Jaime Faria and Ugo Blanchet will face off in the qualifications of the U.S. Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 2:00 pm on Court 8. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jaime Faria who should win in 3 sets.
Jaime Faria -> 1.76
Ugo Blanchet -> 2.02
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jaime Faria vs. Ugo Blanchet
There is no head to head record between Jaime Faria and Ugo Blanchet since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Jaime Faria
20 - 19win/loss
149
87
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 25-28 | 9-6 | 9-15 | 2-5 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 53-25 | 24-5 | 27-14 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 49-31 | 33-17 | 16-12 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-24 | 20-12 | 23-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-10 | 6-6 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 118, Faria got to the qualifications after beating Rio Noguchi 3-6 6-4 6-3 and Giulio Zeppieri 7-6(5) 7-5.
In the qualifications, Faria had a good straight sets win against Zeppieri (7-65 7-5). During the match, Faria scored 92 points vs Zeppieri’s 89. Jaime was extremely aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Regarding the service games, Faria bagged 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Jaime Faria was extremely effective on serve to win 72% (39/54) of his 1st serve and 52% (17/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Jaime broke Zeppieri twice after converting 17% of his break points (2/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Faria started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in this tournament to conquer 52% of the points he played.
Faria has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 62% of his matches (177-109). 9-4 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Faria has an overall93-45 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
The Portuguese’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Sumter Challenger.
Faria has an aggregate 20-18 win-loss record in 2025, 9-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Ugo Blanchet
24 - 20win/loss
142
139
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 30-28 | 13-10 | 7-10 | 8-5 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 21-28 | 4-10 | 14-12 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-28 | 15-7 | 23-16 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-24 | 15-4 | 27-13 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-21 | 35-12 | 6-6 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 184, Blanchet got to the qualifications after defeating Borna Gojo 7-6(2) 3-6 6-3 and Dmitry Popko 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Ugo had a good straight sets win against Popko (6-3 6-4). During the match Blanchet scored 73 points vs Popko’s 61. Ugo was quite aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Blanchet scored 2 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Overall, Ugo Blanchet was extremely efficient on serve to win 79% (23/29) of his 1st serve and 52% (24/46) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Blanchet broke Popko 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Ugo started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Koblenz Challenger where he beat Luca Nardi in the final 6-3 3-6 7-6(5).
The French player has an overall 23-20 win-loss record in 2025, 8-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Faria | Blanchet |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 53 | 50 |
| Pts | 184-171 | 171-157 |
| Total Points | 355 | 328 |
| Winners | 75 | 72 |
| %Winners | 41% | 42% |
Both Faria and Blanchet played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Jaime Faria conceded 1 set, while Ugo Blanchet surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Faria and Blanchet have played the same amount of sets 5. However, Faria played 3 games more than Blanchet. Jaime scored 75 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Blanchet made 72 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Faria | Blanchet |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 17 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 8.5 | 4.5 |
| 1st in | 103/166 | 97/182 |
| %1st in | 62% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 75/103 | 72/97 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 31/63 | 47/85 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 55% |
Faria fired 17 aces (8.5 per match). Blanchet struck 9 aces (4.5 per match). Faria won 73% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Blanchet won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Faria | Blanchet |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 4 |
| Converted | 7/25 | 4/6 |
| % Converted | 28% | 67% |
| Conceded | 15 | 11 |
| Saved | 10 | 9 |
| % Saved | 67% | 82% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 2 |
Jaime broke his opponents 7 times with a 28% conversion rate. Faria surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The French player broke his opponents 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The French player conceded his serve twice and he saved 82% of the break points that he conceded.
| Faria | ||||
| Q1 Noguchi | Q2 Zeppieri | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | 7-65 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 25 | 53 | |
| pts | 92-82 | 92-89 | 184-171 | |
| Total points | 174 | 181 | 355 | |
| Winners | 36 | 39 | 75 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 42% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 10 | 7 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 49/79 | 54/87 | 103/166 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 36/49 | 39/54 | 75/103 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 72% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/30 | 17/33 | 31/63 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 52% | 49% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 2 | 7 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 2/12 | 7/25 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 17% | 28% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 5 | 15 | |
| Saved | 6/10 | 4/5 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 80% | 70% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| Blanchet | ||||
| Q1 Gojo | Q2 Popko | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 3-6 6-3 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 19 | 50 | |
| pts | 98-96 | 73-61 | 171-157 | |
| Total points | 194 | 134 | 328 | |
| Winners | 49 | 23 | 72 | |
| %Winners | 50% | 32% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 7 | 2 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 6 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 68/107 | 29/75 | 97/182 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 39% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 49/68 | 23/29 | 72/97 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 79% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/39 | 24/46 | 47/85 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 52% | 55% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| Converted | 1/1 | 3/5 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 60% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 6 | 11 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 5/6 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 83% | 82% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores – U.S. Open
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Fajing SunSun (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Leandro RiediRiedi – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (7-68 6-4) – See score progression
- Martin DammDamm – Benjamin HassanHassan (7-5 7-65) – See score progression
- Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz – Andres MartinMartin (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Taro DanielDaniel (2-6 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez (4-6 7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- James DuckworthDuckworth – James McCabeMcCabe (7-5 5-7 7-65) – See score progression
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Federico CinaCina (6-3 2-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga (6-4 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Ignacio BuseBuse – Rei SakamotoSakamoto (6-4 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Martin LandaluceLandaluce (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili (7-64 7-5) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Matteo GiganteGigante (4-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (6-75 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Jay ClarkeClarke (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Dino PrizmicPrizmic – Murphy CassoneCassone (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Cristian GarinGarin (7-63 7-5) – See score progression
- Garrett JohnsJohns – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Jerome KymKym – Michael ZhengZheng (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Harold MayotMayot (7-611 6-74 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel Merida AguilarMerida Aguilar – Titouan DroguetDroguet (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Alexander BlockxBlockx (7-65 ret.) – See score progression
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Kyrian JacquetJacquet (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Jaime FariaFaria – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (7-65 7-5) – See score progression
- Yibing WuWu – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (7-65 7-5) – See score progression
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – Dmitry PopkoPopko (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Henrique RochaRocha – Bernard TomicTomic (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Andrea CollariniCollarini (7-64 7-5) – See score progression
- Jerome KymKym – Michael ZhengZheng (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Yibing WuWu – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – Dmitry PopkoPopko (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Jacob FearnleyFearnley (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gael MonfilsMonfils – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Novak DjokovicDjokovic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Denis ShapovalovShapovalov (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Corentin MoutetMoutet (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Benjamin BonziBonzi (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ZverevZverev – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laslo DjereDjere – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander BublikBublik – Marin CilicCilic (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Alex De MinaurDe Minaur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Quentin HalysHalys – David GoffinGoffin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Karen KhachanovKhachanov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Casper RuudRuud (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Sebastian KordaKorda (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Reilly OpelkaOpelka – Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (3-3) – H2H and prediction
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Alexandre MullerMuller (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo SonegoSonego – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zizou BergsBergs – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ugo HumbertHumbert – Adam WaltonWalton (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Aleksandar VukicVukic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (6-6) – H2H and prediction
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Vit KoprivaKopriva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Borna CoricCoric (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Marcos GironGiron (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan DostanicDostanic – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (0-0) – H2H and prediction