 114. The Australian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 61 winners.
Regarding the service games, Walton fired 15 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Adam Walton was quite effective on serve to win 88% (61/69) of his 1st serve and 61% (30/49) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Adam broke Humbert 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Walton has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 63% of his matches (196-113). 31-18 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Walton has an overall180-87 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
His best result of the current season was conquering the title the Brisbane 2 Challenger where he overcame Jason Murray Kubler in the final 7-6(6) 7-6(4).
The Australian has a composed 34-25 win-loss record in 2025, 31-18 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
23 - 22win/loss
143
128
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 32-30 | 20-18 | 2-6 | 4-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-36 | 39-26 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 173, Lam Coleman Wong reached the 2nd round after beating Chris Rodesch 6-4 6-2, Matteo Gigante 4-6 6-3 7-5, Billy Harris 6-3 6-4 and Aleksandar Kovacevic 6-4 7-5 7-6(4).
In the 1st round, Chak had a good straight sets win against Kovacevic (6-4 7-5 7-64). During the match Lam Coleman Wong scored 108 points vs Kovacevic’s 95. Lam Coleman Wong was exceptionally aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about serving, Lam Coleman Wong overpowered his opponent with 22 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Chak Lam Coleman Wong was pretty efficient on serve to win 79% (41/52) of his 1st serve and 65% (33/51) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The broke Kovacevic 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Chak has a compiled 23-22 win-loss record in 2025, 14-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Walton | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 42 | 103 |
| Pts | 136-114 | 333-283 |
| Total Points | 250 | 616 |
| Winners | 61 | 142 |
| %Winners | 45% | 43% |
Walton played 1 match while Lam Coleman Wong competed in 4 matches. Lam Coleman Wong started his run from the qualifications while Walton had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Adam Walton dropped 1 set, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong conceded 1 set. Walton has played 6 set(s) less than Lam Coleman Wong (4 vs 10). Therefore, Walton played 61 games less than Lam Coleman Wong. Adam scored 61 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The managed to score 142 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Walton | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 41 |
| Avg per match | 15 | 10.3 |
| 1st in | 69/118 | 180/311 |
| %1st in | 58% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 61/69 | 142/180 |
| %1st pts | 88% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 30/49 | 71/131 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 54% |
Walton scored 15 aces . Lam Coleman Wong made 41 aces (10.3 per match). Walton won 88% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Lam Coleman Wong won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Walton | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 15 |
| Converted | 3/6 | 15/32 |
| % Converted | 50% | 47% |
| Conceded | 3 | 19 |
| Saved | 2 | 12 |
| % Saved | 67% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 7 |
Adam broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Australian dropped his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The broke his opponents 15 times with a 47% conversion rate. Lam Coleman Wong conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
| Walton | |||
| R1 Humbert | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-64 5-7 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 4 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 42 | 42 | |
| pts | 136-114 | 136-114 | |
| Total points | 250 | 250 | |
| Winners | 61 | 61 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 15 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 69/118 | 69/118 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 61/69 | 61/69 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 30/49 | 30/49 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Lam Coleman Wong | ||||||
| Q1 Rodesch | Q2 Gigante | Q3 Harris | R1 Kovacevic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | 6-3 6-4 | 6-4 7-5 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 31 | 19 | 35 | 103 | |
| pts | 63-43 | 102-97 | 60-48 | 108-95 | 333-283 | |
| Total points | 106 | 199 | 108 | 203 | 616 | |
| Winners | 24 | 46 | 31 | 41 | 142 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 45% | 52% | 38% | 43% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 5 | 7 | 7 | 22 | 41 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 29/45 | 59/108 | 40/55 | 52/103 | 180/311 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 55% | 73% | 50% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 24/29 | 46/59 | 31/40 | 41/52 | 142/180 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 78% | 78% | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/16 | 17/49 | 8/15 | 33/51 | 71/131 | |
| % 2nd pts | 81% | 35% | 53% | 65% | 54% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 15 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 5/12 | 3/7 | 4/9 | 15/32 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 42% | 43% | 44% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 10 | 3 | 6 | 19 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 6/10 | 2/3 | 4/6 | 12 | |
| Saved % | – | 60% | 67% | 67% | 194% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 7 | |
Tennis Scores – U.S. Open
- Tomas MachacMachac – Joao FonsecaFonseca (7-6(4) 6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (3-6 6-0 6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Zizou BergsBergs – Jack DraperDraper (w/o) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Novak DjokovicDjokovic – Zachary SvajdaSvajda (6-7(5) 6-3 6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Novak DjokovicDjokovic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (4-6) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ZverevZverev – Jacob FearnleyFearnley (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander BublikBublik – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Karen KhachanovKhachanov – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (4-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Francisco ComesanaComesana (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Marcos GironGiron (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Tommy PaulPaul (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Flavio CobolliCobolli (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Andrey RublevRublev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Denis ShapovalovShapovalov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – David GoffinGoffin (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (2-0) – H2H and prediction