Botic Van De Zandschulp and Marton Fucsovics will square off in the final of the Winston-Salem for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 5:00 pm on STADIUM. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marton Fucsovics who should win in 3 sets.
Marton Fucsovics -> 1.72
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 2.12
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Marton Fucsovics
This will be the 4th time that Botic Van De Zandschulp and Marton Fucsovics square off. The head to head is 2-1 for Van De Zandschulp (see full H2H stats), but Fucsovics leads 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they fought against each other, Van De Zandschulp won 3-6 7-6(2) 6-1 in the 1st round in Monte carlo back in 2023.
Highlights Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Marton Fucsovics – Monte carlo 10-April-2023
Botic Van De Zandschulp
24 - 22win/loss
77
22
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-32 | 13-11 | 11-10 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 92, Van De Zandschulp reached the final after beating Adam Walton 2-6 7-5 6-3, Matteo Arnaldi 6-3 6-3
, Sebastian Baez 0-6 6-1 6-4, Bu Yunchaokete 6-3 5-7 6-3 and Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard 6-4 7-5.In the semifinal, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Mpetshi Perricard (6-4 7-5). During the match, Van De Zandschulp scored 69 points vs Mpetshi Perricard’s 57. Botic was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Van De Zandschulp fired 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Botic Van De Zandschulp was exceptionally effective on serve to win 80% (28/35) of his 1st serve and 59% (16/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Dutch broke Mpetshi Perricard 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Botic has lost 3 set in this event to conquer 53% of the points he played.
Van De Zandschulp has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (347-217). 12-6 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Van De Zandschulp has a composed 73-49 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
The Dutch’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in Kitzbuhel and Salem.
Van De Zandschulp has a compiled 24-21 win-loss record in 2025, 12-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Winston-Salem
Marton Fucsovics
37 - 16win/loss
55
31
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 41-22 | 18-6 | 11-9 | 4-4 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 22-19 | 6-8 | 9-5 | 7-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-25 | 17-11 | 6-6 | 5-6 | 7-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-26 | 7-12 | 6-5 | 15-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-24 | 10-9 | 3-5 | 10-7 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 94, Fucsovics reached the final after beating Hugo Gaston 6-3 6-3, Tallon Griekspoor 6-3 4-6 6-3, Roberto Bautista Agut 6-4 6-3, Jaume Antoni Munar Clar 7-5 6-3 and Sebastian Korda w/o.
In the semifinal, Fucsovics defeated Korda (w/o). During the match Fucsovics and Korda scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 92 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. The Hungarian was not very aggressive do strike just winners.
Talking about serving, Fucsovics wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was very solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Marton Fucsovics conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (/) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (/) on the 2nd serve.
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Hungarian has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Manama Challenger where he overcame Andrea Vavassori in the final 6-3 6-7(3) 6-4.
Marton has a compiled 36-16 win-loss record in 2025, 14-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Winston-Salem
Previously, his best result was reaching the 3rd round in 2017, 2021 and 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Fucsovics |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 5 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 13 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 122 | 86 |
| Pts | 403-356 | 298-236 |
| Total Points | 759 | 534 |
| Winners | 167 | 116 |
| %Winners | 41% | 39% |
Van De Zandschulp played 5 matches while Fucsovics competed in 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Botic Van De Zandschulp dropped 3 sets, while Marton Fucsovics dropped 1 set. Van De Zandschulp has played 4 sets more than Fucsovics (13 vs 9). Therefore, Van De Zandschulp played 36 games more than Fucsovics. The Dutch scored 167 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Marton recorded 116 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Fucsovics |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 35 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 3 |
| 1st in | 217/354 | 144/242 |
| %1st in | 61% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 167/217 | 116/144 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 71/137 | 46/98 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 47% |
Van De Zandschulp recorded 35 aces (7 per match). Fucsovics bagged 12 aces (3 per match). Van De Zandschulp won 77% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Fucsovics won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Fucsovics |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 18 | 18 |
| Converted | 18/38 | 18/37 |
| % Converted | 47% | 49% |
| Conceded | 28 | 15 |
| Saved | 18 | 8 |
| % Saved | 64% | 53% |
| Times Broken | 10 | 7 |
The Dutch broke his opponents 18 times with a 47% conversion rate. The Dutch lost his serve 10 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded. The Hungarian broke his opponents 18 times with a 49% conversion rate. Marton conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 53% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van De Zandschulp | |||||||
| R1 Walton | R2 Arnaldi | R3 Baez | 1/4 Yunchaokete | 1/2 Mpetshi Perricard | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 7-5 6-3 | 6-3 6-3 | 0-6 6-1 6-4 | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 13 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 18 | 23 | 30 | 22 | 122 | |
| pts | 92-92 | 71-50 | 67-67 | 104-90 | 69-57 | 403-356 | |
| Total points | 184 | 121 | 134 | 194 | 126 | 759 | |
| Winners | 47 | 24 | 25 | 43 | 28 | 167 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 34% | 37% | 41% | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||||
| Aces | 15 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 35 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 22 | |
| 1st in | 59/92 | 27/47 | 37/65 | 59/88 | 35/62 | 217/354 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 57% | 57% | 67% | 56% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 47/59 | 24/27 | 25/37 | 43/59 | 28/35 | 167/217 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 89% | 68% | 73% | 80% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/33 | 12/20 | 13/28 | 15/29 | 16/27 | 71/137 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 60% | 46% | 52% | 59% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 18 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 3/8 | 5/7 | 5/12 | 3/6 | 18/38 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 38% | 71% | 42% | 50% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 0 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 28 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 0/0 | 7/11 | 5/8 | 1/2 | 18 | |
| Saved % | 71% | – | 64% | 63% | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 10 | |
| Fucsovics | |||||||
| R1 Gaston | R2 Griekspoor | R3 Bautista-Agut | 1/4 Munar Clar | 1/2 Korda | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | 6-4 6-3 | 7-5 6-3 | w/o | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | – | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 28 | 19 | 21 | – | 86 | |
| pts | 71-52 | 102-85 | 61-48 | 64-51 | – | 298-236 | |
| Total points | 123 | 187 | 109 | 115 | – | 534 | |
| Winners | 28 | 36 | 25 | 27 | – | 116 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 35% | 41% | 42% | – | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 | – | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | – | 9 | |
| 1st in | 35/56 | 46/84 | 28/50 | 35/52 | – | 144/242 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 55% | 56% | 67% | – | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 28/35 | 36/46 | 25/28 | 27/35 | – | 116/144 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 78% | 89% | 77% | – | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/21 | 18/38 | 13/22 | 5/17 | – | 46/98 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 47% | 59% | 29% | – | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 3 | 6 | – | 18 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 5/15 | 3/4 | 6/9 | – | 18/37 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 33% | 75% | 67% | – | 49% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 8 | 1 | 4 | – | 15 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 5/8 | 1/1 | 1/4 | – | 8 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 63% | 100% | 25% | – | 48% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | – | 7 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Marton FucsovicsFucsovics (2-1) – H2H and prediction