Janice Tjen and Maja Chwalinska will clash against each other in the qualifications of the U.S. Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 11:00 am on Court 5. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Janice Tjen who should win in 3 sets.
Janice Tjen -> 1.52
Maja Chwalinska -> 2.47
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Janice Tjen vs. Maja Chwalinska
There is no head to head record between Janice Tjen and Maja Chwalinska since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Janice Tjen
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 77-15 | 72-15 | 0-0 | 5-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 41-3 | 28-2 | 13-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 7-3 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 147 (career-high), Tjen reached the qualifications after defeating Varvara Lepchenko 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Indonesian had a good straight sets win against Lepchenko (6-3 6-1). During the match, Tjen scored 60 points vs Lepchenko’s 41. Janice was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Tjen recorded 3 aces and she committed only 1 double fault. Janice Tjen lost the serve once. Furthermore, Tjen put 69% of her first serves in, winning 79% (26/33) of the points behind her 1st serve and 40% (6/15) on the 2nd serve. Janice broke Lepchenko 5 times after converting 71% of her break points (5/7).
Tjen has a fantastic record in the last 4 years having won 85% of her matches (105-19). 51-10 on hard in 2025. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this competition, Tjen has an aggregate87-18 match record in the last 4 years on hard.
Her best result of the season was winning the title the W35 Goyang where she beat Lin Zhu in the final 6-4 6-1 and the W35 Andong where she defeated Yexin Ma in the final 6-4 6-2 and the W35 Luzhou where she defeated Fangzhou Liu in the final 6-0 6-4 and the W50 Taizhou where she beat Yidi Yang in the final 7-5 6-3 and the W35 Taipei where she overcame Momoko Kobori in the final 4-6 6-1 6-2.
Tjen has a compiled 56-10 win-loss record in 2025, 51-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Tjen has never competed in this tournament before.
Maja Chwalinska
15 - 16win/loss
133
121
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 25-18 | 4-2 | 19-12 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 1-1 |
| 2024 | 48-21 | 12-6 | 27-10 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2023 | 23-19 | 8-6 | 12-10 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-15 | 13-5 | 16-6 | 5-2 | 6-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 10-11 | 3-3 | 1-2 | 4-4 | 0-1 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 177, the Pole got to the qualifications after defeating Georgia Pedone 6-2 6-0.
In the qualifications, Maja had a good straight sets win against Pedone (6-2 6-0). During the match Chwalinska scored 61 points vs Pedone’s 35. The Pole was quite aggressive to blast 19 winners.
About the serving games, Chwalinska was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she was very solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Maja Chwalinska conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 1 break points. Furthermore, Chwalinska put 64% of her first serves in, winning 66% (19/29) of the points behind her 1st serve and 81% (13/16) on the 2nd serve. Chwalinska broke Pedone 5 times after converting 56% of her break points (5/9).
Chwalinska’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in the Antalya.
The Pole has an aggregate 15-15 win-loss record in 2025, 4-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Previously, her best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tjen | Chwalinska |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 14 |
| Pts | 60-41 | 61-35 |
| Total Points | 101 | 96 |
| Winners | 26 | 19 |
| %Winners | 43% | 31% |
Both Tjen and Chwalinska played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Tjen and Chwalinska have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Tjen played 2 games more than Chwalinska. Janice scored 26 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Chwalinska scored 19 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tjen | Chwalinska |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 0 |
| 1st in | 33/48 | 29/45 |
| %1st in | 69% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 26/33 | 19/29 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 6/15 | 13/16 |
| %2nd pts | 40% | 81% |
Tjen recorded 3 aces . Chwalinska didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Tjen won 79% points behind her first serve. She extremely effective on her second serve to win 40% of the points. On the other side, Chwalinska won 66% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 81% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tjen | Chwalinska |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 71% | 56% |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 |
| Saved | 0 | 1 |
| % Saved | 0% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The Indonesian broke her opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Tjen dropped her serve once and she saved 0% of the break points that she conceded. Chwalinska broke her opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Maja was rock solid on her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Tjen | |||
| Q1 Lepchenko | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 60-41 | 60-41 | |
| Total points | 101 | 101 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 33/48 | 33/48 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 26/33 | 26/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/15 | 6/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 40% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Chwalinska | |||
| Q1 Pedone | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 61-35 | 61-35 | |
| Total points | 96 | 96 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 29/45 | 29/45 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 19/29 | 19/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/16 | 13/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 81% | 81% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores – U.S. Open
- Priscilla HonHon – Nuria BrancaccioBrancaccio (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Janice TjenTjen – Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Carol ZhaoZhao – Maria Lourdes CarleLourdes Carle (7-68 6-2) – See score progression
- Ayana AkliAkli – Eva VedderVedder (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Viktoriya TomovaTomova – Irene BurilloBurillo (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Destanee AiavaAiava – Sara BejlekBejlek (6-4 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Oksana SelekhmetevaSelekhmeteva – Julia RieraRiera (2-6 6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Arianne HartonoHartono – Ana Sofia SanchezSofia Sanchez (2-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Jessika PonchetPonchet – Elizabeth MandlikMandlik (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Cadence BraceBrace – Nao HibinoHibino (2-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Leyre Romero GormazRomero Gormaz – Celine NaefNaef (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Guiomar Zuleta De RealesZuleta De Reales – Tiantsoa Rakotomanga RajaonahRakotomanga Rajaonah (6-2 7-64) – See score progression
