Radu Albot and Daniil Glinka will clash against each other in the 1st round of the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 11:00 am on COURT 12. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Radu Albot who should win in 3 sets.
Radu Albot -> 1.81
Daniil Glinka -> 1.92
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Radu Albot vs. Daniil Glinka
There is no head to head record between Radu Albot and Daniil Glinka since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Radu Albot
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 26-34 | 15-14 | 11-16 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 37-26 | 12-9 | 17-11 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-34 | 10-13 | 13-8 | 12-10 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-30 | 25-14 | 4-6 | 3-5 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-27 | 4-9 | 2-8 | 13-6 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 310, Radu reached the 1st round after defeating Hubert Jakub Plenkiewicz 6-2 6-4 and Tadeas Paroulek 6-0 7-6(3).
In the qualifications, The Moldovan had a good straight sets win against Paroulek (6-0 7-63). During the match, Albot scored 75 points vs Paroulek’s 55. Radu was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Albot scored just 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault. Radu Albot was extremely efficient on serve to win 76% (31/41) of his 1st serve and 63% (10/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Albot broke Paroulek 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Moldovan started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t conceded yet a set in this competition to conquer 59% of the points he played.
Albot has good record in the last 10 years having won 53% of his matches (317-286). 4-7 on hard in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Albot has an aggregate 130-114 match record in the last years on hard.
The Moldovan has a composed 15-26 win-loss record in 2025, 4-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
Radu has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniil Glinka
33 - 16win/loss
195
191
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 60-23 | 25-14 | 0-0 | 30-9 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2024 | 37-29 | 19-14 | 0-1 | 14-12 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 2023 | 40-23 | 18-14 | 0-1 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
| 2022 | 23-29 | 17-22 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 29-31 | 9-14 | 12-11 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 371 (career-high), Daniil reached the 1st round after beating David Poljak 6-4 6-2 and Amit Vales 6-1 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Estonian had a good straight sets win against Vales (6-1 6-4). During the match Glinka scored 63 points vs Vales’s 46. Glinka was very aggressive to blast 27 winners.
About the serving games, Glinka fired 5 aces and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Daniil Glinka was quite efficient on serve to win 71% (27/38) of his 1st serve and 65% (13/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Daniil broke Vales 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Estonian started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this tournament to conquer 58% of the points he played.
Daniil’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Trento and M25 Trimbach.
Glinka has an aggregate 33-16 win-loss record in 2025, 16-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Albot | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 37 | 35 |
| Pts | 136-93 | 132-94 |
| Total Points | 229 | 226 |
| Winners | 54 | 50 |
| %Winners | 40% | 38% |
Both Albot and Glinka played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Albot and Glinka have played the same amount of sets 4. However, Albot played 2 games more than Glinka. Radu scored 54 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Glinka recorded 50 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Albot | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 1.5 | 4 |
| 1st in | 66/98 | 69/114 |
| %1st in | 67% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 54/66 | 50/69 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 23/32 | 28/45 |
| %2nd pts | 72% | 62% |
Albot fired 3 aces (1.5 per match). Glinka made 8 aces (4 per match). Albot won 82% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 72% of the points. On the other side, Glinka won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Albot | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 7 |
| Converted | 6/15 | 7/12 |
| % Converted | 40% | 58% |
| Conceded | 1 | 2 |
| Saved | 1 | 1 |
| % Saved | 100% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Albot broke his opponents 6 times with a 40% conversion rate. Albot pretty effective on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points. The Estonian broke his opponents 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. Glinka conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Albot | ||||
| Q1 Jakub | Q3 Paroulek | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | 6-0 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 19 | 37 | |
| pts | 61-38 | 75-55 | 136-93 | |
| Total points | 99 | 130 | 229 | |
| Winners | 23 | 31 | 54 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 41% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 25/41 | 41/57 | 66/98 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 72% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 23/25 | 31/41 | 54/66 | |
| % 1st pts | 92% | 76% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/16 | 10/16 | 23/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 81% | 63% | 72% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/6 | 6/15 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 50% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Glinka | ||||
| Q1 Poljak | Q3 Vales | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 17 | 35 | |
| pts | 69-48 | 63-46 | 132-94 | |
| Total points | 117 | 109 | 226 | |
| Winners | 23 | 27 | 50 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 43% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 5 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 0 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 31/56 | 38/58 | 69/114 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 66% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 23/31 | 27/38 | 50/69 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 71% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | 13/20 | 28/45 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 65% | 62% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 3/5 | 7/12 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 60% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 0/0 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | – | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Tennis Scores in Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (3-6 6-0 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dino PrizmicPrizmic – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Olaf PieczkowskiPieczkowski – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Calvin HemeryHemery – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Radu AlbotAlbot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – Harold MayotMayot (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction