
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva and Astra Sharma will square off in the qualifications of the U.S. Open for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:00 pm on Court 5. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva is the pick to win this match.
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva -> 1.88
Astra Sharma -> 1.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva vs. Astra Sharma
This will be the 3rd time that Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva and Astra Sharma square off. The head to head is 2-0 for Sharma (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on hard.
The last time that they locked horns, Sharma won 6-1 3-6 7-5 in the 1st round in the W60 Montpellier back in 2023.
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva

26 - 20win/loss
110
107
LLLLWLLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 39-31 | 20-13 | 15-12 | 3-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 45-28 | 9-9 | 34-15 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-21 | 9-8 | 12-8 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-20 | 20-10 | 8-8 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-23 | 5-5 | 26-16 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 132, Victoria reached the qualifications after beating Alexis Nguyen 6-2 7-5.
In the qualifications, Jimenez Kasintseva had a good straight sets win against Nguyen (6-2 7-5). During the match, Jimenez Kasintseva scored 76 points vs Nguyen’s 59. Jimenez Kasintseva was very aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Jimenez Kasintseva struck 2 aces and she committed only 7 double faults. Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva lost the serve twice and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Jimenez Kasintseva put 69% of her first serves in, winning 71% (30/42) of the points behind her 1st serve and 47% (9/19) on the 2nd serve. Victoria broke Nguyen 5 times after converting 38% of her break points (5/13).
Jimenez Kasintseva has a winning match record in the last 6 years having won 58% of her matches (159-116). 6-3 on hard in 2025. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Jimenez Kasintseva has a composed49-35 record in the last 6 years on hard.
The Andorran’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Antalya and the Makarska.
Victoria has a composed 25-20 win-loss record in 2025, 6-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Astra Sharma

34 - 23win/loss
161
84
LLLLLWLLLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 34-27 | 10-14 | 24-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 16-28 | 4-8 | 9-17 | 3-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-20 | 16-8 | 25-11 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-26 | 11-18 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-21 | 11-9 | 11-7 | 1-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 144, the Australian got to the qualifications after beating Lola Radivojevic 7-5 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Radivojevic (7-5 6-4). During the match Sharma scored 79 points vs Radivojevic’s 66. The Australian was pretty aggressive to blast 43 winners.
About the serving games, Sharma made 3 aces and she was pretty solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Astra Sharma lost the serve once and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Sharma put 74% of her first serves in, winning 77% (43/56) of the points behind her 1st serve and 40% (8/20) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Radivojevic 3 times after converting 50% of her break points (3/6).
Her best result of the year was conquering the title the W100 Bonita Springs where she defeated Whitney Osuigwe in the final 6-2 6-2.
Astra has a composed 34-22 win-loss record in 2025, 10-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the U.S. Open
Previously, her best result was reaching the 1st round in 2019, 2020 and 2021. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jimenez Kasintseva | Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 22 |
| Pts | 76-59 | 79-66 |
| Total Points | 135 | 145 |
| Winners | 30 | 43 |
| %Winners | 39% | 54% |
Both Jimenez Kasintseva and Sharma played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Jimenez Kasintseva and Sharma have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Jimenez Kasintseva played 2 games less than Sharma. Victoria scored 30 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian blasted 43 winners (54%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jimenez Kasintseva | Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 3 |
| 1st in | 42/61 | 56/76 |
| %1st in | 69% | 74% |
| 1st pts | 30/42 | 43/56 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | 8/20 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 40% |
Jimenez Kasintseva struck 2 aces . Sharma fired 3 aces . Jimenez Kasintseva won 71% points behind her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Sharma won 77% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 40% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jimenez Kasintseva | Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/13 | 3/6 |
| % Converted | 38% | 50% |
| Conceded | 5 | 6 |
| Saved | 3 | 5 |
| % Saved | 60% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Victoria broke her opponent 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Andorran dropped her serve twice and she saved 60% of the break points that she conceded. Astra broke her opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Australian conceded her serve once and she saved 83% of the break points that she conceded.
