Daniil Glinka and Amit Vales will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on COURT 13. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniil Glinka who should win in 2 sets.
Daniil Glinka -> 1.24
Amit Vales -> 3.72
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Daniil Glinka vs. Amit Vales
There is no head to head record between Daniil Glinka and Amit Vales since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Daniil Glinka
32 - 16win/loss
191
191
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 60-23 | 25-14 | 0-0 | 30-9 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2024 | 37-29 | 19-14 | 0-1 | 14-12 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 2023 | 40-23 | 18-14 | 0-1 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
| 2022 | 23-29 | 17-22 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 29-31 | 9-14 | 12-11 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 371 (career-high), Daniil reached the qualifications after defeating David Poljak 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Estonian had a good straight sets win against Poljak (6-4 6-2). During the match, Glinka scored 69 points vs Poljak’s 48. The Estonian was very aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Glinka scored 3 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Daniil Glinka was very effective on serve to win 74% (23/31) of his 1st serve and 60% (15/25) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Daniil broke Poljak 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Glinka has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 55% of his matches (208-170). 15-10 on hard in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Glinka has an aggregate100-91 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
Daniil’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Trento and M25 Trimbach.
The Estonian has a compiled 32-16 win-loss record in 2025, 15-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
Amit Vales
21 - 18win/loss
880
785
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 27-24 | 22-20 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 26-22 | 26-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 13-10 | 13-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 6-5 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 895, the Israeli got to the qualifications after beating Luca Potenza 6-4 3-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Israeli defeated Potenza (6-4 3-6 6-4). During the match Vales scored 91 points vs Potenza’s 86. Vales was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Vales recorded 8 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Amit Vales lost the serve 4 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Vales put 54% of his first serves in, winning 76% (34/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (17/38) on the 2nd serve. Vales broke Potenza 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Amit has an aggregate 21-18 win-loss record in 2025, 16-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
Vales has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Glinka | Vales |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 29 |
| Pts | 69-48 | 91-86 |
| Total Points | 117 | 177 |
| Winners | 23 | 34 |
| %Winners | 33% | 37% |
Both Glinka and Vales played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Amit Vales surrendered 1 set while Daniil Glinka hasn’t dropped a set so far. Glinka has played 1 set(s) less than Vales (2 vs 3). Therefore, Glinka played 11 games less than Vales. Glinka scored 23 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, The Israeli struck 34 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Glinka | Vales |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 8 |
| 1st in | 31/56 | 45/83 |
| %1st in | 55% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 23/31 | 34/45 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | 17/38 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 45% |
Glinka bagged 3 aces . Vales recorded 8 aces . Glinka won 74% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Vales won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Glinka | Vales |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 5/10 |
| % Converted | 57% | 50% |
| Conceded | 2 | 6 |
| Saved | 1 | 2 |
| % Saved | 50% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Daniil broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Daniil lost his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Israeli broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. Vales conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Glinka | |||
| Q1 Poljak | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 69-48 | 69-48 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 31/56 | 31/56 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 23/31 | 23/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | 15/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Vales | |||
| Q1 Potenza | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 91-86 | 91-86 | |
| Total points | 177 | 177 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 45/83 | 45/83 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 34/45 | 34/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/38 | 17/38 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 2/6 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard BerankisBerankis – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Tadeas ParoulekParoulek (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – Harold MayotMayot (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction