Petra Marcinko and Alina Charaeva will square off in the qualifications of the U.S. Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 2:00 pm on Court 6. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Petra Marcinko who should win in 2 sets.
Petra Marcinko -> 1.36
Alina Charaeva -> 3.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Petra Marcinko vs. Alina Charaeva
There is no head to head record between Petra Marcinko and Alina Charaeva since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Petra Marcinko
37 - 18win/loss
116
114
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 53-24 | 24-11 | 18-7 | 11-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 21-17 | 3-2 | 11-11 | 7-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-18 | 12-7 | 20-10 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-13 | 2-2 | 25-7 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-6 | 6-3 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 115 (career-high), the Croatian reached the qualifications after beating Xinyu Gao 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, Marcinko had a good straight sets win against Gao (6-2 6-1). During the match, Marcinko scored 60 points vs Gao’s 30. The Croatian was quite aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Regarding the service games, Marcinko scored just 1 ace during the encounter and she committed only 1 double fault. Petra Marcinko lost the serve once and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Marcinko put 60% of her first serves in, winning 70% (19/27) of the points behind her 1st serve and 72% (13/18) on the 2nd serve. The Croatian broke Gao 5 times after converting 63% of her break points (5/8).
Marcinko has a solid match record in the last 5 years having won 66% of her matches (138-71). 11-5 on hard in 2025. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Marcinko has an aggregate34-19 win-loss record in the last 5 years on hard.
Her best result of the current season was winning the title the Rome where she defeated Oksana Selekhmeteva in the final 6-3 4-6 6-3 and the W100 Landisville where she defeated Janice Tjen in the final 7-6(4) 3-6 6-4.
Petra has a composed 37-17 win-loss record in 2025, 11-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Alina Charaeva
27 - 18win/loss
160
142
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 36-25 | 7-8 | 25-11 | 3-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 38-23 | 20-9 | 8-8 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-17 | 31-11 | 5-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 13-4 | 2-3 | 10-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-19 | 16-8 | 4-7 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 196, Alina reached the qualifications after beating Monika Ekstrand 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Alina had a good straight sets win against Ekstrand (6-3 6-4). During the match Charaeva scored 68 points vs Ekstrand’s 53. The Russian was extremely aggressive to blast 22 winners.
About the serving games, Charaeva blasted 4 aces and she committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Alina Charaeva was very effective on serve to win 73% (22/30) of her 1st serve and 52% (15/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve twice. Charaeva broke Ekstrand 5 times after converting 45% of her break points (5/11).
Her best result of the current season was winning the title the W75 Kursumlijska Banja where she beat Teodora Kostovic in the final 6-4 7-6(5).
The Russian has a composed 26-18 win-loss record in 2025, 4-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Marcinko | Charaeva |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 19 |
| Pts | 60-30 | 68-53 |
| Total Points | 90 | 121 |
| Winners | 19 | 22 |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% |
Both Marcinko and Charaeva played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Marcinko and Charaeva have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Marcinko played 4 games less than Charaeva. Petra scored 19 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Charaeva blasted 22 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Marcinko | Charaeva |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 4 |
| 1st in | 27/45 | 30/59 |
| %1st in | 60% | 51% |
| 1st pts | 19/27 | 22/30 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 13/18 | 15/29 |
| %2nd pts | 72% | 52% |
Marcinko scored 1 ace . Charaeva also blasted 4 aces . Marcinko won 70% points on her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 72% of the points. On the other side, Charaeva won 73% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Marcinko | Charaeva |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/11 |
| % Converted | 63% | 45% |
| Conceded | 3 | 6 |
| Saved | 2 | 4 |
| % Saved | 67% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
The Croatian broke her opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. The Croatian lost her serve once and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded. The Russian broke her opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Alina conceded her serve twice and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded.
