Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Franco Agamenone who should win in 2 sets.
Franco Agamenone -> 1.24
Anas Mazdrashki -> 3.72
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Anas Mazdrashki vs. Franco Agamenone
There is no head to head record between Anas Mazdrashki and Franco Agamenone since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Anas Mazdrashki
16 - 12win/loss
896
896
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22-20 | 9-11 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Mazdrashki reached the qualifications after beating Maxime Chazal 6-3 ret..
In the qualifications against Chazal, Anas had a free pass after Chazal retired on a 6-3 . scoreline.
Mazdrashki has a winning win-loss record in the last 3 years having won 56% of his matches (19-15). 10-5 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Mazdrashki has an aggregate13-7 record in the last 3 years on clay.
Mazdrashki’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in M15 Monastir.
Mazdrashki has an aggregate 16-12 win-loss record in 2025, 10-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sofia 1 Challenger
Mazdrashki has never competed in this tournament before.
Franco Agamenone
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37-22 | 0-0 | 37-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 30-32 | 1-4 | 28-24 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-29 | 0-3 | 24-24 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-32 | 6-3 | 26-24 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 81-23 | 21-5 | 60-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 415, the Italian got to the qualifications after defeating Stefan Latinovic 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, Franco had a good straight sets win against Latinovic (6-2 6-4). During the match Agamenone scored 69 points vs Latinovic’s 54. Franco was very aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Agamenone managed to score 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Franco Agamenone lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Agamenone put 62% of his first serves in, winning 74% (29/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (11/24) on the 2nd serve. Franco broke Latinovic 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Agamenone’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Belgrade.
Franco has a composed 24-16 win-loss record in 2025, 24-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mazdrashki | Agamenone |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 9 | 18 |
| Pts | 36-29 | 69-54 |
| Total Points | 65 | 123 |
| Winners | 7 | 29 |
| %Winners | 19% | 42% |
Both Mazdrashki and Agamenone played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Mazdrashki and Agamenone have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Mazdrashki played 9 games less than Agamenone. Mazdrashki scored 7 winners (19% of the total points). On the other side, Franco made 29 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mazdrashki | Agamenone |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 2 |
| 1st in | 11/34 | 39/63 |
| %1st in | 32% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 7/11 | 29/39 |
| %1st pts | 64% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 16/23 | 11/24 |
| %2nd pts | 70% | 46% |
Mazdrashki made 3 aces . Agamenone struck 2 aces . Mazdrashki won 64% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 70% of the points. On the other side, Agamenone won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mazdrashki | Agamenone |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 1 | 4 |
| Converted | 1/6 | 4/7 |
| % Converted | 17% | 57% |
| Conceded | 1 | 4 |
| Saved | 1 | 3 |
| % Saved | 100% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The Bulgarian broke his opponent once with a 17% conversion rate. Mazdrashki had a solid display on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points. Franco broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Franco conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Mazdrashki | |||
| Q1 Chazal | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 1 | 1 | |
| Tot Games | 9 | 9 | |
| pts | 36-29 | 36-29 | |
| Total points | 65 | 65 | |
| Winners | 7 | 7 | |
| %Winners | 19% | 19% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 11/34 | 11/34 | |
| % 1st in | 32% | 32% | |
| 1st pts | 7/11 | 7/11 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/23 | 16/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 70% | 70% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/6 | 1/6 | |
| Converted % | 17% | 17% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Agamenone | |||
| Q1 Latinovic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 69-54 | 69-54 | |
| Total points | 123 | 123 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 39/63 | 39/63 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 29/39 | 29/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/24 | 11/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jelle SelsSels – (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander DonskiDonski – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sandro KoppKopp – (1-0) – H2H and prediction