Gonzalo Bueno and Henri Squire will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Como Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 10:00 am on COURT 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Gonzalo Bueno who should win in 3 sets.
Gonzalo Bueno -> 1.63
Henri Squire -> 2.17
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Gonzalo Bueno vs. Henri Squire
There is no head to head record between Gonzalo Bueno and Henri Squire since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Gonzalo Bueno
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 43-31 | 0-0 | 43-31 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 35-31 | 0-2 | 35-28 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-28 | 2-1 | 38-27 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 20-14 | 0-0 | 20-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 205 (career-high), Gonzalo reached the 2nd round after defeating Facundo Diaz Acosta 3-6 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round against Diaz Acosta, Gonzalo recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-3 6-4).During the match, Bueno scored less points (2) than Diaz Acosta. In fact, the world no. 205 won 87 points vs Diaz Acosta’s. That means that Bueno was more focused during the important points. Gonzalo was exceptionally aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Regarding the service games, Bueno scored just 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Gonzalo Bueno lost the serve 4 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Bueno put 77% of his first serves in, winning 58% (36/62) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (9/19) on the 2nd serve. Bueno broke Diaz Acosta 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
Bueno has a winning match record in the last 6 years having won 56% of his matches (130-101). 31-21 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Bueno has an overall128-97 match record in the last 6 years on clay.
His best result of the year was conquering the title the Liberec Challenger where he beat Genaro Alberto Olivieri in the final 6-2 2-0 ret..
Gonzalo has a composed 31-21 win-loss record in 2025, 31-21 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Como Challenger
Henri Squire
25 - 25win/loss
274
169
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 41-32 | 1-3 | 31-21 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-31 | 1-3 | 21-13 | 19-12 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-38 | 7-4 | 30-25 | 15-6 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 38-31 | 1-2 | 8-11 | 27-16 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-12 | 0-0 | 21-8 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 5-3 |
Ranked no. 391, Squire got to the 2nd round after defeating Carlo Alberto Fossati 6-0 6-3, Rudolf Molleker 7-6(3) 6-7(4) 6-2 and Tommaso Compagnucci 7-6(5) 6-2.
In the 1st round, The German had a good straight sets win against Compagnucci (7-65 6-2). During the match Squire scored 70 points vs Compagnucci’s 65. Squire was extremely aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Squire fired 2 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Henri Squire lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Squire put 69% of his first serves in, winning 68% (32/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 33% (7/21) on the 2nd serve. Squire broke Compagnucci 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Henri’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Kramsach,M25 Koksijde and the Augsburg Challenger.
The German has a compiled 25-25 win-loss record in 2025, 18-17 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Como Challenger
Squire has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Bueno | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 70 |
| Pts | 87-89 | 241-204 |
| Total Points | 176 | 445 |
| Winners | 36 | 109 |
| %Winners | 41% | 45% |
Bueno played 1 match while Squire competed in 3 matches. Squire started his run from the qualifications while Bueno had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Gonzalo Bueno conceded 1 set, while Henri Squire surrendered 1 set. Bueno has played 4 set(s) less than Squire (3 vs 7). Therefore, Bueno played 42 games less than Squire. Bueno scored 36 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Squire blasted 109 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Bueno | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 27 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 9 |
| 1st in | 62/81 | 152/211 |
| %1st in | 77% | 72% |
| 1st pts | 36/62 | 109/152 |
| %1st pts | 58% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | 26/59 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 44% |
Bueno bagged 1 ace . Squire also managed to score 27 aces (9 per match). Bueno won 58% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Squire won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Bueno | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 15 |
| Converted | 5/13 | 15/28 |
| % Converted | 38% | 54% |
| Conceded | 8 | 11 |
| Saved | 4 | 4 |
| % Saved | 50% | 36% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 7 |
The Peruvian broke his opponent 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Peruvian lost his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The German broke his opponents 15 times with a 54% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 36% of the break points that he conceded.
| Bueno | |||
| R1 Diaz | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 87-89 | 87-89 | |
| Total points | 176 | 176 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 62/81 | 62/81 | |
| % 1st in | 77% | 77% | |
| 1st pts | 36/62 | 36/62 | |
| % 1st pts | 58% | 58% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | 9/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 4/8 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Squire | |||||
| Q1 Alberto Fossati | Q3 Molleker | R1 Compagnucci | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-3 | 7-63 6-74 6-2 | 7-65 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 34 | 21 | 70 | |
| pts | 56-31 | 115-108 | 70-65 | 241-204 | |
| Total points | 87 | 223 | 135 | 445 | |
| Winners | 29 | 48 | 32 | 109 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 42% | 46% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 21 | 2 | 27 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 37/40 | 68/103 | 47/68 | 152/211 | |
| % 1st in | 93% | 66% | 69% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 29/37 | 48/68 | 32/47 | 109/152 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 71% | 68% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 3/3 | 16/35 | 7/21 | 26/59 | |
| % 2nd pts | 100% | 46% | 33% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 5 | 15 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 6/11 | 5/8 | 15/28 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 55% | 63% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 5 | 6 | 11 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 1/5 | 3/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | – | 20% | 50% | 70% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
Tennis Scores in Como Challenger
- Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro – Andrej MartinMartin (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Juan Bautista TorresBautista Torres – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (1-6 7-5 3-0 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko (7-64 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini – Lorenzo CarboniCarboni (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (1-0) – H2H and prediction