Elmer Moller and Yanaki Milev will face off in the 2nd round of the Bonn Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Elmer Moller who should win in 2 sets.
Elmer Moller -> 1.119
Yanaki Milev -> 5.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Elmer Moller vs. Yanaki Milev
This will be the 2nd time that Elmer Moller and Yanaki Milev square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Milev (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Milev won 3-6 7-5 6-3 in the 2nd round in M15 Antalya back in 2022.
Elmer Moller
24 - 19win/loss
152
102
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-26 | 0-6 | 26-17 | 3-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 62-26 | 5-3 | 52-21 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-21 | 14-11 | 31-8 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-15 | 10-5 | 12-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 13-9 | 8-4 | 2-4 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 105, Elmer got to the 2nd round after defeating Gonzalo Villanueva 7-6(4) 6-2.
In the 1st round, Elmer had a good straight sets win against Villanueva (7-64 6-2). During the match, Moller scored 65 points vs Villanueva’s 56. The Dane was exceptionally aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Regarding the service games, Moller fired 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Elmer Moller was quite effective on serve to win 77% (27/35) of his 1st serve and 61% (17/28) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Moller broke Villanueva 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Moller has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 66% of his matches (176-91). 21-11 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Moller has an aggregate118-51 match record in the last 6 years on clay.
His best result of the current season was conquering the title the Oeiras 4 Challenger where he defeated Francisco Comesana in the final 6-0 6-4 and the Iasi Challenger where he overcame Titouan Droguet in the final 3-6 6-1 7-6(2).
Elmer has an aggregate 24-19 win-loss record in 2025, 21-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bonn Challenger
Moller has never competed in this tournament before.
Yanaki Milev
20 - 18win/loss
705
443
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-28 | 3-2 | 25-25 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-27 | 0-1 | 39-25 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-26 | 0-0 | 35-25 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-15 | 4-3 | 17-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 825, the Bulgarian reached the 2nd round after beating Neil Oberleitner 6-4 3-6 6-4, Sebastian Gima 7-5 6-4 and Niels Mcdonald 4-6 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round against Mcdonald, Yanaki recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-4). During the match Milev scored 102 points vs Mcdonald’s 92. Milev was quite aggressive to blast 40 winners.
About the serving games, Milev scored 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Yanaki Milev lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Milev put 61% of his first serves in, winning 68% (40/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 58% (22/38) on the 2nd serve. Yanaki broke Mcdonald 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
The Bulgarian’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M15 Kursumlijska Banja.
Milev has an overall 20-18 win-loss record in 2025, 16-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bonn Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Moller | Milev |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 81 |
| Pts | 65-56 | 260-253 |
| Total Points | 121 | 513 |
| Winners | 27 | 110 |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% |
Moller played 1 match while Milev competed in 3 matches. Milev started his run from the qualifications while Moller had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Yanaki Milev dropped 2 sets while Elmer Moller hasn’t lost a set so far. Moller has played 6 set(s) less than Milev (2 vs 8). Therefore, Moller played 60 games less than Milev. Moller scored 27 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The Bulgarian scored 110 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Moller | Milev |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 4 |
| 1st in | 35/63 | 164/266 |
| %1st in | 56% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 27/35 | 110/164 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 17/28 | 56/102 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 55% |
Moller recorded 6 aces . Milev made 12 aces (4 per match). Moller won 77% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Milev won 67% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Moller | Milev |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 11 |
| Converted | 3/5 | 11/27 |
| % Converted | 60% | 41% |
| Conceded | 2 | 18 |
| Saved | 1 | 11 |
| % Saved | 50% | 61% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 7 |
Elmer broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Elmer surrendered his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Bulgarian broke his opponents 11 times with a 41% conversion rate. The Bulgarian conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 61% of the break points that he conceded.
| Moller | |||
| R1 Villanueva | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 65-56 | 65-56 | |
| Total points | 121 | 121 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 35/63 | 35/63 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 27/35 | 27/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/28 | 17/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Milev | |||||
| Q1 Oberleitner | Q3 Gima | R1 Mcdonald | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | 7-5 6-4 | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 22 | 30 | 81 | |
| pts | 90-102 | 68-59 | 102-92 | 260-253 | |
| Total points | 192 | 127 | 194 | 513 | |
| Winners | 43 | 27 | 40 | 110 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 40% | 39% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 3 | 4 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 68/103 | 37/66 | 59/97 | 164/266 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 56% | 61% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 43/68 | 27/37 | 40/59 | 110/164 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 73% | 68% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/35 | 15/29 | 22/38 | 56/102 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 52% | 58% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 4 | 11 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 4/7 | 4/10 | 11/27 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 57% | 40% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 3 | 9 | 18 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 1/3 | 6/9 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 33% | 67% | 167% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
Tennis Scores in Bonn Challenger
- Elmer MollerMoller – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Joel SchwaerzlerSchwaerzler – Christoph NegrituNegritu (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Clement TaburTabur (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Yanaki MilevMilev – Niels McdonaldMcdonald (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Federico CoriaCoria – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Raphael CollignonCollignon – Peter FajtaFajta (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Vilius GaubasGaubas – Diego DeduraDedura (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva – Olle WallinWallin (6-2 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Lautaro MidonMidon – Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Martin KrumichKrumich – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Jerome KymKym – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Dmitry PopkoPopko (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Sumit NagalNagal (7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Jamie MackenzieMackenzie – Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaPucinelli De Almeida (6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Benjamin HassanHassan (6-4 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Clement TaburTabur (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Lautaro MidonMidon – Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Vilius GaubasGaubas – Diego DeduraDedura (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Martin KrumichKrumich – Patrick ZahrajZahraj (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Joel SchwaerzlerSchwaerzler – Christoph NegrituNegritu (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Federico CoriaCoria – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Yanaki MilevMilev – Niels McdonaldMcdonald (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva – Olle WallinWallin (6-2 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Jerome KymKym – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Raphael CollignonCollignon – Peter FajtaFajta (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Timofey SkatovSkatov (0-0) – H2H and prediction