Jerome Kym and Yibing Wu will square off in the qualifications of the U.S. Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 2:30 pm on Court 4. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jerome Kym who should win in 3 sets.
Jerome Kym -> 1.76
Yibing Wu -> 2.02
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jerome Kym vs. Yibing Wu
There is no head to head record between Jerome Kym and Yibing Wu since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Jerome Kym
22 - 17win/loss
184
123
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 24-20 | 6-3 | 17-13 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 59-20 | 14-4 | 37-11 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-9 | 0-0 | 18-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2022 | 41-22 | 17-5 | 12-9 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 3-3 |
| 2021 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 176, Jerome reached the qualifications after beating Carlos Taberner 7-6(2) 6-1 and Michael Zheng 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Jerome had a good straight sets win against Zheng (6-3 6-4). During the match, Kym scored 64 points vs Zheng’s 54. Kym was quite aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kym scored 9 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Jerome Kym was pretty efficient on serve to win 90% (27/30) of his 1st serve and 56% (15/27) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Jerome broke Zheng twice after converting 25% of his break points (2/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Kym started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t conceded yet a set in this event to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Kym has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 66% of his matches (152-78). 3-2 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Kym has a composed34-11 record in the last 7 years on hard.
Jerome’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Mauthausen Challenger,the Vicenza Challenger,the Modena Challenger and the Hagen Challenger.
Jerome has an overall 21-17 win-loss record in 2025, 3-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Yibing Wu
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 25-10 | 23-8 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 9-5 | 7-4 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 18-17 | 5-7 | 3-5 | 9-1 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-7 | 20-5 | 10-2 | 10-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 178, Yibing got to the qualifications after beating Juan Pablo Ficovich 6-3 6-3 and Luca Van Assche 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, Yibing had a good straight sets win against Van Assche (6-3 6-3). During the match Wu scored 71 points vs Van Assche’s 54. Yibing was extremely aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Wu managed to score 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Yibing Wu was exceptionally effective on serve to win 79% (26/33) of his 1st serve and 62% (16/26) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Yibing broke Van Assche 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Wu started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this tournament to win 58% of the points he played.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Tyler Challenger where he beat Yi Zhou in the final 6-4 3-6 6-3.
The Chinese has an overall 22-7 win-loss record in 2025, 20-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Previously, his best result was reaching the 3rd round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kym | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 39 | 36 |
| Pts | 141-111 | 133-97 |
| Total Points | 252 | 230 |
| Winners | 56 | 52 |
| %Winners | 40% | 39% |
Both Kym and Wu played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Kym and Wu have played the same amount of sets 4. However, Kym played 3 games more than Wu. Kym scored 56 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The Chinese bagged 52 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kym | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 20 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 5 |
| 1st in | 63/113 | 63/105 |
| %1st in | 56% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 56/63 | 52/63 |
| %1st pts | 89% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 27/50 | 26/42 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 62% |
Kym managed to score 20 aces (10 per match). Wu bagged 10 aces (5 per match). Kym won 89% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Wu won 83% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kym | Wu |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 6 |
| Converted | 6/14 | 6/13 |
| % Converted | 43% | 46% |
| Conceded | 6 | 7 |
| Saved | 5 | 7 |
| % Saved | 83% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
Jerome broke his opponents 6 times with a 43% conversion rate. Jerome conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. Wu broke his opponents 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. Wu was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 7 break points.
| Kym | ||||
| Q1 Taberner | Q2 Zheng | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-1 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 19 | 39 | |
| pts | 77-57 | 64-54 | 141-111 | |
| Total points | 134 | 118 | 252 | |
| Winners | 29 | 27 | 56 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 42% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 11 | 9 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 33/56 | 30/57 | 63/113 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 53% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 29/33 | 27/30 | 56/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 90% | 89% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/23 | 15/27 | 27/50 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 56% | 54% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 2/8 | 6/14 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 25% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 2/2 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 100% | 88% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Wu | ||||
| Q1 Pablo Ficovich | Q2 Van | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | 36 | |
| pts | 62-43 | 71-54 | 133-97 | |
| Total points | 105 | 125 | 230 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | 52 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 37% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 30/46 | 33/59 | 63/105 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 56% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 26/30 | 26/33 | 52/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 79% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/16 | 16/26 | 26/42 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/6 | 6/13 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 50% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 7/7 | 7 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores – U.S. Open
- Martin DammDamm – Benjamin HassanHassan (7-5 7-65) – See score progression
- Daniel Merida AguilarMerida Aguilar – Titouan DroguetDroguet (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Alexander BlockxBlockx (7-65 ret.) – See score progression
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Federico CinaCina (6-3 2-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Jaime FariaFaria – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (7-65 7-5) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Jay ClarkeClarke (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz – Andres MartinMartin (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Henrique RochaRocha – Bernard TomicTomic (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Cristian GarinGarin (7-63 7-5) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Fajing SunSun (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Ignacio BuseBuse – Rei SakamotoSakamoto (6-4 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili (7-64 7-5) – See score progression
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Martin LandaluceLandaluce (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez (4-6 7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Leandro RiediRiedi – Otto VirtanenVirtanen (7-68 6-4) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Matteo GiganteGigante (4-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (6-75 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Garrett JohnsJohns – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Dino PrizmicPrizmic – Murphy CassoneCassone (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Taro DanielDaniel (2-6 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Harold MayotMayot (7-611 6-74 6-3) – See score progression
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Kyrian JacquetJacquet (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- James DuckworthDuckworth – James McCabeMcCabe (7-5 5-7 7-65) – See score progression
- Yibing WuWu – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (7-65 7-5) – See score progression
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – Dmitry PopkoPopko (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jerome KymKym – Michael ZhengZheng (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Andrea CollariniCollarini (7-64 7-5) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga (6-4 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Jerome KymKym – Michael ZhengZheng (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Yibing WuWu – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel Merida AguilarMerida Aguilar – Titouan DroguetDroguet (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez (4-6 7-6(2) 6-4) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga (6-4 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Jaime FariaFaria – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (7-6(5) 7-5) – See score progression
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – Dmitry PopkoPopko (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Jacob FearnleyFearnley (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gael MonfilsMonfils – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Novak DjokovicDjokovic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian MannarinoMannarino – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Denis ShapovalovShapovalov (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Corentin MoutetMoutet (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Benjamin BonziBonzi (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ZverevZverev – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laslo DjereDjere – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander BublikBublik – Marin CilicCilic (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Alex De MinaurDe Minaur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Quentin HalysHalys – David GoffinGoffin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Karen KhachanovKhachanov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Casper RuudRuud (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Sebastian KordaKorda (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Reilly OpelkaOpelka – Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (3-3) – H2H and prediction
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Alexandre MullerMuller (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo SonegoSonego – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuno BorgesBorges – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zizou BergsBergs – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ugo HumbertHumbert – Adam WaltonWalton (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Aleksandar VukicVukic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (6-6) – H2H and prediction
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Vit KoprivaKopriva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Borna CoricCoric (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Marcos GironGiron (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan DostanicDostanic – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (0-0) – H2H and prediction