Garrett Johns and Trevor Svajda will fight against each other in the quarter of the Chicago Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 11:00 am on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Trevor Svajda who should win in 3 sets.
Trevor Svajda -> 1.53
Garrett Johns -> 2.375
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Garrett Johns vs. Trevor Svajda
There is no head to head record between Garrett Johns and Trevor Svajda since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Garrett Johns
45 - 18win/loss
296
279
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 54-30 | 33-19 | 21-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 30-23 | 16-12 | 13-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-16 | 29-11 | 5-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-8 | 13-4 | 6-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-9 | 9-6 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 343, Garrett got to the quarter after beating Billy Harris 3-6 6-3 6-4 and Alex Bolt 6-2 2-6 7-5.
In the 2nd round, The American defeated Bolt (6-2 2-6 7-5). During the match, Johns scored 93 points vs Bolt’s 90. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Regarding the service games, Johns made 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Garrett Johns lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Johns put 56% of his first serves in, winning 69% (33/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (21/37) on the 2nd serve. Johns broke Bolt 3 times after converting 23% of his break points (3/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Garrett has dropped 2 set in this competition to win 51% of the points he played.
Johns has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 64% of his matches (162-93). 23-9 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Johns has an overall103-53 record in the last 8 years on hard.
The American’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Palm Coast,M15 Sunrise,M15 Naples,M15 Huamantla and M25 Santo Domingo.
Garrett has a composed 44-18 win-loss record in 2025, 23-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Chicago Challenger
Trevor Svajda
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 27-12 | 25-9 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 13-8 | 12-5 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 9-7 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 565 (career-high), Svajda got to the quarter after beating Quinn Vandecasteele 6-4 6-4, Giles Hussey 7-6(4) 6-1, Jason Jung 6-3 7-6(7) and Beibit Zhukayev 6-3 6-0.
In the 2nd round, Svajda had a good straight sets win against Zhukayev (6-3 6-0). During the match Svajda scored 55 points vs Zhukayev’s 30. Trevor was pretty aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Talking about serving, Svajda managed to score 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Trevor Svajda was quite efficient on serve to win 81% (17/21) of his 1st serve and 67% (12/18) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Trevor broke Zhukayev 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Trevor started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this event to win 56% of the points he played.
Trevor’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 San Diego and M15 Lakewood.
Trevor has a composed 23-8 win-loss record in 2025, 21-6 on hard (See FULL STATS)
.Previously in the Chicago Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Johns | Svajda |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 56 | 77 |
| Pts | 185-178 | 291-227 |
| Total Points | 363 | 518 |
| Winners | 80 | 93 |
| %Winners | 43% | 32% |
Johns played 2 matches while Svajda competed in 4 matches. Svajda started his run from the qualifications while Johns had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Garrett Johns lost 2 sets while Trevor Svajda hasn’t dropped a set so far. Johns has played 2 set(s) less than Svajda (6 vs 8). Therefore, Johns played 21 games less than Svajda. Garrett scored 80 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Trevor struck 93 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Johns | Svajda |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 18 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 2.8 |
| 1st in | 108/171 | 146/255 |
| %1st in | 63% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 80/108 | 93/146 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 64% |
| 2nd pts | 34/63 | 61/109 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 56% |
Johns bagged 18 aces (9 per match). Svajda bagged 11 aces (2.8 per match). Johns won 74% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Svajda won 64% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Johns | Svajda |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 20 |
| Converted | 5/19 | 20/40 |
| % Converted | 26% | 50% |
| Conceded | 10 | 29 |
| Saved | 7 | 19 |
| % Saved | 70% | 66% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 10 |
Johns broke his opponents 5 times with a 26% conversion rate. Garrett dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded. Svajda broke his opponents 20 times with a 50% conversion rate. Trevor conceded his serve 10 times and he saved 66% of the break points that he conceded.
| Johns | ||||
| R1 Harris | R2 Bolt | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | 6-2 2-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | 56 | |
| pts | 92-88 | 93-90 | 185-178 | |
| Total points | 180 | 183 | 363 | |
| Winners | 47 | 33 | 80 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 35% | 43% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 11 | 7 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 60/86 | 48/85 | 108/171 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 56% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 47/60 | 33/48 | 80/108 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 69% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/26 | 21/37 | 34/63 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 57% | 54% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 3/13 | 5/19 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 23% | 26% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 4 | 10 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 2/4 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 50% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Svajda | ||||||
| Q1 Vandecasteele | Q3 Hussey | R1 Jung | R2 Zhukayev | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 7-64 6-1 | 6-3 7-67 | 6-3 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | 22 | 15 | 77 | |
| pts | 74-63 | 74-58 | 88-76 | 55-30 | 291-227 | |
| Total points | 137 | 132 | 164 | 85 | 518 | |
| Winners | 24 | 25 | 27 | 17 | 93 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 34% | 31% | 31% | 32% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 38/67 | 36/60 | 51/89 | 21/39 | 146/255 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 60% | 57% | 54% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 24/38 | 25/36 | 27/51 | 17/21 | 93/146 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 69% | 53% | 81% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/29 | 11/24 | 22/38 | 12/18 | 61/109 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 46% | 58% | 67% | 56% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 20 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/10 | 5/9 | 5/9 | 20/40 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 50% | 56% | 56% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 7 | 15 | 2 | 29 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 5/7 | 11/15 | 1/2 | 19 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 71% | 73% | 50% | 117% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 10 | |
Tennis Scores in Chicago Challenger
- Theodore Winegar/Michael ZhengWinegar/Michael Zheng – Yu Hsiou Hsu/Tsung-Hao HuangHsiou Hsu/Tsung-Hao Huang (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Andrew Fenty/Darian KingFenty/Darian King – Finn Reynolds/James WattReynolds/James Watt (6-4 3-6 10-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yibing WuWu – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – (1-0) – H2H and prediction