Zachary Svajda and Bernard Tomic will clash against each other in the final of the Lexington Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 1:00 pm on STADIUM 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Zachary Svajda who should win in 2 sets.

As per the initial odds, Zachary Svajda is the pick to win this match.
Zachary Svajda -> 1.23
Bernard Tomic -> 3.82

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Zachary Svajda vs. Bernard Tomic

This will be the 2nd time that Zachary Svajda and Bernard Tomic fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Svajda (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.

The last time that they played each other, Svajda won 7-5 6-1 in the qualifications in Washington back in July 2025.

Zachary Svajda

Zachary Svajda

29 - 18win/loss

Hard
14-12
I Hard
0-1
Clay
1-2
Grass
14-3
Rank
141
High
102
LLWWWWLWWW
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2025 33-21 18-15 1-2 0-1 14-3 0-0
2024 37-35 27-21 2-4 2-5 6-5 0-0
2023 46-24 28-8 2-6 10-6 6-4 0-0
2022 26-23 25-14 0-3 1-6 0-0 0-0
2021 24-13 24-12 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 148, Zachary got to the final after beating Alex Rybakov 6-2 7-6(10), Ryuki Matsuda 6-1 6-0

, Nishesh Basavareddy 1-6 7-5 6-4 and Yu Hsiou Hsu 6-1 6-3.

In the semifinal, Svajda had a good straight sets win against Hsiou Hsu (6-1 6-3). During the match, Svajda scored 55 points vs Hsiou Hsu’s 34. Svajda was extremely aggressive to blast 19 winners.

Talking about the service games, Svajda managed to score 5 aces and he was pretty steady in conceding no double faults. Overall, Zachary Svajda was very effective on serve to win 83% (19/23) of his 1st serve and 55% (11/20) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Hsiou Hsu 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).

Overall Performance in this tournament

Svajda has surrendered 1 set in this tournament to conquer 57% of the points he played.

Svajda has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 57% of his matches (188-140). 13-12 on hard in 2025. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Svajda has a composed134-84 match record in the last 8 years on hard.

His best result of the current year was winning the title the Newport Challenger where he defeated Adrian Mannarino in the final 7-5 6-3.

Zachary has an aggregate 28-18 win-loss record in 2025, 13-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Lexington Challenger

Lexington Challenger
Svajda's Record

Bernard Tomic

Bernard Tomic

26 - 22win/loss

Hard
15-13
I Hard
0-0
Clay
6-7
Grass
5-2
Rank
182
High
17
LLWWLWWLWW
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2025 42-33 29-23 6-7 2-1 5-2 0-0
2024 50-29 34-19 12-5 4-4 0-1 0-0
2023 41-27 35-19 4-4 2-4 0-0 0-0
2022 26-12 24-7 2-4 0-0 0-1 0-0
2021 9-12 4-4 2-4 2-3 1-1 0-0

Ranked no. 211, Tomic reached the final after defeating Samir Banerjee 6-4 6-4, Nicolas Mejia 7-6(4) 6-3, Giles Hussey 7-6(5) 6-3 and Eliot Spizzirri 6-3 2-6 7-6(3).

In the semifinal, Bernard defeated Spizzirri (6-3 2-6 7-63). During the match Tomic scored 110 points vs Spizzirri’s 106. Tomic was pretty aggressive to blast 46 winners.

About the serving games, Tomic struck 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Bernard Tomic lost the serve 4 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Tomic put 65% of his first serves in, winning 65% (46/71) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (19/38) on the 2nd serve. Tomic broke Spizzirri 3 times after converting 18% of his break points (3/17).

Overall Performance in this tournament

Bernard has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.

Tomic’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Nottingham and the Lexington Challenger.

Bernard has an overall 26-21 win-loss record in 2025, 15-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Lexington Challenger

Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2023. See his history.

Lexington Challenger
Tomic's Record

H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)

