Nerman Fatic and Sebastian Gima will clash against each other in the quarter of the Sofia 1 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nerman Fatic who should win in 2 sets.

As per the initial odds, Nerman Fatic is the pick to win this match.
Nerman Fatic -> 1.3
Sebastian Gima -> 3.28

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Nerman Fatic vs. Sebastian Gima

This will be the 2nd time that Nerman Fatic and Sebastian Gima play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Fatic (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.

The last time that they played each other, Fatic won 6-4 6-2 in the quarter in M15 Antalya back in 2020.

Nerman Fatic

Nerman Fatic

37 - 11win/loss

Clay
37-11
Rank
212
High
191
LWLLWLWWLW
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2025 47-18 2-1 44-15 1-2 0-0 0-0
2024 23-26 3-5 19-20 1-0 0-1 0-0
2023 37-28 0-1 35-25 1-1 0-0 1-1
2022 34-27 0-1 31-19 2-6 0-0 1-1
2021 37-26 1-1 30-22 6-3 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 247, Fatic reached the quarter after beating Kilian Feldbausch 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2

and Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi 6-3 6-2.

In the 2nd round, Nerman had a good straight sets win against Emanuel Ambrogi (6-3 6-2). During the match, Fatic scored 68 points vs Emanuel Ambrogi’s 51. Nerman was exceptionally aggressive to blast 34 winners.

Talking about the service games, Fatic recorded 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Nerman Fatic lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Fatic put 69% of his first serves in, winning 71% (34/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (10/22) on the 2nd serve. Nerman broke Emanuel Ambrogi 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).

Overall Performance in this tournament

Fatic has surrendered 1 set in this event to conquer 54% of the points he played.

Fatic has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (323-201). 37-11 on clay in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Fatic has a composed 286-162 record in the last years on clay.

Nerman’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Antalya,M15 Porec,M15 Dubrovnik,the Skopje Challenger and the Perugia Challenger.

Fatic has an overall 37-11 win-loss record in 2025, 37-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Sofia 1 Challenger

Fatic has never competed in this tournament before.

Sofia 1 Challenger
Fatic's Record

Sebastian Gima

Sebastian Gima

32 - 23win/loss

Hard
6-4
I Hard
0-0
Clay
26-19
Rank
529
High
436
LLWWWLLWLW
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2025 42-35 9-5 33-30 0-0 0-0 0-0
2024 34-33 3-5 31-28 0-0 0-0 0-0
2023 57-35 15-8 41-25 1-2 0-0 0-0
2022 48-30 25-11 23-18 0-1 0-0 0-0
2021 31-24 1-3 28-20 2-1 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 622, Gima got to the quarter after beating Yanaki Milev 6-3 6-3, Thomas Faurel 6-1 6-1, Franco Roncadelli 6-1 3-6 6-2 and Daniel Rincon 6-4 6-4.

In the 2nd round, The Romanian had a good straight sets win against Rincon (6-4 6-4). During the match Gima scored 72 points vs Rincon’s 65. Sebastian was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.

About the serving games, Gima scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Sebastian Gima lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Gima put 61% of his first serves in, winning 64% (28/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (12/28) on the 2nd serve. The Romanian broke Rincon 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).

Overall Performance in this tournament

The Romanian started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.

Gima’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Palm Coast and M15 Ljubljana.

Gima has a composed 32-23 win-loss record in 2025, 26-19 on clay (See FULL STATS).

Sofia 1 Challenger
Gima's Record

H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)

N.Fatic
S.Gima
3h:54
3h:54
Time on court​
5h:43
5h:43
1h:31
1h:31
Last match​
1h:38
1h:38
2
2
Match played
!
4
4
48
48
Games Played​
76
76
5
5
Set played​​
9
9
174
174
Total points​
275
275
87
87
Avg point​
68.8
68.8
74
74
Winners
101
101
37
37
Avg Winners​
25.3
25.3
43%
43%
Ratio winners
37%
37%
-- Serve --
7
7
Aces
11
11
3.5
3.5
Avg Aces
2.8
2.8
5
5
Double Faults
9
9
2.5
2.5
Avg Double Faults
2.3
2.3
74/103
74/103
1st won total​
101/151
101/151
!
72%
72%
1st won %
67%
67%
34/66
34/66
2nd won total​
58/102
58/102
52%
52%
2nd won %
57%
57%
-- Break Points --
9/19
9/19
BP won
19/38
19/38
4.5/9.5
4.5/9.5
Avg BP won
4.8/9.5
4.8/9.5
47%
47%
Won
50%
50%
16
16
Conceded
19
19
8
8
Avg Conceded
4.8
4.8
3
3
Broken
6
6
1.5
1.5
Avg Broken
1.5
1.5
13
13
Saved
13
13

