Rudolf Molleker and Henri Squire will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Como Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Henri Squire who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Henri Squire is the pick to win this match.
Henri Squire -> 1.65
Rudolf Molleker -> 2.13
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Rudolf Molleker vs. Henri Squire
This will be the 2nd time that Rudolf Molleker and Henri Squire fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Squire (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Squire won 5-3 ret. in the quarter in the Hamburg Challenger back in 2024.
Rudolf Molleker
25 - 20win/loss
398
146
LWLLWWWLLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 38-30 | 6-5 | 26-17 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 28-34 | 4-8 | 15-18 | 7-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-35 | 2-3 | 42-25 | 6-5 | 0-1 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 47-28 | 2-1 | 45-24 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 8-23 | 0-1 | 6-16 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 379, Molleker got to the qualifications after beating Stefan Latinovic 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Rudolf had a good straight sets win against Latinovic (6-4 6-4). During the match, Molleker scored 64 points vs Latinovic’s 52. Rudolf was exceptionally aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Molleker blasted 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Rudolf Molleker was very effective on serve to win 71% (24/34) of his 1st serve and 76% (19/25) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Molleker broke Latinovic twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Molleker has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 53% of his matches (256-226). 20-13 on clay in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Molleker has a composed190-137 win-loss record in the last 9 years on clay.
The German’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Bol.
Molleker has a compiled 25-20 win-loss record in 2025, 20-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Como Challenger
Henri Squire
23 - 25win/loss
278
169
LLWLWWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 41-32 | 1-3 | 31-21 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-31 | 1-3 | 21-13 | 19-12 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-38 | 7-4 | 30-25 | 15-6 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 38-31 | 1-2 | 8-11 | 27-16 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-12 | 0-0 | 21-8 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 5-3 |
Ranked no. 435, Henri reached the qualifications after defeating Carlo Alberto Fossati 6-0 6-3.
In the qualifications, Henri had a good straight sets win against Alberto Fossati (6-0 6-3). During the match Squire scored 56 points vs Alberto Fossati’s 31. The German was pretty aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Squire managed to score 4 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Henri Squire was pretty effective on serve to win 78% (29/37) of his 1st serve and 100% (3/3) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The German broke Alberto Fossati 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
The German’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Kramsach,M25 Koksijde and the Augsburg Challenger.
Squire has a composed 23-25 win-loss record in 2025, 16-17 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Molleker | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 15 |
| Pts | 64-52 | 56-31 |
| Total Points | 116 | 87 |
| Winners | 24 | 29 |
| %Winners | 38% | 52% |
Both Molleker and Squire played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Molleker and Squire have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Molleker played 5 games more than Squire. Rudolf scored 24 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The German bagged 29 winners (52%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Molleker | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 4 |
| 1st in | 34/59 | 37/40 |
| %1st in | 58% | 93% |
| 1st pts | 24/34 | 29/37 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 19/25 | 3/3 |
| %2nd pts | 76% | 100% |
Molleker recorded 7 aces . Squire blasted 4 aces . Molleker won 71% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 76% of the points. On the other side, Squire won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 100% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Molleker | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 4 |
| Converted | 2/4 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 50% | 44% |
| Conceded | 3 | 0 |
| Saved | 3 | 0 |
| % Saved | 100% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Molleker broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. Rudolf pretty solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 3 break points. Squire broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Squire was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Molleker | |||
| Q1 Latinovic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 64-52 | 64-52 | |
| Total points | 116 | 116 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 34/59 | 34/59 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 24/34 | 24/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/25 | 19/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 76% | 76% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Squire | |||
| Q1 Alberto Fossati |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 56-31 | 56-31 | |
| Total points | 87 | 87 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 52% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 37/40 | 37/40 | |
| % 1st in | 93% | 93% | |
| 1st pts | 29/37 | 29/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 3/3 | 3/3 | |
| % 2nd pts | 100% | 100% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWWWLLW
LLWLWWLWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio – Federico IannacconeIannaccone (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Henri SquireSquire (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tommaso CompagnucciCompagnucci – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Andrej MartinMartin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
