Xinyu Wang and Ann Li will fight against each other in the semifinal of the Tennis in the Land for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 7:30 pm on STADIUM. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Xinyu Wang who should win in 3 sets.
Xinyu Wang -> 1.68
Ann Li -> 2.19
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Xinyu Wang vs. Ann Li
This will be the 3rd time that Xinyu Wang and Ann Li clash against each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Wang (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Wang won 6-2 6-1 in the 1st round in Monterrey back in 2022.
Xinyu Wang
24 - 19win/loss
57
32
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 25-25 | 12-15 | 3-5 | 3-2 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 31-26 | 20-18 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-24 | 32-17 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-27 | 8-14 | 5-5 | 15-6 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-26 | 10-9 | 6-8 | 14-6 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 37, the Chinese got to the semifinal after defeating Suzan Lamens 6-2 6-7(3) 6-2, Talia Gibson 1-6 6-2 6-3 and Viktorija Golubic 4-6 6-4 6-4.
In the quarter against Golubic, Xinyu recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-4). During the match, Wang scored 100 points vs Golubic’s 91. Wang was exceptionally aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Wang blasted 5 aces and she committed only 6 double faults. Xinyu Wang lost the serve 4 times and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Wang put 55% of her first serves in, winning 67% (32/48) of the points behind her 1st serve and 54% (21/39) on the 2nd serve. The Chinese broke Golubic 5 times after converting 45% of her break points (5/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Wang has surrendered 3 set in this event to conquer 53% of the points she played.
Wang has favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 59% of her matches (255-175). 11-9 on hard in 2025. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Wang has an aggregate 153-109 match record in the last years on hard.
The Chinese’s best result of the year was reaching the final in Berlin.
Xinyu has a composed 24-18 win-loss record in 2025, 11-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Cleveland
Ann Li
23 - 19win/loss
38
33
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-25 | 20-15 | 7-6 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 42-27 | 16-14 | 22-9 | 4-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-28 | 16-13 | 15-9 | 4-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 16-20 | 7-10 | 2-3 | 4-3 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-14 | 19-8 | 1-1 | 4-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 69, Ann reached the semifinal after defeating Yuliia Starodubtseva 7-5 6-3, Iva Jovic 6-3 2-6 6-3 and Elsa Jacquemot 6-1 5-7 6-1.
In the quarter, Li defeated Jacquemot (6-1 5-7 6-1). During the match Li scored 91 points vs Jacquemot’s 71. The American was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, Li struck 3 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Ann Li lost the serve 3 times and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Li put 48% of her first serves in, winning 68% (26/38) of the points behind her 1st serve and 59% (24/41) on the 2nd serve. Li broke Jacquemot 7 times after converting 50% of her break points (7/14).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Li has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points she played.
The American’s best result of the year was getting to the final in Singapore.
Ann has a composed 22-19 win-loss record in 2025, 9-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Cleveland
Ann has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Wang | Li |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 9 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 83 | 73 |
| Pts | 273-240 | 261-222 |
| Total Points | 513 | 483 |
| Winners | 97 | 85 |
| %Winners | 36% | 33% |
Both Wang and Li played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Xinyu Wang conceded 3 sets, while Ann Li conceded 2 sets. Wang has played 1 set more than Li (9 vs 8). Therefore, Wang played 10 games more than Li. Xinyu scored 97 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Li struck 85 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Wang | Li |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 17 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 5.7 | 4.3 |
| 1st in | 137/241 | 122/228 |
| %1st in | 57% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 97/137 | 85/122 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 51/104 | 53/106 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 50% |
Wang bagged 17 aces (5.7 per match). Li made 13 aces (4.3 per match). Wang won 71% points on her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Li won 70% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Wang | Li |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 16 | 17 |
| Converted | 16/32 | 17/40 |
| % Converted | 50% | 43% |
| Conceded | 16 | 16 |
| Saved | 6 | 6 |
| % Saved | 38% | 38% |
| Times Broken | 10 | 10 |
The Chinese broke her opponents 16 times with a 50% conversion rate. Wang surrendered her serve 10 times and she saved 38% of the break points that she conceded. Li broke her opponents 17 times with a 43% conversion rate. The American conceded her serve 10 times and she saved 38% of the break points that she conceded.
| Wang | |||||
| R1 Lamens | R2 Gibson | 1/4 Golubic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-73 6-2 | 1-6 6-2 6-3 | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 24 | 30 | 83 | |
| pts | 100-81 | 73-68 | 100-91 | 273-240 | |
| Total points | 181 | 141 | 191 | 513 | |
| Winners | 37 | 28 | 32 | 97 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 38% | 32% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 7 | 5 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 3 | 6 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 52/87 | 37/67 | 48/87 | 137/241 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 55% | 55% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 37/52 | 28/37 | 32/48 | 97/137 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 76% | 67% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/35 | 13/30 | 21/39 | 51/104 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 43% | 54% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 7 | 4 | 5 | 16 | |
| Converted | 7/12 | 4/9 | 5/11 | 16/32 | |
| Converted % | 58% | 44% | 45% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | 6 | 16 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/6 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | 33% | 38% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10 | |
| Li | |||||
| R1 Starodubtseva | R2 Jovic | 1/4 Jacquemot | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | 6-1 5-7 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 26 | 26 | 73 | |
| pts | 80-68 | 90-83 | 91-71 | 261-222 | |
| Total points | 148 | 173 | 162 | 483 | |
| Winners | 27 | 32 | 26 | 85 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 36% | 29% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 6 | 3 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 3 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 37/68 | 47/81 | 38/79 | 122/228 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 58% | 48% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 27/37 | 32/47 | 26/38 | 85/122 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 68% | 68% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/31 | 15/34 | 24/41 | 53/106 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 44% | 59% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 7 | 17 | |
| Converted | 5/14 | 5/12 | 7/14 | 17/40 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 42% | 50% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 7 | 6 | 16 | |
| Saved | 0/3 | 3/7 | 3/6 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 43% | 50% | 31% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 | 3 | 10 | |
Tennis Scores in Cleveland
- Ji Sung NamSung Nam – Dudi SelaSela (6-3 5-3 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (6-4 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sorana CirsteaCirstea – Anastasia ZakharovaZakharova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ann LiLi – Xin Yu WangYu Wang (0-2) – H2H and prediction