Destanee Aiava and Justina Mikulskyte will clash against each other in the qualifications of the U.S. Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on Court 15. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Destanee Aiava who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Destanee Aiava is the pick to win this match.
Destanee Aiava -> 1.55
Justina Mikulskyte -> 2.39
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Destanee Aiava vs. Justina Mikulskyte
There is no head to head record between Destanee Aiava and Justina Mikulskyte since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Destanee Aiava
16 - 16win/loss
238
147
LLLWWLLLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 19-22 | 10-14 | 0-1 | 7-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 44-26 | 38-19 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 47-24 | 41-19 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-13 | 27-11 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 3-11 | 2-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 168, the Australian got to the qualifications after defeating Sara Bejlek 6-4 4-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, Destanee defeated Bejlek (6-4 4-6 6-4). During the match, Aiava scored 105 points vs Bejlek’s 94. Destanee was quite aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about the service games, Aiava scored just 1 ace throughout the match and she committed only 5 double faults. Destanee Aiava lost the serve 7 times and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Aiava put 60% of her first serves in, winning 63% (35/56) of the points behind her 1st serve and 42% (16/38) on the 2nd serve. Destanee broke Bejlek 8 times after converting 57% of her break points (8/14).
Aiava has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 61% of her matches (259-169). 6-8 on hard in 2025. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this competition, Aiava has a compiled 194-117 record in the last years on hard.
Destanee’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the W75 Prague.
The Australian has a compiled 15-16 win-loss record in 2025, 6-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Justina Mikulskyte
28 - 21win/loss
226
196
LWWWWLLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 43-33 | 19-14 | 11-10 | 13-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 42-34 | 14-6 | 19-16 | 9-11 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-37 | 14-11 | 25-14 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2022 | 33-31 | 14-12 | 14-11 | 5-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 46-27 | 21-8 | 23-14 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 200, the Lithuanian reached the qualifications after beating Kyoka Okamura 6-3 7-5.
In the qualifications, Mikulskyte had a good straight sets win against Okamura (6-3 7-5). During the match Mikulskyte scored 72 points vs Okamura’s 61. The Lithuanian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 19 winners.
About the serving games, Mikulskyte blasted 4 aces and she committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Justina Mikulskyte was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 76% (19/25) of her 1st serve and 63% (17/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. Justina broke Okamura 4 times after converting 31% of her break points (4/13).
Her best result of the current year was winning the title the W50 Porto where she beat Tyra Caterina Grant in the final 6-7(2) 6-3 6-2.
Mikulskyte has an overall 28-20 win-loss record in 2025, 8-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
The Lithuanian has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Aiava | Mikulskyte |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 21 |
| Pts | 105-94 | 72-61 |
| Total Points | 199 | 133 |
| Winners | 35 | 19 |
| %Winners | 33% | 26% |
Both Aiava and Mikulskyte played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Destanee Aiava surrendered 1 set while Justina Mikulskyte hasn’t dropped a set so far. Aiava has played 1 set more than Mikulskyte (3 vs 2). Therefore, Aiava played 9 games more than Mikulskyte. Destanee scored 35 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Justina blasted 19 winners (26%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Aiava | Mikulskyte |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 4 |
| 1st in | 56/94 | 25/52 |
| %1st in | 60% | 48% |
| 1st pts | 35/56 | 19/25 |
| %1st pts | 63% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 16/38 | 17/27 |
| %2nd pts | 42% | 63% |
Aiava blasted 1 ace . Mikulskyte also scored 4 aces . Aiava won 63% points on her first serve. She quite strong on her second serve to win 42% of the points. On the other side, Mikulskyte won 76% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Aiava | Mikulskyte |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 4 |
| Converted | 8/14 | 4/13 |
| % Converted | 57% | 31% |
| Conceded | 13 | 1 |
| Saved | 6 | 0 |
| % Saved | 46% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 7 | 1 |
The Australian broke her opponent 8 times with a 57% conversion rate. Destanee surrendered her serve 7 times and she saved 46% of the break points that she conceded. The Lithuanian broke her opponent 4 times with a 31% conversion rate. Justina conceded her serve once and she saved 0% of the break points that she conceded.
