Ryan Nijboer and Sebastian Sorger will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Cordenons Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on ACQUA MANIVA (13). In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ryan Nijboer who should win in 3 sets.
Ryan Nijboer -> 1.58
Sebastian Sorger -> 2.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Ryan Nijboer vs. Sebastian Sorger
There is no head to head record between Ryan Nijboer and Sebastian Sorger since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Ryan Nijboer
29 - 24win/loss
505
371
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 42-35 | 9-6 | 32-24 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 53-38 | 8-3 | 45-32 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 55-32 | 12-9 | 41-21 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-23 | 1-6 | 22-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-28 | 9-13 | 18-13 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 430, Ryan got to the qualifications after beating Mirza Basic 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Nijboer had a good straight sets win against Basic (6-4 6-4). During the match, Nijboer scored 59 points vs Basic’s 49. Ryan was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Nijboer scored just 1 ace in the encounter and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Ryan Nijboer was extremely effective on serve to win 74% (25/34) of his 1st serve and 57% (13/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Nijboer broke Basic 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Nijboer has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 57% of his matches (281-214). 24-16 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Nijboer has an overall179-129 match record in the last 9 years on clay.
Nijboer’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Manacor and M25 The Hague.
Ryan has an overall 29-24 win-loss record in 2025, 24-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cordenons Challenger
Sebastian Sorger
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 35-24 | 0-1 | 35-23 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 35-25 | 1-3 | 34-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-30 | 32-14 | 20-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-22 | 9-7 | 19-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 588, Sebastian reached the qualifications after beating Enzo Couacaud 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Sorger had a good straight sets win against Couacaud (6-4 6-2). During the match Sorger scored 59 points vs Couacaud’s 45. The Austrian was extremely aggressive to blast 19 winners.
About the serving games, Sorger couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Sebastian Sorger lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Sorger put 71% of his first serves in, winning 54% (19/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (8/14) on the 2nd serve. The Austrian broke Couacaud 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
The Austrian’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Telfs.
The Austrian has an aggregate 23-14 win-loss record in 2025, 23-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cordenons Challenger
Sebastian has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nijboer | Sorger |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 18 |
| Pts | 59-49 | 59-45 |
| Total Points | 108 | 104 |
| Winners | 25 | 19 |
| %Winners | 42% | 32% |
Both Nijboer and Sorger played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Nijboer and Sorger have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Nijboer played 2 games more than Sorger. The Dutch scored 25 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Sebastian blasted 19 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nijboer | Sorger |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 0 |
| 1st in | 34/57 | 35/49 |
| %1st in | 60% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 25/34 | 19/35 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 54% |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 8/14 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 57% |
Nijboer blasted 1 ace . Sorger didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Nijboer won 74% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Sorger won 54% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nijboer | Sorger |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 6 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 6/9 |
| % Converted | 57% | 67% |
| Conceded | 2 | 6 |
| Saved | 0 | 3 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
The Dutch broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Sebastian broke his opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. Sorger conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nijboer | |||
| Q1 Basic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 59-49 | 59-49 | |
| Total points | 108 | 108 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 34/57 | 34/57 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 25/34 | 25/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 13/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Sorger | |||
| Q1 Couacaud | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 59-45 | 59-45 | |
| Total points | 104 | 104 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 35/49 | 35/49 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 19/35 | 19/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 54% | 54% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/14 | 8/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Andrea GuerrieriGuerrieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco – Dusan LajovicLajovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano KestelboimKestelboim – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Eric VanshelboimVanshelboim (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan NijboerNijboer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max Alcala GurriAlcala Gurri – Dominik KellovskyKellovsky (1-0) – H2H and prediction