| Jimenez Kasintseva | |||
| Q1 Nguyen |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 76-59 | 76-59 | |
| Total points | 135 | 135 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 42/61 | 42/61 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 30/42 | 30/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | 9/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Sharma | |||
| Q1 Radivojevic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 79-66 | 79-66 | |
| Total points | 145 | 145 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 54% | 54% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 56/76 | 56/76 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 43/56 | 43/56 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/20 | 8/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 40% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWLLWWW
LLLLLWLLLW Tennis Scores – U.S. Open
- Sijia WeiWei – Berfu CengizCengiz (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Hanne VandewinkelVandewinkel – Marina StakusicStakusic (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Maja ChwalinskaChwalinska – Georgia PedonePedone (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Darja SemenistajaSemenistaja – Andrea Lazaro GarciaLazaro Garcia (2-6 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Veronika ErjavecErjavec – Maria TimofeevaTimofeeva (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Jule NiemeierNiemeier – Daria SavilleSaville (6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Francesca JonesJones – Viktoria HruncakovaHruncakova (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Justina MikulskyteMikulskyte – Kyoka OkamuraOkamura (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Harriet DartDart – Anca Alexia TodoniAlexia Todoni (7-5 6-73 7-66) – See score progression
- Aoi ItoIto – Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam (6-4 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Shuai ZhangZhang – Mary StoianaStoiana (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Iryna ShymanovichShymanovich – Sinja KrausKraus (6-3 2-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Ella SeidelSeidel – Kathinka Von DeichmannVon Deichmann (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Darja VidmanovaVidmanova – Maya IyengarIyengar (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Olivia GadeckiGadecki – Anouk KoevermansKoevermans (3-6 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Lizette CabreraCabrera – Oleksandra OliynykovaOliynykova (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Priscilla HonHon – Nuria BrancaccioBrancaccio (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Janice TjenTjen – Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Carol ZhaoZhao – Maria Lourdes CarleLourdes Carle (7-68 6-2) – See score progression
- Ayana AkliAkli – Eva VedderVedder (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Viktoriya TomovaTomova – Irene BurilloBurillo (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Destanee AiavaAiava – Sara BejlekBejlek (6-4 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Oksana SelekhmetevaSelekhmeteva – Julia RieraRiera (2-6 6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Arianne HartonoHartono – Ana Sofia SanchezSofia Sanchez (2-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Cadence BraceBrace – Nao HibinoHibino (2-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Jessika PonchetPonchet – Elizabeth MandlikMandlik (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Leyre Romero GormazRomero Gormaz – Celine NaefNaef (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Guiomar Zuleta De RealesZuleta De Reales – Tiantsoa Rakotomanga RajaonahRakotomanga Rajaonah (6-2 7-64) – See score progression
- Linda KlimovicovaKlimovicova – Alina KorneevaKorneeva (7-64 6-72 6-4) – See score progression
- Sachia VickeryVickery – Anastasiia SobolievaSobolieva (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini – Vitalia DiatchenkoDiatchenko (7-66 6-2) – See score progression
- Ekaterine GorgodzeGorgodze – Heather WatsonWatson (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Tereza ValentovaValentova – Mona BarthelBarthel (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Tara WuerthWuerth – Arina RodionovaRodionova (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Arantxa RusRus – Carlota Martinez CirezMartinez Cirez (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Alina CharaevaCharaeva – Monika EkstrandEkstrand (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Tessah AndrianjafitrimoAndrianjafitrimo – Polona HercogHercog (5-7 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Panna UdvardyUdvardy – Paula OrmaecheaOrmaechea (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Victoria Jimenez KasintsevaJimenez Kasintseva – Alexis NguyenNguyen (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Kristina DmitrukDmitruk – Kaja JuvanJuvan (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Petra MarcinkoMarcinko – Xinyu GaoGao (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Ena ShibaharaShibahara – Kayla DayDay (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Mai HontamaHontama – Kristina PenickovaPenickova (6-0 4-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Rebecca MarinoMarino – Lanlana TararudeeTararudee (6-3 2-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Sofia CostoulasCostoulas (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Tatiana ProzorovaProzorova – Martina TrevisanTrevisan (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Manon LeonardLeonard – Sada NahimanaNahimana (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Amelia HonerHoner – Whitney OsuigweOsuigwe (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Hina InoueInoue – Lauren DavisDavis (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Petra MarticMartic – Linda FruhvirtovaFruhvirtova (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Dominika SalkovaSalkova – Julia GrabherGrabher (7-5 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Dalma GalfiGalfi – Akasha UrhoboUrhobo (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Simona WaltertWaltert – Daria SnigurSnigur (4-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Jana FettFett – Joanna GarlandGarland (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Astra SharmaSharma – Lola RadivojevicRadivojevic (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Elena PridankinaPridankina – Barbora PalicovaPalicova (5-7 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Xiyu WangWang – Carson BranstineBranstine (3-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Claire LiuLiu – Katarzyna KawaKawa (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Laura PigossiPigossi – Tamara ZidansekZidansek (5-7 7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Maddison InglisInglis – Storm HunterHunter (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Fiona CrawleyCrawley – Louisa ChiricoChirico (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Jodie Anna BurrageAnna Burrage – Patricia Maria TigMaria Tig (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Emerson JonesJones – Bernarda PeraPera (6-1 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Madison BrengleBrengle (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Francesca JonesJones – Ekaterine GorgodzeGorgodze (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arianne HartonoHartono – Olivia GadeckiGadecki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jodie Anna BurrageAnna Burrage – Arantxa RusRus (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maja ChwalinskaChwalinska – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalma GalfiGalfi – Fiona CrawleyCrawley (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manon LeonardLeonard – Panna UdvardyUdvardy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktoriya TomovaTomova – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jule NiemeierNiemeier – Priscilla HonHon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tessah AndrianjafitrimoAndrianjafitrimo – Jana FettFett (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Destanee AiavaAiava – Justina MikulskyteMikulskyte (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sachia VickeryVickery – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shuai ZhangZhang – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sijia WeiWei – Leyre Romero GormazRomero Gormaz (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Astra SharmaSharma – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Petra MarticMartic – Xiyu WangWang (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Rebecca MarinoMarino (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Carol ZhaoZhao – Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hina InoueInoue – Simona WaltertWaltert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Claire LiuLiu – Maddison InglisInglis (0-0) – H2H and prediction