- Linda KlimovicovaKlimovicova – Alina KorneevaKorneeva (7-64 6-72 6-4) – See score progression
- Sachia VickeryVickery – Anastasiia SobolievaSobolieva (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini – Vitalia DiatchenkoDiatchenko (7-66 6-2) – See score progression
- Ekaterine GorgodzeGorgodze – Heather WatsonWatson (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Sijia WeiWei – Berfu CengizCengiz (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Hanne VandewinkelVandewinkel – Marina StakusicStakusic (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Maja ChwalinskaChwalinska – Georgia PedonePedone (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Darja SemenistajaSemenistaja – Andrea Lazaro GarciaLazaro Garcia (2-6 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Veronika ErjavecErjavec – Maria TimofeevaTimofeeva (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Jule NiemeierNiemeier – Daria SavilleSaville (6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Francesca JonesJones – Viktoria HruncakovaHruncakova (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Justina MikulskyteMikulskyte – Kyoka OkamuraOkamura (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Harriet DartDart – Anca Alexia TodoniAlexia Todoni (7-5 6-73 7-66) – See score progression
- Aoi ItoIto – Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam (6-4 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Shuai ZhangZhang – Mary StoianaStoiana (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Iryna ShymanovichShymanovich – Sinja KrausKraus (6-3 2-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Ella SeidelSeidel – Kathinka Von DeichmannVon Deichmann (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Darja VidmanovaVidmanova – Maya IyengarIyengar (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Olivia GadeckiGadecki – Anouk KoevermansKoevermans (3-6 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Lizette CabreraCabrera – Oleksandra OliynykovaOliynykova (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Sofia CostoulasCostoulas (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Tatiana ProzorovaProzorova – Martina TrevisanTrevisan (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Amelia HonerHoner – Whitney OsuigweOsuigwe (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Manon LeonardLeonard – Sada NahimanaNahimana (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Hina InoueInoue – Lauren DavisDavis (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Petra MarticMartic – Linda FruhvirtovaFruhvirtova (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Dominika SalkovaSalkova – Julia GrabherGrabher (7-5 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Dalma GalfiGalfi – Akasha UrhoboUrhobo (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Jana FettFett – Joanna GarlandGarland (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Simona WaltertWaltert – Daria SnigurSnigur (4-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Astra SharmaSharma – Lola RadivojevicRadivojevic (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Elena PridankinaPridankina – Barbora PalicovaPalicova (5-7 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Xiyu WangWang – Carson BranstineBranstine (3-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Laura PigossiPigossi – Tamara ZidansekZidansek (5-7 7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Claire LiuLiu – Katarzyna KawaKawa (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Fiona CrawleyCrawley – Louisa ChiricoChirico (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Maddison InglisInglis – Storm HunterHunter (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jodie Anna BurrageAnna Burrage – Patricia Maria TigMaria Tig (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Emerson JonesJones – Bernarda PeraPera (6-1 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Madison BrengleBrengle (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Tereza ValentovaValentova – Mona BarthelBarthel (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Tara WuerthWuerth – Arina RodionovaRodionova (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Arantxa RusRus – Carlota Martinez CirezMartinez Cirez (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Alina CharaevaCharaeva – Monika EkstrandEkstrand (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Tessah AndrianjafitrimoAndrianjafitrimo – Polona HercogHercog (5-7 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Panna UdvardyUdvardy – Paula OrmaecheaOrmaechea (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Victoria Jimenez KasintsevaJimenez Kasintseva – Alexis NguyenNguyen (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Kristina DmitrukDmitruk – Kaja JuvanJuvan (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Petra MarcinkoMarcinko – Xinyu GaoGao (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Ena ShibaharaShibahara – Kayla DayDay (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Mai HontamaHontama – Kristina PenickovaPenickova (6-0 4-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Rebecca MarinoMarino – Lanlana TararudeeTararudee (6-3 2-6 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Francesca JonesJones – Ekaterine GorgodzeGorgodze (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arianne HartonoHartono – Olivia GadeckiGadecki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jodie Anna BurrageAnna Burrage – Arantxa RusRus (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maja ChwalinskaChwalinska – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalma GalfiGalfi – Fiona CrawleyCrawley (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manon LeonardLeonard – Panna UdvardyUdvardy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktoriya TomovaTomova – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jule NiemeierNiemeier – Priscilla HonHon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tessah AndrianjafitrimoAndrianjafitrimo – Jana FettFett (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Destanee AiavaAiava – Justina MikulskyteMikulskyte (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sachia VickeryVickery – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shuai ZhangZhang – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sijia WeiWei – Leyre Romero GormazRomero Gormaz (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Astra SharmaSharma – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Petra MarticMartic – Xiyu WangWang (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Rebecca MarinoMarino (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Carol ZhaoZhao – Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hina InoueInoue – Simona WaltertWaltert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Claire LiuLiu – Maddison InglisInglis (0-0) – H2H and prediction