Mitchell Krueger and Andrea Collarini will play each other in the qualifications of the U.S. Open for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 2:00 pm on Court 11. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mitchell Krueger who should win in 4 sets.
Mitchell Krueger -> 1.42
Andrea Collarini -> 2.78
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Mitchell Krueger vs. Andrea Collarini
This will be the 3rd time that Mitchell Krueger and Andrea Collarini fight against each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Collarini (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on hard.
The last time that they played each other, Collarini won 7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(5) in the 2nd round in the Sarasota Challenger back in 2019.
Mitchell Krueger
18 - 24win/loss
205
135
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-32 | 12-17 | 9-7 | 7-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 42-31 | 30-17 | 9-7 | 2-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-29 | 15-19 | 4-4 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-28 | 18-15 | 6-5 | 1-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-24 | 19-12 | 5-5 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 186, Krueger reached the qualifications after defeating Santiago Rodriguez Taverna 6-3 5-7 6-1.
In the qualifications, Mitchell defeated Rodriguez Taverna (6-3 5-7 6-1). During the match, Krueger scored 96 points vs Rodriguez Taverna’s 78. Mitchell was pretty aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Regarding the service games, Krueger scored 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Mitchell Krueger lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Krueger put 68% of his first serves in, winning 78% (46/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (13/28) on the 2nd serve. Mitchell broke Rodriguez Taverna 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Krueger has won exactly 50% of his matches (281-279) in the last 10 years. 7-13 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Krueger has a composed 193-167 record in the last years on hard.
The American’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Oeiras 5 Challenger.
Mitchell has a composed 17-24 win-loss record in 2025, 7-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Andrea Collarini
28 - 24win/loss
272
177
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 41-32 | 1-3 | 40-28 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 45-26 | 0-1 | 45-25 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 26-32 | 0-3 | 26-28 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-30 | 3-3 | 20-26 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-37 | 0-2 | 25-34 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 241, Andrea reached the qualifications after beating Jan Choinski 7-6(4) 6-4.
In the qualifications, Collarini had a good straight sets win against Choinski (7-64 6-4). During the match Collarini scored 79 points vs Choinski’s 70. The Argentine was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Collarini recorded 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Andrea Collarini lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Collarini put 60% of his first serves in, winning 67% (28/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 61% (17/28) on the 2nd serve. Andrea broke Choinski 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
The Argentine’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Punta del Este,the Tallahassee Challenger,the San Miguel de Tucuman Challenger and the Santa Fe Challenger.
The Argentine has a compiled 28-23 win-loss record in 2025, 1-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Krueger | Collarini |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 23 |
| Pts | 96-78 | 79-70 |
| Total Points | 174 | 149 |
| Winners | 46 | 28 |
| %Winners | 48% | 35% |
Both Krueger and Collarini played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Mitchell Krueger surrendered 1 set while Andrea Collarini hasn’t dropped a set so far. Krueger has played 1 set more than Collarini (3 vs 2). Therefore, Krueger played 5 games more than Collarini. The American scored 46 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, The Argentine recorded 28 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Krueger | Collarini |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 5 |
| 1st in | 59/87 | 42/70 |
| %1st in | 68% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 46/59 | 28/42 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 13/28 | 17/28 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 61% |
Krueger blasted 8 aces . Collarini blasted 5 aces . Krueger won 78% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Collarini won 67% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Krueger | Collarini |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 50% | 44% |
| Conceded | 2 | 6 |
| Saved | 1 | 3 |
| % Saved | 50% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Krueger broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The American surrendered his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Argentine broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Andrea conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Krueger | |||
| Q1 Rodriguez | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 5-7 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 96-78 | 96-78 | |
| Total points | 174 | 174 | |
| Winners | 46 | 46 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 59/87 | 59/87 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 46/59 | 46/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/28 | 13/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Collarini | |||
| Q1 Choinski | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 79-70 | 79-70 | |
| Total points | 149 | 149 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 42/70 | 42/70 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 28/42 | 28/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/28 | 17/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores – U.S. Open
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones (3-6 7-66 7-612) – See score progression
- Yibing WuWu – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Patrick KypsonKypson (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Alibek KachmazovKachmazov (6-1 4-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Garrett JohnsJohns – Colton SmithSmith (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Jerome KymKym – Carlos TabernerTaberner (7-62 6-1) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna (6-3 5-7 6-1) – See score progression
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Justin EngelEngel (3-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Alexander BlockxBlockx – Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – George LoffhagenLoffhagen (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Hady HabibHabib (4-6 7-67 7-5) – See score progression
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (6-73 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera (6-2 7-63) – See score progression
- Daniel Merida AguilarMerida Aguilar – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (1-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Luca Van AsscheVan Assche – Dusan LajovicLajovic (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Jack KennedyKennedy (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Zachary SvajdaSvajda – August HolmgrenHolmgren (6-2 7-61) – See score progression
- Rei SakamotoSakamoto – Tyler ZinkZink (4-6 7-5 7-68) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Alex BarrenaBarrena (6-4 6-74 6-3) – See score progression
- Michael ZhengZheng – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Martin DammDamm – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Calvin HemeryHemery (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Alex BoltBolt (5-7 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Henrique RochaRocha – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (6-4 6-71 6-4) – See score progression
- Ignacio BuseBuse – Lukas NeumayerNeumayer (7-62 6-75 6-1) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Jurij RodionovRodionov (6-2 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Jaime FariaFaria – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (3-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Arthur BouquierBouquier (7-5 7-62) – See score progression
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Benjamin WillwerthWillwerth (6-75 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Leandro RiediRiedi – Luka PavlovicPavlovic (6-2 7-63) – See score progression
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Liam DraxlDraxl (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – Elias YmerYmer (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Omar JasikaJasika (6-73 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Lukas KleinKlein (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Andres MartinMartin – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (3-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Daniel EvansEvans (6-4 3-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – Johannus MondayMonday (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Pablo Llamas RuizLlamas Ruiz – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (1-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Federico CinaCina – Dominic StrickerStricker (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (6-3 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Clement TaburTabur (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – Borna GojoGojo (7-62 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (6-3 6-72 6-4) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Christopher EubanksEubanks (7-5 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez – Sascha Gueymard WayenburgGueymard Wayenburg (6-72 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Facundo BagnisBagnis (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Chris RodeschRodesch (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Jack SatterfieldSatterfield (7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (6-3 5-7 7-5) – See score progression
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Clement ChidekhChidekh (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Mark LajalLajal (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Matteo GiganteGigante – Edas ButvilasButvilas (3-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Guy Den OudenDen Ouden (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (7-66 5-7 6-1) – See score progression
- Cristian GarinGarin – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Vilius GaubasGaubas (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (6-3 6-72 6-4) – See score progression
- Dino PrizmicPrizmic – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (7-67 6-1) – See score progression
- Fajing SunSun – Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon (3-6 7-65 4-1 ret.) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- James DuckworthDuckworth – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernard TomicTomic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Andrea CollariniCollarini (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Jan-Lennard StruffStruff (3-3) – H2H and prediction
- Christian GarinGarin – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Fajing SunSun – Lloyd HarrisHarris (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zsombor PirosPiros – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – Garrett JohnsJohns (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Harold MayotMayot (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (0-0) – H2H and prediction