Xinyu Wang and Talia Gibson will fight against each other in the 2^nd round of the Tennis in the Land for the 2^nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 11:00 am on STADIUM. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Xinyu Wang who should win in 2 sets.

As per the initial odds, Xinyu Wang is the pick to win this match.
Xinyu Wang -> 1.4
Talia Gibson -> 2.95

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Xinyu Wang vs. Talia Gibson

This will be the 2^nd time that Xinyu Wang and Talia Gibson play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Wang (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on hard.

The last time that they locked horns, Wang won 3-6 7-6(5) 7-5 in the qualifications in Berlin back in June 2025.

Xinyu Wang

Ranked no. 37, the Chinese got to the 2^nd round after defeating Suzan Lamens 6-2 6-7(3) 6-2.

In the 1^st round, The Chinese defeated Lamens (6-2 6-7³ 6-2). During the match, Wang scored 100 points vs Lamens’s 81. Xinyu was exceptionally aggressive to blast 37 winners.

Talking about the service games, Wang struck 5 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Xinyu Wang lost the serve 3 times and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Wang put 60% of her first serves in, winning 71% (37/52) of the points behind her 1st serve and 49% (17/35) on the 2nd serve. Xinyu broke Lamens 7 times after converting 58% of her break points (7/12).

Wang has winning record in the last 10 years having won 59% of her matches (253-175). 9-9 on hard in 2025. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this competition, Wang has an overall 151-109 win-loss record in the last years on hard.

Wang’s best result of the year was getting to the final in Berlin.

Xinyu has a compiled 22-18 win-loss record in 2025, 9-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in Cleveland

Talia Gibson

Ranked no. 107 (career-high), Talia got to the 2^nd round after defeating Vivian Wolff 6-2 6-1, Anna Sinclair Rogers 7-5 6-2 and Greetje Minnen 7-6(2) 6-4.

In the 1^st round, Gibson had a good straight sets win against Minnen (7-6² 6-4). During the match Gibson scored 78 points vs Minnen’s 67. Gibson was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.

Talking about serving, Gibson scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she committed only 3 double faults. Talia Gibson lost the serve 3 times and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Gibson put 59% of her first serves in, winning 65% (26/40) of the points behind her 1st serve and 54% (15/28) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Minnen 4 times after converting 44% of her break points (4/9).

Her best result of the year was winning the title the W50 Nantes where she defeated Francesca Curmi in the final 3-6 7-5 6-1 and the W75 Granby where she overcame Fiona Crawley in the final 6-3 6-4.

Gibson has a composed 32-19 win-loss record in 2025, 15-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in Cleveland

Gibson has never competed in this tournament before.

H2H Performance in the tournament

Matches, sets, games and points

Points	Wang	Gibson
Match played	1	3
Tot Set	3	6
Tot Games	29	58
Pts	100-81	214-158
Total Points	181	372
Winners	37	86
%Winners	37%	40%

Wang played 1 match while Gibson competed in 3 matches. Gibson started her run from the qualifications while Wang had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Xinyu Wang lost 1 set while Talia Gibson hasn’t dropped a set so far. Wang has played 3 set(s) less than Gibson (3 vs 6). Therefore, Wang played 29 games less than Gibson. Xinyu scored 37 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian struck 86 winners (40%).

Serve Performance

Serve	Wang	Gibson
Aces	5	10
Avg per match	5	3.3
1st in	52/87	113/167
%1st in	60%	68%
1st pts	37/52	86/113
%1st pts	71%	76%
2nd pts	17/35	26/54
%2nd pts	49%	48%

Wang managed to score 5 aces . Gibson scored 10 aces (3.3 per match). Wang won 71% points on her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Gibson won 76% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 48% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks	Wang	Gibson
Won	7	13
Converted	7/12	13/28
% Converted	58%	46%
Conceded	5	11
Saved	2	6
% Saved	40%	55%
Times Broken	3	5

Wang broke her opponent 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. The Chinese lost her serve 3 times and she saved 40% of the break points that she conceded. The Australian broke her opponents 13 times with a 46% conversion rate. Talia conceded her serve 5 times and she saved 55% of the break points that she conceded.

Wang
	R1 Lamens	Total
Score	6-2 6-73 6-2
Tot Set	3	3
Tot Games	29	29
pts	100-81	100-81
Total points	181	181
Winners	37	37
%Winners	37%	37%
SERVE
Aces	5	5
Double Faults	4	4
1st in	52/87	52/87
% 1st in	60%	60%
1st pts	37/52	37/52
% 1st pts	71%	71%
2nd pts	17/35	17/35
% 2nd pts	49%	49%
Breaks
Won	7	7
Converted	7/12	7/12
Converted %	58%	58%
Conceded	5	5
Saved	2/5	2
Saved %	40%	40%
Times Broken	3	3

Gibson
	Q1 Wolff	Q3 Sinclair	R1 Minnen	Total
Score	6-2 6-1	7-5 6-2	7-62 6-4
Tot Set	2	2	2	6
Tot Games	15	20	23	58
pts	58-35	78-56	78-67	214-158
Total points	93	134	145	372
Winners	31	29	26	86
%Winners	53%	37%	33%	40%
SERVE
Aces	3	6	1	10
Double Faults	2	4	3	9
1st in	37/47	36/52	40/68	113/167
% 1st in	79%	69%	59%	68%
1st pts	31/37	29/36	26/40	86/113
% 1st pts	84%	81%	65%	76%
2nd pts	4/10	7/16	15/28	26/54
% 2nd pts	40%	44%	54%	48%
Breaks
Won	4	5	4	13
Converted	4/7	5/12	4/9	13/28
Converted %	57%	42%	44%	46%
Conceded	1	3	7	11
Saved	1/1	1/3	4/7	6
Saved %	100%	33%	57%	190%
Times Broken	0	2	3	5

Tennis Scores in Cleveland

• Liudmila SamsonovaSamsonova – Yafan WangWang (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Sorana CirsteaCirstea – Jil TeichmannTeichmann (6-1 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Eva LysLys – Polina KudermetovaKudermetova (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Anastasia ZakharovaZakharova – Hailey BaptisteBaptiste (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (6-1 6-7⁹ 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Joao MenezesMenezes – Alexander SarkissianSarkissian (6-3 6-7⁵ 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Raymond SarmientoSarmiento (6-4 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Evan SongSong (6-7⁷ 7-6⁴ 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Zhe LiLi (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Dennis NovikovNovikov – Donald YoungYoung (7-6⁶ 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Dudi SelaSela – Matias Franco DescotteFranco Descotte (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Carlos Gomez-HerreraGomez-Herrera – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Tim SmyczekSmyczek – Zsombor PirosPiros (6-3 4-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Duckhee LeeLee – John McnallyMcnally (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Ji Sung NamSung Nam – Jeff WolfWolf (6-4 3-6 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Alejandro GonzalezGonzalez – Michael MmohMmoh (6-2 1-2 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Daniel NguyenNguyen (4-6 6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Collin AltamiranoAltamirano – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (6-4 3-6 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
• Emilio GomezGomez – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (6-1 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings

Upcoming matches in the draw

• Ann LiLi – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Katie BoulterBoulter – Viktorija GolubicGolubic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
• Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova – Sorana CirsteaCirstea (1-0) – H2H and prediction
• Eva LysLys – Anastasia ZakharovaZakharova (1-1) – H2H and prediction