Matches, sets, games and points

Points Fatic Gima
Match played 2 4
Tot Set 5 9
Tot Games 48 76
Pts 174-147 275-216
Total Points 321 491
Winners 74 101
%Winners 43% 37%

Fatic played 2 matches while Gima competed in 4 matches. Gima started his run from the qualifications while Fatic had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Nerman Fatic lost 1 set, while Sebastian Gima dropped 1 set. Fatic has played 4 set(s) less than Gima (5 vs 9). Therefore, Fatic played 28 games less than Gima. Fatic scored 74 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The Romanian struck 101 winners (37%).

Serve Performance

Serve Fatic Gima
Aces 7 11
Avg per match 3.5 2.8
1st in 103/169 151/253
%1st in 61% 60%
1st pts 74/103 101/151
%1st pts 72% 67%
2nd pts 34/66 58/102
%2nd pts 52% 57%

Fatic scored 7 aces (3.5 per match). Gima blasted 11 aces (2.8 per match). Fatic won 72% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Gima won 67% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks Fatic Gima
Won 9 19
Converted 9/19 19/38
% Converted 47% 50%
Conceded 16 19
Saved 13 13
% Saved 81% 68%
Times Broken 3 6

Nerman broke his opponents 9 times with a 47% conversion rate. Nerman conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 81% of the break points that he conceded. The Romanian broke his opponents 19 times with a 50% conversion rate. Gima conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 68% of the break points that he conceded.

Fatic
R1
Feldbausch
R2
Emanuel
Total
Score 6-74 6-4 6-2 6-3 6-2
Tot Set 3 2 5
Tot Games 31 17 48
pts 106-96 68-51 174-147
Total points 202 119 321
Winners 40 34 74
%Winners 38% 50% 43%
SERVE
Aces 5 2 7
Double Faults 3 2 5
1st in 55/99 48/70 103/169
% 1st in 56% 69% 61%
1st pts 40/55 34/48 74/103
% 1st pts 73% 71% 72%
2nd pts 24/44 10/22 34/66
% 2nd pts 55% 45% 52%
Breaks
Won 5 4 9
Converted 5/13 4/6 9/19
Converted % 38% 67% 47%
Conceded 10 6 16
Saved 8/10 5/6 13
Saved % 80% 83% 82%
Times Broken 2 1 3
Gima
Q1
Milev
Q3
Faurel
R1
Roncadelli
R2
Rincon
Total
Score 6-3 6-3 6-1 6-1 6-1 3-6 6-2 6-4 6-4
Tot Set 2 2 3 2 9
Tot Games 18 14 24 20 76
pts 62-51 53-26 88-74 72-65 275-216
Total points 113 79 162 137 491
Winners 22 17 34 28 101
%Winners 35% 32% 39% 39% 37%
SERVE
Aces 1 6 3 1 11
Double Faults 0 0 5 4 9
1st in 39/55 21/40 47/86 44/72 151/253
% 1st in 71% 53% 55% 61% 60%
1st pts 22/39 17/21 34/47 28/44 101/151
% 1st pts 56% 81% 72% 64% 67%
2nd pts 11/16 12/19 23/39 12/28 58/102
% 2nd pts 69% 63% 59% 43% 57%
Breaks
Won 5 5 4 5 19
Converted 5/11 5/7 4/11 5/9 19/38
Converted % 45% 71% 36% 56% 50%
Conceded 5 0 9 5 19
Saved 3/5 0/0 8/9 2/5 13
Saved % 60% 89% 40% 95%
Times Broken 2 0 1 3 6

Upcoming matches in the draw

  • Nerman FaticFaticSebastian GimaGima (1-0) – H2H and prediction
  • Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien VelascoSandro KoppKopp (0-0) – H2H and prediction
  • Zdenek KolarKolarNikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (0-0) – H2H and prediction