Yannick Hanfmann and Jan Choinski will play each other in the quarter of the Hagen Challenger for the 7th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 12:00 pm on WOLF STADIUM COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Yannick Hanfmann who should win in 3 sets.
Yannick Hanfmann -> 1.54
Jan Choinski -> 2.35
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Yannick Hanfmann vs. Jan Choinski
This will be the 7th time that Yannick Hanfmann and Jan Choinski fight against each other. The head to head is 4-2 for Hanfmann (see full H2H stats), 3-1 on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Choinski won 6-4 6-2 in the 1st round in the Heilbronn Challenger back in 2024.
Yannick Hanfmann
24 - 19win/loss
103
45
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 46-28 | 12-9 | 17-12 | 12-4 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 24-33 | 8-11 | 12-15 | 2-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-30 | 6-8 | 29-14 | 4-5 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-26 | 4-3 | 21-16 | 7-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-24 | 1-4 | 14-11 | 1-4 | 2-4 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 150, Yannick reached the quarter after defeating Jay Dylan Hara Friend 7-5 6-2 and Timofey Skatov 3-6 6-4 7-6(6).
In the 2nd round against Skatov, Hanfmann recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 7-66). During the match, Hanfmann scored 104 points vs Skatov’s 95. Hanfmann was extremely aggressive to blast 50 winners.
Regarding the service games, Hanfmann scored 13 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Yannick Hanfmann lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Hanfmann put 67% of his first serves in, winning 83% (50/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (13/29) on the 2nd serve. The German broke Skatov twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Yannick has surrendered 1 set in this tournament to conquer 55% of the points he played.
Hanfmann has winning record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (323-235). 14-12 on clay in 2025. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Hanfmann has an overall 202-116 match record in the last years on clay.
The German has an aggregate 24-19 win-loss record in 2025, 14-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Hagen Challenger
The German has never competed in this tournament before.
Jan Choinski
23 - 17win/loss
125
125
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 40-27 | 0-4 | 31-15 | 6-6 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-33 | 4-4 | 24-16 | 5-9 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-35 | 1-4 | 30-19 | 5-5 | 2-5 | 3-2 |
| 2022 | 46-21 | 5-5 | 35-14 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 151, Jan got to the quarter after defeating Lorenzo Giustino 4-6 6-3 7-6(1) and Dmitry Popko 3-6 6-1 6-4.
In the 2nd round against Popko, The Brit recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-1 6-4). During the match Choinski scored 83 points vs Popko’s 67. Choinski was pretty aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Choinski fired 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Jan Choinski was exceptionally effective on serve to win 71% (34/48) of his 1st serve and 74% (20/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Brit broke Popko 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Brit has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Troyes Challenger where he overcame Calvin Hemery in the final 6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 and the Bunschoten Challenger where he overcame Kimmer Coppejans in the final 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Choinski has a compiled 23-17 win-loss record in 2025, 17-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Hanfmann | Choinski |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 52 | 58 |
| Pts | 174-143 | 193-178 |
| Total Points | 317 | 371 |
| Winners | 83 | 76 |
| %Winners | 48% | 39% |
Both Hanfmann and Choinski played 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Yannick Hanfmann surrendered 1 set, while Jan Choinski conceded 2 sets. Hanfmann has played 1 set(s) less than Choinski (5 vs 6). Therefore, Hanfmann played 6 games less than Choinski. Yannick scored 83 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit struck 76 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Hanfmann | Choinski |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 21 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 10.5 | 6 |
| 1st in | 96/136 | 114/194 |
| %1st in | 71% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 83/96 | 76/114 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 20/40 | 47/80 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 59% |
Hanfmann made 21 aces (10.5 per match). Choinski blasted 12 aces (6 per match). Hanfmann won 86% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Choinski won 67% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Hanfmann | Choinski |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 7 |
| Converted | 5/13 | 7/18 |
| % Converted | 38% | 39% |
| Conceded | 6 | 18 |
| Saved | 3 | 13 |
| % Saved | 50% | 72% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 5 |
The German broke his opponents 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. Hanfmann lost his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponents 7 times with a 39% conversion rate. Choinski conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 72% of the break points that he conceded.
| Hanfmann | ||||
| R1 Dylan Hara Friend | R2 Skatov | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-2 | 3-6 6-4 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 32 | 52 | |
| pts | 70-48 | 104-95 | 174-143 | |
| Total points | 118 | 199 | 317 | |
| Winners | 33 | 50 | 83 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 13 | 21 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 36/47 | 60/89 | 96/136 | |
| % 1st in | 77% | 67% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 33/36 | 50/60 | 83/96 | |
| % 1st pts | 92% | 83% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 13/29 | 20/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 45% | 50% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 2/6 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 33% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | – | 50% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
| Choinski | ||||
| R1 Giustino | R2 Popko | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 7-61 | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 26 | 58 | |
| pts | 110-111 | 83-67 | 193-178 | |
| Total points | 221 | 150 | 371 | |
| Winners | 42 | 34 | 76 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 41% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 66/119 | 48/75 | 114/194 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 64% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 42/66 | 34/48 | 76/114 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 71% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 27/53 | 20/27 | 47/80 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 74% | 59% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 3/6 | 7/18 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 50% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 16 | 2 | 18 | |
| Saved | 12/16 | 1/2 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 50% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
Tennis Scores in Hagen Challenger
- Daniel Masur/Benito Sanchez MartinezMasur/Benito Sanchez Martinez – Dmitry Popko/Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaPopko/Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Hendrik Jebens/Albano OlivettiJebens/Albano Olivetti – Ivan Sabanov/Matej SabanovSabanov/Matej Sabanov (7-63 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (2-4) – H2H and prediction