Kamil Majchrzak and Daniil Glinka will fight against each other in the quarter of the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 6:00 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kamil Majchrzak who should win in 2 sets.
Kamil Majchrzak -> 1.22
Daniil Glinka -> 3.92
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Kamil Majchrzak vs. Daniil Glinka
There is no head to head record between Kamil Majchrzak and Daniil Glinka since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Kamil Majchrzak
27 - 16win/loss
64
61
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 39-23 | 19-6 | 12-7 | 5-6 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 63-19 | 26-6 | 34-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-22 | 19-10 | 4-6 | 4-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-21 | 4-4 | 16-9 | 5-5 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 81, Kamil got to the quarter after defeating Ilya Ivashka 3-6 6-0 7-5 and Tomasz Berkieta 6-3 6-2.
In the 2nd round, The Pole had a good straight sets win against Berkieta (6-3 6-2). During the match, Majchrzak scored 65 points vs Berkieta’s 42. The Pole was extremely aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Majchrzak scored just 1 ace in the encounter and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults. Kamil Majchrzak was pretty efficient on serve to win 81% (26/32) of his 1st serve and 74% (14/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Pole broke Berkieta 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Kamil has dropped 1 set in this event to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Majchrzak has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (348-199). 10-3 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Majchrzak has a compiled 105-51 match record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Madrid Challenger where he beat Marin Cilic in the final 6-3 4-6 6-4.
The Pole has a composed 27-16 win-loss record in 2025, 10-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
Daniil Glinka
35 - 16win/loss
191
191
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 60-23 | 25-14 | 0-0 | 30-9 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2024 | 37-29 | 19-14 | 0-1 | 14-12 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 2023 | 40-23 | 18-14 | 0-1 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
| 2022 | 23-29 | 17-22 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 29-31 | 9-14 | 12-11 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 371 (career-high), Daniil reached the quarter after beating David Poljak 6-4 6-2, Amit Vales 6-1 6-4, Radu Albot 6-3 6-4 and Maks Kasnikowski 7-6(7) 6-4.
In the 2nd round, The Estonian had a good straight sets win against Kasnikowski (7-67 6-4). During the match Glinka scored 82 points vs Kasnikowski’s 72. Glinka was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Glinka scored 4 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Daniil Glinka lost the serve 5 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Glinka put 49% of his first serves in, winning 76% (28/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 33% (13/39) on the 2nd serve. Daniil broke Kasnikowski 6 times after converting 40% of his break points (6/15).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Daniil started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t dropped yet a set in this competition to conquer 55% of the points he played.
Glinka’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Trento and M25 Trimbach.
Daniil has an aggregate 35-16 win-loss record in 2025, 18-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Majchrzak | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 44 | 77 |
| Pts | 160-127 | 270-219 |
| Total Points | 287 | 489 |
| Winners | 54 | 100 |
| %Winners | 34% | 37% |
Majchrzak played 2 matches while Glinka competed in 4 matches. Glinka started his run from the qualifications while Majchrzak had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Kamil Majchrzak surrendered 1 set while Daniil Glinka hasn’t dropped a set so far. Majchrzak has played 3 set(s) less than Glinka (5 vs 8). Therefore, Majchrzak played 33 games less than Glinka. Majchrzak scored 54 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, The Estonian blasted 100 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Majchrzak | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 17 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 4.3 |
| 1st in | 77/133 | 141/246 |
| %1st in | 58% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 54/77 | 100/141 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 35/56 | 54/105 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 51% |
Majchrzak recorded 8 aces (4 per match). Glinka managed to score 17 aces (4.3 per match). Majchrzak won 70% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Glinka won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Majchrzak | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 17 |
| Converted | 9/14 | 17/35 |
| % Converted | 64% | 49% |
| Conceded | 14 | 14 |
| Saved | 11 | 6 |
| % Saved | 79% | 43% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 8 |
Kamil broke his opponents 9 times with a 64% conversion rate. Majchrzak dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded. The Estonian broke his opponents 17 times with a 49% conversion rate. Glinka conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded.
| Majchrzak | ||||
| R1 Ivashka | R2 Berkieta | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-0 7-5 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 17 | 44 | |
| pts | 95-85 | 65-42 | 160-127 | |
| Total points | 180 | 107 | 287 | |
| Winners | 28 | 26 | 54 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 40% | 34% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 7 | 1 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 45/82 | 32/51 | 77/133 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 63% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 28/45 | 26/32 | 54/77 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 81% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/37 | 14/19 | 35/56 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 74% | 63% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 6 | 3 | 9 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 3/4 | 9/14 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 75% | 64% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 5 | 14 | |
| Saved | 6/9 | 5/5 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 100% | 84% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| Glinka | ||||||
| Q1 Poljak | Q3 Vales | R1 Albot | R2 Kasnikowski | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-1 6-4 | 6-3 6-4 | 7-67 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 17 | 19 | 23 | 77 | |
| pts | 69-48 | 63-46 | 56-53 | 82-72 | 270-219 | |
| Total points | 117 | 109 | 109 | 154 | 489 | |
| Winners | 23 | 27 | 22 | 28 | 100 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 43% | 39% | 34% | 37% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 16 | |
| 1st in | 31/56 | 38/58 | 35/56 | 37/76 | 141/246 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 66% | 63% | 49% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 23/31 | 27/38 | 22/35 | 28/37 | 100/141 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 71% | 63% | 76% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | 13/20 | 13/21 | 13/39 | 54/105 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 65% | 62% | 33% | 51% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 17 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 3/5 | 4/8 | 6/15 | 17/35 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 60% | 50% | 40% | 49% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 14 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 0/0 | 1/3 | 4/9 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 50% | – | 33% | 44% | 64% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Daniil GlinkaGlinka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Harold MayotMayot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – (1-0) – H2H and prediction