Botic Van De Zandschulp and Guy Den Ouden will play each other in the quarter of the Hagen Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 11:00 am on PLATZMANN CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 3 sets.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.49
Guy Den Ouden -> 2.48
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Guy Den Ouden
There is no head to head record between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Guy Den Ouden since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
19 - 20win/loss
77
22
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-32 | 13-11 | 11-10 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 87, Van De Zandschulp got to the quarter after defeating Luka Mikrut 6-4 6-2 and Daniel Masur 6-4 6-1.
In the 2nd round, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Masur (6-4 6-1). During the match, Van De Zandschulp scored 73 points vs Masur’s 48. The Dutch was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, Van De Zandschulp fired 13 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Botic Van De Zandschulp was extremely efficient on serve to win 76% (29/38) of his 1st serve and 57% (12/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Botic broke Masur 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Van De Zandschulp hasn’t lost yet a set in this event to win 60% of the points he played.
Van De Zandschulp has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (342-216). 11-9 on clay in 2025. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Van De Zandschulp has an overall 148-92 match record in the last years on clay.
The Dutch’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in Kitzbuhel.
Van De Zandschulp has a compiled 19-20 win-loss record in 2025, 11-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Hagen Challenger
The Dutch has never competed in this tournament before.
Guy Den Ouden
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 47-18 | 0-1 | 46-15 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 35-24 | 3-7 | 28-12 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 59-19 | 35-9 | 24-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 14-12 | 12-7 | 2-2 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-13 | 16-5 | 13-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 173 (career-high), Den Ouden reached the quarter after beating Gonzalo Villanueva 6-2 6-3 and Christoph Negritu 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Den Ouden defeated Negritu (7-65 6-74 6-3). During the match Den Ouden scored 115 points vs Negritu’s 110. The Dutch was pretty aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Talking about serving, Den Ouden bagged 3 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Guy Den Ouden was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 78% (46/59) of his 1st serve and 53% (27/51) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Guy broke Negritu 3 times after converting 27% of his break points (3/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Guy has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
The Dutch’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Antalya,the Kigali 2 Challenger,M25 Santa Margherita di Pula,the Prague Challenger and the Heilbronn Challenger.
Guy has an aggregate 38-14 win-loss record in 2025, 37-12 on clay (See FULL STATS)
.H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Den Ouden |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 35 | 52 |
| Pts | 140-95 | 180-156 |
| Total Points | 235 | 336 |
| Winners | 60 | 68 |
| %Winners | 43% | 38% |
Both Van De Zandschulp and Den Ouden played 2 matches. At the moment, Guy Den Ouden dropped 1 set while Botic Van De Zandschulp hasn’t conceded a set so far. Van De Zandschulp has played 1 set(s) less than Den Ouden (4 vs 5). Therefore, Van De Zandschulp played 17 games less than Den Ouden. Botic scored 60 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The Dutch managed to score 68 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Den Ouden |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 20 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 4.5 |
| 1st in | 71/103 | 93/171 |
| %1st in | 69% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 60/71 | 68/93 |
| %1st pts | 85% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 17/32 | 43/78 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 55% |
Van De Zandschulp recorded 20 aces (10 per match). Den Ouden made 9 aces (4.5 per match). Van De Zandschulp won 85% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Den Ouden won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Den Ouden |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 8 |
| Converted | 7/17 | 8/18 |
| % Converted | 41% | 44% |
| Conceded | 4 | 8 |
| Saved | 3 | 4 |
| % Saved | 75% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Botic broke his opponents 7 times with a 41% conversion rate. Botic conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Den Ouden broke his opponents 8 times with a 44% conversion rate. Guy conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van De Zandschulp | ||||
| R1 Mikrut | R2 Masur | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 17 | 35 | |
| pts | 67-47 | 73-48 | 140-95 | |
| Total points | 114 | 121 | 235 | |
| Winners | 31 | 29 | 60 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 40% | 43% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 7 | 13 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 33/44 | 38/59 | 71/103 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 64% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 31/33 | 29/38 | 60/71 | |
| % 1st pts | 94% | 76% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/11 | 12/21 | 17/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 57% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 4/10 | 7/17 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 40% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | – | 75% | 38% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Den Ouden | ||||
| R1 Villanueva | R2 Negritu | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | 7-65 6-74 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 35 | 52 | |
| pts | 65-46 | 115-110 | 180-156 | |
| Total points | 111 | 225 | 336 | |
| Winners | 22 | 46 | 68 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 40% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 3 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 34/61 | 59/110 | 93/171 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 22/34 | 46/59 | 68/93 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 78% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/27 | 27/51 | 43/78 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 53% | 55% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 3/11 | 8/18 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 27% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tennis Scores in Hagen Challenger
- Daniel Masur/Benito Sanchez MartinezMasur/Benito Sanchez Martinez – Dmitry Popko/Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaPopko/Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Hendrik Jebens/Albano OlivettiJebens/Albano Olivetti – Ivan Sabanov/Matej SabanovSabanov/Matej Sabanov (7-63 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (2-4) – H2H and prediction