Ann Li and Sorana Cirstea will face off in the final of the Tennis in the Land for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 2:30 pm on STADIUM. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sorana Cirstea who should win in 2 sets.
Sorana Cirstea -> 1.4
Ann Li -> 2.95
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Ann Li vs. Sorana Cirstea
This will be the 2nd time that Ann Li and Sorana Cirstea fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Li (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Li won 6-3 6-1 in the quarter in Melbourne back in 2021.
Highlights Ann Li vs Sorana Cirstea – Melbourne 06-February-2021
Ann Li
23 - 20win/loss
38
33
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-25 | 20-15 | 7-6 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 42-27 | 16-14 | 22-9 | 4-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-28 | 16-13 | 15-9 | 4-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 16-20 | 7-10 | 2-3 | 4-3 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-14 | 19-8 | 1-1 | 4-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 69, the American reached the final after beating Yuliia Starodubtseva 7-5 6-3, Iva Jovic 6-3 2-6 6-3, Elsa Jacquemot 6-1 5-7 6-1 and Xinyu Wang 6-3 5-7 6-4.
In the semifinal, Li defeated Wang (6-3 5-7 6-4). During the match, Li scored 109 points vs Wang’s 99. Ann was quite aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about the service games, Li managed to score 3 aces and she committed only 1 double fault. Ann Li lost the serve 5 times and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Li put 58% of her first serves in, winning 72% (39/54) of the points behind her 1st serve and 41% (16/39) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Wang 6 times after converting 38% of her break points (6/16).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Ann has lost 3 set in this event to win 54% of the points she played.
Li has good record in the last 10 years having won 59% of her matches (254-173). 10-9 on hard in 2025. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this event, Li has a composed 140-95 match record in the last years on hard.
The American’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in Singapore.
Ann has an aggregate 23-19 win-loss record in 2025, 10-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Cleveland
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Sorana Cirstea
21 - 14win/loss
44
21
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 30-20 | 26-14 | 3-2 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 12-16 | 9-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-22 | 21-14 | 7-4 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 22-21 | 10-10 | 4-6 | 4-2 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-18 | 11-10 | 11-3 | 0-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 112, the Romanian reached the final after beating Anna Frey 6-1 6-0, Rebeka Masarova 6-2 6-2, Moyuka Uchijima 6-4 6-1, Jil Teichmann 6-1 6-1, Liudmila Samsonova 6-4 6-1 and Anastasia Zakharova 6-1 7-5.
In the semifinal, Sorana had a good straight sets win against Zakharova (6-1 7-5). During the match Cirstea scored 65 points vs Zakharova’s 43. The Romanian was extremely aggressive to blast 24 winners.
About the serving games, Cirstea made 5 aces and she committed only 5 double faults. Sorana Cirstea lost the serve twice and she saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Cirstea put 56% of her first serves in, winning 83% (24/29) of the points behind her 1st serve and 48% (11/23) on the 2nd serve. Sorana broke Zakharova 5 times after converting 71% of her break points (5/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Romanian started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this competition to win 63% of the points she played.
Cirstea’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in Iasi and Cleveland.
Cirstea has a compiled 20-14 win-loss record in 2025, 16-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Li | Cirstea |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 6 |
| Tot Set | 11 | 12 |
| Tot Games | 104 | 96 |
| Pts | 370-321 | 367-213 |
| Total Points | 691 | 580 |
| Winners | 124 | 129 |
| %Winners | 34% | 35% |
Li played 4 matches while Cirstea competed in 6 matches. Cirstea started her run from the qualifications while Li had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Ann Li dropped 3 sets while Sorana Cirstea hasn’t dropped a set so far. Li has played 1 set(s) less than Cirstea (11 vs 12). However, it’s interesting to notice that Li played 8 games more than Cirstea. Li scored 124 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, The Romanian fired 129 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Li | Cirstea |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 16 | 21 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 3.5 |
| 1st in | 176/321 | 175/296 |
| %1st in | 55% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 124/176 | 129/175 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 69/145 | 69/121 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 57% |
Li bagged 16 aces (4 per match). Cirstea bagged 21 aces (3.5 per match). Li won 70% points on her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Cirstea won 74% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Li | Cirstea |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 23 | 31 |
| Converted | 23/56 | 31/53 |
| % Converted | 41% | 58% |
| Conceded | 24 | 19 |
| Saved | 9 | 12 |
| % Saved | 38% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 15 | 7 |
Ann broke her opponents 23 times with a 41% conversion rate. Li lost her serve 15 times and she saved 38% of the break points that she conceded. Cirstea broke her opponents 31 times with a 58% conversion rate. The Romanian conceded her serve 7 times and she saved 63% of the break points that she conceded.
| Li | ||||||
| R1 Starodubtseva | R2 Jovic | 1/4 Jacquemot | 1/2 Wang | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | 6-1 5-7 6-1 | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 11 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 26 | 26 | 31 | 104 | |
| pts | 80-68 | 90-83 | 91-71 | 109-99 | 370-321 | |
| Total points | 148 | 173 | 162 | 208 | 691 | |
| Winners | 27 | 32 | 26 | 39 | 124 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 36% | 29% | 36% | 34% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 4 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 37/68 | 47/81 | 38/79 | 54/93 | 176/321 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 58% | 48% | 58% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 27/37 | 32/47 | 26/38 | 39/54 | 124/176 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 68% | 68% | 72% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/31 | 15/34 | 24/41 | 16/39 | 69/145 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 44% | 59% | 41% | 48% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 23 | |
| Converted | 5/14 | 5/12 | 7/14 | 6/16 | 23/56 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 42% | 50% | 38% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 24 | |
| Saved | 0/3 | 3/7 | 3/6 | 3/8 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 43% | 50% | 38% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 15 | |
| Cirstea | ||||||||
| Q1 Frey | Q3 Masarova | R1 Uchijima | R2 Belen Teichmann | 1/4 Samsonova | 1/2 Zakharova | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | 6-2 6-2 | 6-4 6-1 | 6-1 6-1 | 6-4 6-1 | 6-1 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 16 | 17 | 14 | 17 | 19 | 96 | |
| pts | 53-22 | 60-33 | 67-46 | 57-26 | 65-43 | 65-43 | 367-213 | |
| Total points | 75 | 93 | 113 | 83 | 108 | 108 | 580 | |
| Winners | 19 | 20 | 21 | 20 | 25 | 24 | 129 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 33% | 31% | 35% | 38% | 37% | 35% | |
| SERVE | ||||||||
| Aces | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 21 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 24/39 | 32/48 | 31/56 | 27/42 | 32/59 | 29/52 | 175/296 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 67% | 55% | 64% | 54% | 56% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 19/24 | 20/32 | 21/31 | 20/27 | 25/32 | 24/29 | 129/175 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 63% | 68% | 74% | 78% | 83% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/15 | 11/16 | 14/25 | 9/15 | 16/27 | 11/23 | 69/121 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 69% | 56% | 60% | 59% | 48% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||||||
| Won | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 31 | |
| Converted | 6/7 | 6/10 | 5/11 | 6/11 | 3/7 | 5/7 | 31/53 | |
| Converted % | 86% | 60% | 45% | 55% | 43% | 71% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 19 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 0/2 | 5/7 | 4/5 | 1/1 | 1/3 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 0% | 71% | 80% | 100% | 33% | 96% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | |
Tennis Scores in Cleveland
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (6-1 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sorana CirsteaCirstea – Ann LiLi (0-1) – H2H and prediction