Lukas Klein and James McCabe will face off in the 2nd round of the Sumter Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:30 pm on GRANDSTAND. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Lukas Klein who should win in 3 sets.
Lukas Klein -> 1.55
James McCabe -> 2.33
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Lukas Klein vs. James McCabe
There is no head to head record between Lukas Klein and James McCabe since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Lukas Klein
28 - 18win/loss
140
109
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 30-27 | 6-9 | 17-8 | 5-9 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-24 | 16-10 | 9-7 | 5-5 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-29 | 9-8 | 15-12 | 11-6 | 1-2 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 44-22 | 5-0 | 27-17 | 8-3 | 3-1 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 28-22 | 0-2 | 23-17 | 2-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 122, Klein reached the 2nd round after defeating Ryan Seggerman 6-4 ret..
In the 1st round against Seggerman, Klein had a free pass after Seggerman retired on a 6-4 . scoreline.
Klein has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (347-213). 4-5 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Klein has a compiled 102-51 match record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the year was winning the title the San Marino Challenger where he beat Dino Prizmic in the final 6-3 6-4 and the Zug Challenger where he overcame Harold Mayot in the final 6-2 6-7(4) 6-4.
Lukas has a compiled 27-18 win-loss record in 2025, 4-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sumter Challenger
The Slovakian has never competed in this tournament before.
James McCabe
22 - 24win/loss
196
164
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 31-34 | 21-26 | 0-2 | 3-1 | 7-5 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 55-35 | 47-28 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-27 | 24-14 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-27 | 30-19 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-5 | 17-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 167, the Australian got to the 2nd round after beating Jacob Fearnley 3-6 7-5 ret..
In the 1st round against Fearnley, McCabe had a free pass after Fearnley retired on a 3-6 7-5 . scoreline.
The Australian’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the Bengaluru Challenger.
McCabe has a compiled 22-23 win-loss record in 2025, 15-16 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Klein | McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 10 | 21 |
| Pts | 36-31 | 66-67 |
| Total Points | 67 | 133 |
| Winners | 17 | 27 |
| %Winners | 47% | 41% |
Both Klein and McCabe played 1 match. At the moment, James McCabe conceded 1 set while Lukas Klein hasn’t dropped a set so far. Klein has played 1 set(s) less than McCabe (2 vs 3). Therefore, Klein played 11 games less than McCabe. The Slovakian scored 17 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian bagged 27 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Klein | McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 4 |
| 1st in | 22/33 | 36/64 |
| %1st in | 67% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 17/22 | 27/36 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 6/11 | 15/28 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 54% |
Klein bagged 3 aces . McCabe scored 4 aces . Klein won 77% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, McCabe won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Klein | McCabe |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 1 | 2 |
| Converted | 1/4 | 2/4 |
| % Converted | 25% | 50% |
| Conceded | 4 | 8 |
| Saved | 4 | 6 |
| % Saved | 100% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Klein broke his opponent once with a 25% conversion rate. Lukas pretty solid on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 4 break points. McCabe broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Klein | |||
| R1 Seggerman | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 1 | 1 | |
| Tot Games | 10 | 10 | |
| pts | 36-31 | 36-31 | |
| Total points | 67 | 67 | |
| Winners | 17 | 17 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 22/33 | 22/33 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 17/22 | 17/22 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/4 | 1/4 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| McCabe | |||
| R1 Fearnley | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 7-5 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 66-67 | 66-67 | |
| Total points | 133 | 133 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 36/64 | 36/64 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 27/36 | 27/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/28 | 15/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores in Sumter Challenger
- Karl PolingPoling – Daniel EvansEvans (1-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Mark LajalLajal – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (1-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Ryan SeggermanSeggerman (6-4 ret.) – See score progression
- Henrique RochaRocha – Martin DammDamm (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- James McCabeMcCabe – Jacob FearnleyFearnley (3-6 7-5 ret.) – See score progression
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Darwin BlanchBlanch (7-5 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Martin LandaluceLandaluce (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Kaylan BigunBigun – Rei SakamotoSakamoto (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Alex RybakovRybakov (7-5 7-62) – See score progression
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – Christopher EubanksEubanks (6-3 3-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Jaime FariaFaria – Hady HabibHabib (6-79 6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Henrique RochaRocha – Martin DammDamm (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Karl PolingPoling – Daniel EvansEvans (1-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Martin LandaluceLandaluce (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Murphy CassoneCassone – Darwin BlanchBlanch (7-5 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zizou BergsBergs – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Filip MisolicMisolic (0-0) – H2H and prediction