Z.Svajda
B.Tomic
5h:38
5h:38
Time on court​
7h:43
7h:43
1h:02
1h:02
Last match​
!
2h:24
2h:24
4
4
Match played
4
4
79
79
Games Played​
94
94
9
9
Set played​​
9
9
280
280
Total points​
333
333
70
70
Avg point​
83.3
83.3
107
107
Winners
129
129
26.8
26.8
Avg Winners​
32.3
32.3
38%
38%
Ratio winners
39%
39%
-- Serve --
30
30
Aces
25
25
7.5
7.5
Avg Aces
6.3
6.3
7
7
Double Faults
6
6
1.8
1.8
Avg Double Faults
1.5
1.5
107/134
107/134
1st won total​
129/184
129/184
!
80%
80%
1st won %
70%
70%
59/104
59/104
2nd won total​
74/122
74/122
57%
57%
2nd won %
!
61%
61%
-- Break Points --
15/28
15/28
BP won
10/40
10/40
3.8/7
3.8/7
Avg BP won
2.5/10
2.5/10
!
54%
54%
Won
!
25%
25%
21
21
Conceded
17
17
5.3
5.3
Avg Conceded
4.3
4.3
5
5
Broken
6
6
1.3
1.3
Avg Broken
1.5
1.5
16
16
Saved
11
11

Matches, sets, games and points

Points Svajda Tomic
Match played 4 4
Tot Set 9 9
Tot Games 79 94
Pts 280-210 333-294
Total Points 490 627
Winners 107 129
%Winners 38% 39%

Both Svajda and Tomic played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Zachary Svajda dropped 1 set, while Bernard Tomic dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Svajda and Tomic have played the same amount of sets 9. However, Svajda played 15 games less than Tomic. Zachary scored 107 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian struck 129 winners (39%).

Serve Performance

Serve Svajda Tomic
Aces 30 25
Avg per match 7.5 6.3
1st in 134/238 184/306
%1st in 56% 60%
1st pts 107/134 129/184
%1st pts 80% 70%
2nd pts 59/104 74/122
%2nd pts 57% 61%

Svajda struck 30 aces (7.5 per match). Tomic recorded 25 aces (6.3 per match). Svajda won 80% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Tomic won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks Svajda Tomic
Won 15 10
Converted 15/28 10/40
% Converted 54% 25%
Conceded 21 17
Saved 16 11
% Saved 76% 65%
Times Broken 5 6

Zachary broke his opponents 15 times with a 54% conversion rate. Svajda conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded. The Australian broke his opponents 10 times with a 25% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 65% of the break points that he conceded.

Svajda
R1
Rybakov
R2
Matsuda
1/4
Basavareddy
1/2
Hsiou
Total
Score 6-2 7-610 6-1 6-0 1-6 7-5 6-4 6-1 6-3
Tot Set 2 2 3 2 9
Tot Games 21 13 29 16 79
pts 81-63 58-30 86-83 55-34 280-210
Total points 144 88 169 89 490
Winners 33 22 33 19 107
%Winners 41% 38% 38% 35% 38%
SERVE
Aces 13 5 7 5 30
Double Faults 0 4 3 0 7
1st in 39/64 24/42 48/89 23/43 134/238
% 1st in 61% 57% 54% 53% 56%
1st pts 33/39 22/24 33/48 19/23 107/134
% 1st pts 85% 92% 69% 83% 80%
2nd pts 18/25 8/18 22/41 11/20 59/104
% 2nd pts 72% 44% 54% 55% 57%
Breaks
Won 2 5 3 5 15
Converted 2/8 5/7 3/5 5/8 15/28
Converted % 25% 71% 60% 63% 54%
Conceded 3 1 14 3 21
Saved 3/3 1/1 10/14 2/3 16
Saved % 100% 100% 71% 67% 85%
Times Broken 0 0 4 1 5
Tomic
R1
Banerjee
R2
Mejia
1/4
Hussey
1/2
Spizzirri
Total
Score 6-4 6-4 7-64 6-3 7-65 6-3 6-3 2-6 7-63
Tot Set 2 2 2 3 9
Tot Games 20 22 22 30 94
pts 65-52 81-70 77-66 110-106 333-294
Total points 117 151 143 216 627
Winners 20 34 29 46 129
%Winners 31% 42% 38% 42% 39%
SERVE
Aces 3 10 4 8 25
Double Faults 3 0 0 3 6
1st in 26/52 45/74 42/71 71/109 184/306
% 1st in 50% 61% 59% 65% 60%
1st pts 20/26 34/45 29/42 46/71 129/184
% 1st pts 77% 76% 69% 65% 70%
2nd pts 18/26 17/29 20/29 19/38 74/122
% 2nd pts 69% 59% 69% 50% 61%
Breaks
Won 3 2 2 3 10
Converted 3/12 2/7 2/4 3/17 10/40
Converted % 25% 29% 50% 18% 25%
Conceded 1 3 2 11 17
Saved 0/1 2/3 2/2 7/11 11
Saved % 0% 67% 100% 64% 58%
Times Broken 1 1 0 4 6

Upcoming matches in the draw