Martin Landaluce and Patrick Kypson will square off in the 1st round of the Cincinnati Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 6:30 pm on CHAMPIONS’ COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Martin Landaluce who should win in 3 sets.
Martin Landaluce -> 1.9
Patrick Kypson -> 1.9
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Martin Landaluce vs. Patrick Kypson
There is no head to head record between Martin Landaluce and Patrick Kypson since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Martin Landaluce
22 - 20win/loss
131
110
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37-29 | 18-11 | 6-10 | 5-4 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 42-24 | 23-9 | 13-11 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 26-27 | 11-10 | 15-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 137, Martin reached the 1st round after beating Cristian Garin 6-4 3-6 7-6(5) and Arthur Fery 6-2 6-7(5) 6-2.
In the qualifications, Landaluce defeated Fery (6-2 6-75 6-2). During the match, Landaluce scored 112 points vs Fery’s 93. The Spaniard was very aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Regarding the service games, Landaluce recorded 4 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Martin Landaluce lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Landaluce put 57% of his first serves in, winning 68% (40/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (25/45) on the 2nd serve. Landaluce broke Fery 6 times after converting 46% of his break points (6/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Spaniard started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has lost 2 set in this tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
Landaluce has a winning win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 55% of his matches (90-73). 8-3 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Landaluce has an aggregate42-23 match record in the last 4 years on hard.
The Spaniard’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Canberra Challenger,the Prague Challenger and the Nottingham 2 Challenger.
Martin has a composed 22-20 win-loss record in 2025, 8-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Cincinnati
Landaluce has never competed in this tournament before.
Patrick Kypson
26 - 9win/loss
117
117
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 45-15 | 19-8 | 7-1 | 19-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 26-27 | 8-11 | 4-7 | 12-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-21 | 10-11 | 17-6 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-14 | 13-7 | 2-2 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-11 | 4-2 | 20-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 213, the American got to the 1st round after defeating Matteo Gigante 6-3 6-2 and Aleksandar Vukic 7-6(3) 7-6(4).
In the qualifications, Kypson had a good straight sets win against Vukic (7-63 7-64). During the match Kypson scored 81 points vs Vukic’s 71. Patrick was exceptionally aggressive to blast 40 winners.
About the serving games, Kypson blasted 18 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Patrick Kypson was pretty efficient on serve to win 87% (40/46) of his 1st serve and 68% (17/25) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Kypson started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t lost yet a set in this competition to conquer 54% of the points he played.
His best result of the year was conquering the title the Bogota Challenger where he defeated Pedro Sakamoto in the final 6-1 6-3 and the Little Rock Challenger where he overcame Michael Zheng in the final 6-1 1-6 7-5.
The American has an overall 26-9 win-loss record in 2025, 19-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Landaluce | Kypson |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 61 | 43 |
| Pts | 211-195 | 146-123 |
| Total Points | 406 | 269 |
| Winners | 81 | 67 |
| %Winners | 38% | 46% |
Both Landaluce and Kypson played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Martin Landaluce conceded 2 sets while Patrick Kypson hasn’t dropped a set so far. Landaluce has played 2 sets more than Kypson (6 vs 4). Therefore, Landaluce played 18 games more than Kypson. The Spaniard scored 81 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Patrick made 67 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Landaluce | Kypson |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 25 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 12.5 |
| 1st in | 117/200 | 83/135 |
| %1st in | 59% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 81/117 | 67/83 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 46/83 | 33/52 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 63% |
Landaluce bagged 12 aces (6 per match). Kypson made 25 aces (12.5 per match). Landaluce won 69% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Kypson won 81% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Landaluce | Kypson |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 3 |
| Converted | 9/20 | 3/9 |
| % Converted | 45% | 33% |
| Conceded | 19 | 4 |
| Saved | 14 | 4 |
| % Saved | 74% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 0 |
Landaluce broke his opponents 9 times with a 45% conversion rate. Landaluce dropped his serve 5 times and he saved 74% of the break points that he conceded. Patrick broke his opponents 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Patrick was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 4 break points.
| Landaluce | ||||
| Q1 Garin | Q3 Fery | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 7-65 | 6-2 6-75 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 29 | 61 | |
| pts | 99-102 | 112-93 | 211-195 | |
| Total points | 201 | 205 | 406 | |
| Winners | 41 | 40 | 81 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 36% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 4 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 9 | 17 | |
| 1st in | 58/96 | 59/104 | 117/200 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 57% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 41/58 | 40/59 | 81/117 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 68% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/38 | 25/45 | 46/83 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 56% | 55% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 6/13 | 9/20 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 46% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 6 | 19 | |
| Saved | 10/13 | 4/6 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 77% | 67% | 72% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Kypson | ||||
| Q1 Gigante | Q3 Vukic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 7-63 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 26 | 43 | |
| pts | 65-52 | 81-71 | 146-123 | |
| Total points | 117 | 152 | 269 | |
| Winners | 27 | 40 | 67 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 49% | 46% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 7 | 18 | 25 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 37/64 | 46/71 | 83/135 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 65% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 27/37 | 40/46 | 67/83 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 87% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/27 | 17/25 | 33/52 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 68% | 63% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 0/3 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 0% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 1/1 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores in Cincinnati
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Nuno BorgesBorges (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Zizou BergsBergs – Jacob FearnleyFearnley (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Giovanni Mpetshi PerricardMpetshi Perricard (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Nicolas JarryJarry (1-6 6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Matteo ArnaldiArnaldi (6-71 6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Joao FonsecaFonseca – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (4-6 6-2 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Vit KoprivaKopriva (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Hugo GastonGaston (6-4 5-7 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gael MonfilsMonfils – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Reilly OpelkaOpelka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcos GironGiron – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Adrian MannarinoMannarino (4-5) – H2H and prediction
- Borna CoricCoric – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Vit KoprivaKopriva (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Tommy PaulPaul (1-4) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Valentin RoyerRoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Casper RuudRuud – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (4-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Zizou BergsBergs – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Alexandre MullerMuller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Kei NishikoriNishikori (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Mariano NavoneNavone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian BaezBaez – David GoffinGoffin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (0-2) – H2H and prediction