Daniil Glinka and Maks Kasnikowski will face off in the 2nd round of the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 7:00 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Maks Kasnikowski who should win in 3 sets.
Maks Kasnikowski -> 1.78
Daniil Glinka -> 1.95
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Daniil Glinka vs. Maks Kasnikowski
There is no head to head record between Daniil Glinka and Maks Kasnikowski since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Daniil Glinka
34 - 16win/loss
191
191
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 60-23 | 25-14 | 0-0 | 30-9 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2024 | 37-29 | 19-14 | 0-1 | 14-12 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 2023 | 40-23 | 18-14 | 0-1 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
| 2022 | 23-29 | 17-22 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 29-31 | 9-14 | 12-11 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 371 (career-high), Daniil got to the 2nd round after beating David Poljak 6-4 6-2, Amit Vales 6-1 6-4 and Radu Albot 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Glinka had a good straight sets win against Albot (6-3 6-4). During the match, Glinka scored 56 points vs Albot’s 53. The Estonian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Glinka managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Daniil Glinka lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Glinka put 63% of his first serves in, winning 63% (22/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (13/21) on the 2nd serve. Daniil broke Albot 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Glinka has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 55% of his matches (210-170). 17-10 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Glinka has an aggregate102-91 record in the last 8 years on hard.
The Estonian’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Trento and M25 Trimbach.
Glinka has an overall 34-16 win-loss record in 2025, 17-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
Maks Kasnikowski
13 - 8win/loss
409
168
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-15 | 9-5 | 9-6 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 40-28 | 6-8 | 22-13 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-25 | 13-6 | 22-14 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-19 | 16-7 | 20-10 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-11 | 7-5 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 528, Maks got to the 2nd
round after beating Hugo Grenier 4-6 7-6(5) 6-1.In the 1st round against Grenier, Kasnikowski recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-6(5) 6-1). During the match Kasnikowski scored 96 points vs Grenier’s 83. Kasnikowski was very aggressive to blast 41 winners.
About the serving games, Kasnikowski managed to score 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Maks Kasnikowski lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Kasnikowski put 61% of his first serves in, winning 67% (41/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (24/39) on the 2nd serve. Maks broke Grenier 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Maks’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Koszalin.
The Pole has a composed 12-8 win-loss record in 2025, 4-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Glinka | Kasnikowski |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 54 | 30 |
| Pts | 188-147 | 96-83 |
| Total Points | 335 | 179 |
| Winners | 72 | 41 |
| %Winners | 38% | 43% |
Glinka played 3 matches while Kasnikowski competed in 1 match. Glinka started his run from the qualifications while Kasnikowski had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Maks Kasnikowski conceded 1 set while Daniil Glinka hasn’t conceded a set so far. Glinka has played 3 sets more than Kasnikowski (6 vs 3). Therefore, Glinka played 24 games more than Kasnikowski. Glinka scored 72 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Pole managed to score 41 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Glinka | Kasnikowski |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 13 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 4.3 | 4 |
| 1st in | 104/170 | 61/100 |
| %1st in | 61% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 72/104 | 41/61 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 41/66 | 24/39 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 62% |
Glinka struck 13 aces (4.3 per match). Kasnikowski recorded 4 aces . Glinka won 69% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Kasnikowski won 67% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Glinka | Kasnikowski |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 4 |
| Converted | 11/20 | 4/5 |
| % Converted | 55% | 80% |
| Conceded | 5 | 7 |
| Saved | 2 | 4 |
| % Saved | 40% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
The Estonian broke his opponents 11 times with a 55% conversion rate. Daniil conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded. Kasnikowski broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. The Pole conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
| Glinka | |||||
| Q1 Poljak | Q3 Vales | R1 Albot | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-1 6-4 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 17 | 19 | 54 | |
| pts | 69-48 | 63-46 | 56-53 | 188-147 | |
| Total points | 117 | 109 | 109 | 335 | |
| Winners | 23 | 27 | 22 | 72 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 43% | 39% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 5 | 5 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 31/56 | 38/58 | 35/56 | 104/170 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 66% | 63% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 23/31 | 27/38 | 22/35 | 72/104 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 71% | 63% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | 13/20 | 13/21 | 41/66 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 65% | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 4 | 11 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 3/5 | 4/8 | 11/20 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 60% | 50% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 0/0 | 1/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | – | 33% | 28% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | |
| Kasnikowski | |||||
| R1 Grenier | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-1 | ||||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |||
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |||
| pts | 96-83 | 96-83 | |||
| Total points | 179 | 179 | |||
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |||
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |||
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |||
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |||
| 1st in | 61/100 | 61/100 | |||
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |||
| 1st pts | 41/61 | 41/61 | |||
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |||
| 2nd pts | 24/39 | 24/39 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |||
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |||
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |||
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |||
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |||
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |||
| Saved % | 57% | 19% | |||
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |||
Tennis Scores in Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
- Federico CinaCina – Kyrian JacquetJacquet (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Johannus MondayMonday (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Hugo GrenierGrenier (4-6 7-6(5) 6-1) – See score progression
- Justin EngelEngel – Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas (6-75 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Rafael JodarJodar (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Filip PieczonkaPieczonka (6-74 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Maximus JonesJones (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Tomasz BerkietaBerkieta – Matias SotoSoto (7-65 7-65) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – Clement ChidekhChidekh (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Radu AlbotAlbot (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Filip PieczonkaPieczonka (6-7(4) 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Petr BrunclikBrunclik – Calvin HemeryHemery (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (3-6 6-0 7-5) – See score progression
- Dino PrizmicPrizmic – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Ugo Blanchet/Kyrian JacquetBlanchet/Kyrian Jacquet – Hugo Grenier/Calvin HemeryGrenier/Calvin Hemery (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Olaf PieczkowskiPieczkowski – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Hugo GrenierGrenier (4-6 7-6(5) 6-1) – See score progression
- Federico CinaCina – Kyrian JacquetJacquet (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Filip PieczonkaPieczonka (6-7(4) 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Rafael JodarJodar (7-6(1) 6-4) – See score progression
- Petr BrunclikBrunclik – Calvin HemeryHemery (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Johannus MondayMonday (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – Clement ChidekhChidekh (6-4 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Maximus JonesJones (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ugo BlanchetBlanchet – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – (0-0) – H2H and prediction