Zachary Svajda and Bernard Tomic will clash against each other in the final of the Lexington Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 1:00 pm on STADIUM 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Zachary Svajda who should win in 2 sets.
Zachary Svajda -> 1.23
Bernard Tomic -> 3.82
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Zachary Svajda vs. Bernard Tomic
This will be the 2nd time that Zachary Svajda and Bernard Tomic fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Svajda (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played each other, Svajda won 7-5 6-1 in the qualifications in Washington back in July 2025.
Zachary Svajda
29 - 18win/loss
141
102
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33-21 | 18-15 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 14-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 37-35 | 27-21 | 2-4 | 2-5 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-24 | 28-8 | 2-6 | 10-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-23 | 25-14 | 0-3 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-13 | 24-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 148, Zachary got to the final after beating Alex Rybakov 6-2 7-6(10), Ryuki Matsuda 6-1 6-0
, Nishesh Basavareddy 1-6 7-5 6-4 and Yu Hsiou Hsu 6-1 6-3.In the semifinal, Svajda had a good straight sets win against Hsiou Hsu (6-1 6-3). During the match, Svajda scored 55 points vs Hsiou Hsu’s 34. Svajda was extremely aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about the service games, Svajda managed to score 5 aces and he was pretty steady in conceding no double faults. Overall, Zachary Svajda was very effective on serve to win 83% (19/23) of his 1st serve and 55% (11/20) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Hsiou Hsu 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Svajda has surrendered 1 set in this tournament to conquer 57% of the points he played.
Svajda has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 57% of his matches (188-140). 13-12 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Svajda has a composed134-84 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Newport Challenger where he defeated Adrian Mannarino in the final 7-5 6-3.
Zachary has an aggregate 28-18 win-loss record in 2025, 13-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lexington Challenger
Bernard Tomic
26 - 22win/loss
182
17
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 42-33 | 29-23 | 6-7 | 2-1 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 50-29 | 34-19 | 12-5 | 4-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-27 | 35-19 | 4-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-12 | 24-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-12 | 4-4 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 211, Tomic reached the final after defeating Samir Banerjee 6-4 6-4, Nicolas Mejia 7-6(4) 6-3, Giles Hussey 7-6(5) 6-3 and Eliot Spizzirri 6-3 2-6 7-6(3).
In the semifinal, Bernard defeated Spizzirri (6-3 2-6 7-63). During the match Tomic scored 110 points vs Spizzirri’s 106. Tomic was pretty aggressive to blast 46 winners.
About the serving games, Tomic struck 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Bernard Tomic lost the serve 4 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Tomic put 65% of his first serves in, winning 65% (46/71) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (19/38) on the 2nd serve. Tomic broke Spizzirri 3 times after converting 18% of his break points (3/17).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Bernard has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Tomic’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Nottingham and the Lexington Challenger.
Bernard has an overall 26-21 win-loss record in 2025, 15-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lexington Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Svajda | Tomic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 9 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 79 | 94 |
| Pts | 280-210 | 333-294 |
| Total Points | 490 | 627 |
| Winners | 107 | 129 |
| %Winners | 38% | 39% |
Both Svajda and Tomic played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Zachary Svajda dropped 1 set, while Bernard Tomic dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Svajda and Tomic have played the same amount of sets 9. However, Svajda played 15 games less than Tomic. Zachary scored 107 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian struck 129 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Svajda | Tomic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 30 | 25 |
| Avg per match | 7.5 | 6.3 |
| 1st in | 134/238 | 184/306 |
| %1st in | 56% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 107/134 | 129/184 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 59/104 | 74/122 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 61% |
Svajda struck 30 aces (7.5 per match). Tomic recorded 25 aces (6.3 per match). Svajda won 80% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Tomic won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Svajda | Tomic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 15 | 10 |
| Converted | 15/28 | 10/40 |
| % Converted | 54% | 25% |
| Conceded | 21 | 17 |
| Saved | 16 | 11 |
| % Saved | 76% | 65% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 6 |
Zachary broke his opponents 15 times with a 54% conversion rate. Svajda conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded. The Australian broke his opponents 10 times with a 25% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 65% of the break points that he conceded.
| Svajda | ||||||
| R1 Rybakov | R2 Matsuda | 1/4 Basavareddy | 1/2 Hsiou | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-610 | 6-1 6-0 | 1-6 7-5 6-4 | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 13 | 29 | 16 | 79 | |
| pts | 81-63 | 58-30 | 86-83 | 55-34 | 280-210 | |
| Total points | 144 | 88 | 169 | 89 | 490 | |
| Winners | 33 | 22 | 33 | 19 | 107 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 38% | 38% | 35% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 13 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 30 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 39/64 | 24/42 | 48/89 | 23/43 | 134/238 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 57% | 54% | 53% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 33/39 | 22/24 | 33/48 | 19/23 | 107/134 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 92% | 69% | 83% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/25 | 8/18 | 22/41 | 11/20 | 59/104 | |
| % 2nd pts | 72% | 44% | 54% | 55% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 2 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 15 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 5/7 | 3/5 | 5/8 | 15/28 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 71% | 60% | 63% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 1 | 14 | 3 | 21 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 1/1 | 10/14 | 2/3 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 71% | 67% | 85% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| Tomic | ||||||
| R1 Banerjee | R2 Mejia | 1/4 Hussey | 1/2 Spizzirri | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 7-64 6-3 | 7-65 6-3 | 6-3 2-6 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 22 | 22 | 30 | 94 | |
| pts | 65-52 | 81-70 | 77-66 | 110-106 | 333-294 | |
| Total points | 117 | 151 | 143 | 216 | 627 | |
| Winners | 20 | 34 | 29 | 46 | 129 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 42% | 38% | 42% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 3 | 10 | 4 | 8 | 25 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 26/52 | 45/74 | 42/71 | 71/109 | 184/306 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 61% | 59% | 65% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 20/26 | 34/45 | 29/42 | 46/71 | 129/184 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 76% | 69% | 65% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/26 | 17/29 | 20/29 | 19/38 | 74/122 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 59% | 69% | 50% | 61% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 | |
| Converted | 3/12 | 2/7 | 2/4 | 3/17 | 10/40 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 29% | 50% | 18% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 17 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 2/3 | 2/2 | 7/11 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 67% | 100% | 64% | 58% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 | |