| Aiava | |||
| Q1 Bejlek |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 105-94 | 105-94 | |
| Total points | 199 | 199 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 56/94 | 56/94 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 35/56 | 35/56 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/38 | 16/38 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 8 | 8 | |
| Converted | 8/14 | 8/14 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 6/13 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 46% | 46% | |
| Times Broken | 7 | 7 | |
| Mikulskyte | |||
| Q1 Okamura |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 72-61 | 72-61 | |
| Total points | 133 | 133 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 26% | 26% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 25/52 | 25/52 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 48% | |
| 1st pts | 19/25 | 19/25 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/27 | 17/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/13 | 4/13 | |
| Converted % | 31% | 31% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWLLLWW
LWWWWLLWWW Tennis Scores – U.S. Open
- Veronika ErjavecErjavec – Maria TimofeevaTimofeeva (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Linda KlimovicovaKlimovicova – Alina KorneevaKorneeva (7-64 6-72 6-4) – See score progression
- Ayana AkliAkli – Eva VedderVedder (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Guiomar Zuleta De RealesZuleta De Reales – Tiantsoa Rakotomanga RajaonahRakotomanga Rajaonah (6-2 7-64) – See score progression
- Aoi ItoIto – Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam (6-4 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Iryna ShymanovichShymanovich – Sinja KrausKraus (6-3 2-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini – Vitalia DiatchenkoDiatchenko (7-66 6-2) – See score progression
- Jessika PonchetPonchet – Elizabeth MandlikMandlik (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Cadence BraceBrace – Nao HibinoHibino (2-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Lizette CabreraCabrera – Oleksandra OliynykovaOliynykova (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Jule NiemeierNiemeier – Daria SavilleSaville (6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Francesca JonesJones – Viktoria HruncakovaHruncakova (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Justina MikulskyteMikulskyte – Kyoka OkamuraOkamura (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Carol ZhaoZhao – Maria Lourdes CarleLourdes Carle (7-68 6-2) – See score progression
- Ekaterine GorgodzeGorgodze – Heather WatsonWatson (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Destanee AiavaAiava – Sara BejlekBejlek (6-4 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Ella SeidelSeidel – Kathinka Von DeichmannVon Deichmann (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Maja ChwalinskaChwalinska – Georgia PedonePedone (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Darja VidmanovaVidmanova – Maya IyengarIyengar (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Darja SemenistajaSemenistaja – Andrea Lazaro GarciaLazaro Garcia (2-6 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Leyre Romero GormazRomero Gormaz – Celine NaefNaef (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Shuai ZhangZhang – Mary StoianaStoiana (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Priscilla HonHon – Nuria BrancaccioBrancaccio (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Arianne HartonoHartono – Ana Sofia SanchezSofia Sanchez (2-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Janice TjenTjen – Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Sachia VickeryVickery – Anastasiia SobolievaSobolieva (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Harriet DartDart – Anca Alexia TodoniAlexia Todoni (7-5 6-73 7-66) – See score progression
- Viktoriya TomovaTomova – Irene BurilloBurillo (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Olivia GadeckiGadecki – Anouk KoevermansKoevermans (3-6 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Sijia WeiWei – Berfu CengizCengiz (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Hanne VandewinkelVandewinkel – Marina StakusicStakusic (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Oksana SelekhmetevaSelekhmeteva – Julia RieraRiera (2-6 6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Elena PridankinaPridankina – Barbora PalicovaPalicova (5-7 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Tessah AndrianjafitrimoAndrianjafitrimo – Polona HercogHercog (5-7 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Panna UdvardyUdvardy – Paula OrmaecheaOrmaechea (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Xiyu WangWang – Carson BranstineBranstine (3-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Victoria Jimenez KasintsevaJimenez Kasintseva – Alexis NguyenNguyen (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Laura PigossiPigossi – Tamara ZidansekZidansek (5-7 7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Fiona CrawleyCrawley – Louisa ChiricoChirico (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Dalma GalfiGalfi – Akasha UrhoboUrhobo (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Emerson JonesJones – Bernarda PeraPera (6-1 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Madison BrengleBrengle (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Jana FettFett – Joanna GarlandGarland (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Astra SharmaSharma – Lola RadivojevicRadivojevic (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Arantxa RusRus – Carlota Martinez CirezMartinez Cirez (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Alina CharaevaCharaeva – Monika EkstrandEkstrand (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Tatiana ProzorovaProzorova – Martina TrevisanTrevisan (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Hina InoueInoue – Lauren DavisDavis (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Petra MarticMartic – Linda FruhvirtovaFruhvirtova (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Claire LiuLiu – Katarzyna KawaKawa (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Kristina DmitrukDmitruk – Kaja JuvanJuvan (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Ena ShibaharaShibahara – Kayla DayDay (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Petra MarcinkoMarcinko – Xinyu GaoGao (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Simona WaltertWaltert – Daria SnigurSnigur (4-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Sofia CostoulasCostoulas (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Tara WuerthWuerth – Arina RodionovaRodionova (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Manon LeonardLeonard – Sada NahimanaNahimana (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Maddison InglisInglis – Storm HunterHunter (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jodie Anna BurrageAnna Burrage – Patricia Maria TigMaria Tig (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Amelia HonerHoner – Whitney OsuigweOsuigwe (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Dominika SalkovaSalkova – Julia GrabherGrabher (7-5 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Mai HontamaHontama – Kristina PenickovaPenickova (6-0 4-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Rebecca MarinoMarino – Lanlana TararudeeTararudee (6-3 2-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Tereza ValentovaValentova – Mona BarthelBarthel (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Francesca JonesJones – Ekaterine GorgodzeGorgodze (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arianne HartonoHartono – Olivia GadeckiGadecki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jodie Anna BurrageAnna Burrage – Arantxa RusRus (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maja ChwalinskaChwalinska – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalma GalfiGalfi – Fiona CrawleyCrawley (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manon LeonardLeonard – Panna UdvardyUdvardy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktoriya TomovaTomova – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jule NiemeierNiemeier – Priscilla HonHon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tessah AndrianjafitrimoAndrianjafitrimo – Jana FettFett (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Destanee AiavaAiava – Justina MikulskyteMikulskyte (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sachia VickeryVickery – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shuai ZhangZhang – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sijia WeiWei – Leyre Romero GormazRomero Gormaz (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Astra SharmaSharma – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Petra MarticMartic – Xiyu WangWang (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Rebecca MarinoMarino (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Carol ZhaoZhao – Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hina InoueInoue – Simona WaltertWaltert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Claire LiuLiu – Maddison InglisInglis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