| Marcinko | |||
| Q1 Gao | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 60-30 | 60-30 | |
| Total points | 90 | 90 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 27/45 | 27/45 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 19/27 | 19/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/18 | 13/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 72% | 72% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Charaeva | |||
| Q1 Ekstrand | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 68-53 | 68-53 | |
| Total points | 121 | 121 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 30/59 | 30/59 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 22/30 | 22/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/29 | 15/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores – U.S. Open
- Arianne HartonoHartono – Ana Sofia SanchezSofia Sanchez (2-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Guiomar Zuleta De RealesZuleta De Reales – Tiantsoa Rakotomanga RajaonahRakotomanga Rajaonah (6-2 7-64) – See score progression
- Linda KlimovicovaKlimovicova – Alina KorneevaKorneeva (7-64 6-72 6-4) – See score progression
- Sachia VickeryVickery – Anastasiia SobolievaSobolieva (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Shuai ZhangZhang – Mary StoianaStoiana (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Harriet DartDart – Anca Alexia TodoniAlexia Todoni (7-5 6-73 7-66) – See score progression
- Darja VidmanovaVidmanova – Maya IyengarIyengar (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Leyre Romero GormazRomero Gormaz – Celine NaefNaef (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Jule NiemeierNiemeier – Daria SavilleSaville (6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Francesca JonesJones – Viktoria HruncakovaHruncakova (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Justina MikulskyteMikulskyte – Kyoka OkamuraOkamura (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Ayana AkliAkli – Eva VedderVedder (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Aoi ItoIto – Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam (6-4 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Viktoriya TomovaTomova – Irene BurilloBurillo (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Iryna ShymanovichShymanovich – Sinja KrausKraus (6-3 2-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Oksana SelekhmetevaSelekhmeteva – Julia RieraRiera (2-6 6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Ella SeidelSeidel – Kathinka Von DeichmannVon Deichmann (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Jessika PonchetPonchet – Elizabeth MandlikMandlik (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Olivia GadeckiGadecki – Anouk KoevermansKoevermans (3-6 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Veronika ErjavecErjavec – Maria TimofeevaTimofeeva (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Priscilla HonHon – Nuria BrancaccioBrancaccio (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Janice TjenTjen – Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Carol ZhaoZhao – Maria Lourdes CarleLourdes Carle (7-68 6-2) – See score progression
- Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini – Vitalia DiatchenkoDiatchenko (7-66 6-2) – See score progression
- Ekaterine GorgodzeGorgodze – Heather WatsonWatson (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Destanee AiavaAiava – Sara BejlekBejlek (6-4 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Sijia WeiWei – Berfu CengizCengiz (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Hanne VandewinkelVandewinkel – Marina StakusicStakusic (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Maja ChwalinskaChwalinska – Georgia PedonePedone (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Darja SemenistajaSemenistaja – Andrea Lazaro GarciaLazaro Garcia (2-6 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Cadence BraceBrace – Nao HibinoHibino (2-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Lizette CabreraCabrera – Oleksandra OliynykovaOliynykova (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Petra MarcinkoMarcinko – Xinyu GaoGao (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Madison BrengleBrengle (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Ena ShibaharaShibahara – Kayla DayDay (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Mai HontamaHontama – Kristina PenickovaPenickova (6-0 4-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Tereza ValentovaValentova – Mona BarthelBarthel (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Rebecca MarinoMarino – Lanlana TararudeeTararudee (6-3 2-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Tara WuerthWuerth – Arina RodionovaRodionova (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Elena PridankinaPridankina – Barbora PalicovaPalicova (5-7 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Claire LiuLiu – Katarzyna KawaKawa (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Maddison InglisInglis – Storm HunterHunter (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jodie Anna BurrageAnna Burrage – Patricia Maria TigMaria Tig (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Kristina DmitrukDmitruk – Kaja JuvanJuvan (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Dalma GalfiGalfi – Akasha UrhoboUrhobo (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Jana FettFett – Joanna GarlandGarland (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Astra SharmaSharma – Lola RadivojevicRadivojevic (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Arantxa RusRus – Carlota Martinez CirezMartinez Cirez (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Tatiana ProzorovaProzorova – Martina TrevisanTrevisan (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Alina CharaevaCharaeva – Monika EkstrandEkstrand (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Amelia HonerHoner – Whitney OsuigweOsuigwe (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Tessah AndrianjafitrimoAndrianjafitrimo – Polona HercogHercog (5-7 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Panna UdvardyUdvardy – Paula OrmaecheaOrmaechea (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Victoria Jimenez KasintsevaJimenez Kasintseva – Alexis NguyenNguyen (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Dominika SalkovaSalkova – Julia GrabherGrabher (7-5 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Emerson JonesJones – Bernarda PeraPera (6-1 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Simona WaltertWaltert – Daria SnigurSnigur (4-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Sofia CostoulasCostoulas (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Xiyu WangWang – Carson BranstineBranstine (3-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Manon LeonardLeonard – Sada NahimanaNahimana (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Laura PigossiPigossi – Tamara ZidansekZidansek (5-7 7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Hina InoueInoue – Lauren DavisDavis (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Petra MarticMartic – Linda FruhvirtovaFruhvirtova (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Fiona CrawleyCrawley – Louisa ChiricoChirico (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Francesca JonesJones – Ekaterine GorgodzeGorgodze (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arianne HartonoHartono – Olivia GadeckiGadecki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jodie Anna BurrageAnna Burrage – Arantxa RusRus (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maja ChwalinskaChwalinska – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalma GalfiGalfi – Fiona CrawleyCrawley (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manon LeonardLeonard – Panna UdvardyUdvardy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktoriya TomovaTomova – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jule NiemeierNiemeier – Priscilla HonHon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tessah AndrianjafitrimoAndrianjafitrimo – Jana FettFett (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Destanee AiavaAiava – Justina MikulskyteMikulskyte (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sachia VickeryVickery – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shuai ZhangZhang – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sijia WeiWei – Leyre Romero GormazRomero Gormaz (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Astra SharmaSharma – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Petra MarticMartic – Xiyu WangWang (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Rebecca MarinoMarino (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Carol ZhaoZhao – Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hina InoueInoue – Simona WaltertWaltert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Claire LiuLiu – Maddison InglisInglis (0-0) – H2H and prediction