Sebastian Gima and Yanaki Milev will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Bonn Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:30 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sebastian Gima who should win in 3 sets.
Sebastian Gima -> 1.61
Yanaki Milev -> 2.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Sebastian Gima vs. Yanaki Milev
There is no head to head record between Sebastian Gima and Yanaki Milev since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Sebastian Gima
28 - 22win/loss
561
436
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 42-34 | 9-5 | 33-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 34-33 | 3-5 | 31-28 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 57-35 | 15-8 | 41-25 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 48-30 | 25-11 | 23-18 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 31-24 | 1-3 | 28-20 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 660, the Romanian reached the qualifications after defeating Florian Broska 6-1 6-4.
In the qualifications, Gima had a good straight sets win against Broska (6-1 6-4). During the match, Gima scored 62 points vs Broska’s 42. The Romanian was very aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gima scored 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Sebastian Gima lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Gima put 50% of his first serves in, winning 70% (19/27) of the points behind his 1st serve and 63% (17/27) on the 2nd serve. Sebastian broke Broska 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Gima has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 57% of his matches (215-161). 22-18 on clay in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Gima has a composed153-119 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
Sebastian’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Palm Coast and M15 Ljubljana.
Sebastian has an overall 28-22 win-loss record in 2025, 22-18 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bonn Challenger
The Romanian has never competed in this tournament before.
Yanaki Milev
18 - 18win/loss
705
443
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-28 | 3-2 | 25-25 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-27 | 0-1 | 39-25 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-26 | 0-0 | 35-25 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-15 | 4-3 | 17-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 825, Milev reached the qualifications after beating Neil Oberleitner 6-4 3-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, Yanaki defeated Oberleitner (6-4 3-6 6-4).During the match Milev scored less points (12) than Oberleitner. In fact, the world no. 660 won 90 points vs Oberleitner’s. That means that Milev was more focused during the important points. Yanaki was very aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about serving, Milev recorded 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Yanaki Milev lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Milev put 66% of his first serves in, winning 63% (43/68) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (19/35) on the 2nd serve. The Bulgarian broke Oberleitner 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Milev’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Kursumlijska Banja.
The Bulgarian has a compiled 18-18 win-loss record in 2025, 14-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bonn Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gima | Milev |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 29 |
| Pts | 62-42 | 90-102 |
| Total Points | 104 | 192 |
| Winners | 19 | 43 |
| %Winners | 31% | 48% |
Both Gima and Milev played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Yanaki Milev dropped 1 set while Sebastian Gima hasn’t conceded a set so far. Gima has played 1 set(s) less than Milev (2 vs 3). Therefore, Gima played 12 games less than Milev. The Romanian scored 19 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, The Bulgarian made 43 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gima | Milev |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 5 |
| 1st in | 27/54 | 68/103 |
| %1st in | 50% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 19/27 | 43/68 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 63% |
| 2nd pts | 17/27 | 19/35 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 54% |
Gima recorded 2 aces . Milev managed to score 5 aces . Gima won 70% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Milev won 63% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gima | Milev |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 3/10 |
| % Converted | 50% | 30% |
| Conceded | 2 | 6 |
| Saved | 1 | 4 |
| % Saved | 50% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Gima broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Sebastian surrendered his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Yanaki broke his opponent 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. Yanaki conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gima | |||
| Q1 Broska | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 62-42 | 62-42 | |
| Total points | 104 | 104 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 27/54 | 27/54 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 50% | |
| 1st pts | 19/27 | 19/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/27 | 17/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Milev | |||
| Q1 Oberleitner | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 90-102 | 90-102 | |
| Total points | 192 | 192 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 68/103 | 68/103 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 43/68 | 43/68 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/35 | 19/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 3/10 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Clement TaburTabur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva – Sergey FominFomin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex MolcanMolcan – Martin KrumichKrumich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Dmitry PopkoPopko (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias – Mikael YmerYmer (0-0) – H2H and prediction